Saturday, May 26, 2012


Commentary

Twenty Years After 'Black January,' Azerbaijan Still Struggles For Freedom

The bodies of protesters slain by Soviet troops, January 20, 1990
TEXT SIZE - +
By Kenan Aliyev
Twenty years ago today, on January 20, 1990, Soviet troops stormed Baku by order of the Kremlin in an ultimately failed attempt to save Communist rule and put down Azerbaijan's independence movement.

For several days, those 26,000 troops cracked down on protesters, firing into crowds without warning and killing more than 200 people. At least 700 were injured. Moscow declared emergency rule, which lasted for more than a year. Thousands of Popular Front members and sympathizers were arrested, imprisoned, and tortured.

I remember that cold, windy January night well. I was keeping vigil with some friends on one of the main roads leading from the airport into the city. I couldn't get in touch with my parents, who had gone into the city in hopes of finding me. Later I saw my father's tears for the first time in my life; he and my mother had gone to the morgues in search of me, finding instead the bodies of dozens of dead lining bloodstained corridors. They saw the bodies of women and children, of Azeris, of Tatars, of Armenians, of Jews, of Lezgins, of Russians. All of them ordinary citizens of Baku.

I remember walking the streets as the sun rose that morning, seeing tanks and armored personnel carriers topped with young soldiers with guns at the ready. The country was in a state of disbelief: no one thought that, after the bloody events in Tbilisi on April 9, 1989, Moscow would dare to use the army against civilians again. We were still gripped by the "Tbilisi syndrome" -- the naive belief that such a tragedy could not happen again.

Later, I remember the mass burial of hundreds of victims at Baku's Shehidler Khiyabani (Martyrs' Alley). Millions attended the funeral. The harbor was clogged with small private boats blaring their horns. Azerbaijan was united like never before. The era of the Soviet Union was over.

The traditional 40-day mourning period was marked by a national strike in honor of those who had stood up and sacrificed their lives for freedom. Factories ground to a standstill and people stayed home from work.

Soviet Defense Minister Dmitry Yazov explained the attack saying, "We came to destroy the political structure of the Popular Front to prevent their victory in the upcoming elections scheduled for March 19, 1990," he said.

Other Soviet officials were less blunt and tried to spin the tragedy. Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev defended the invasion by citing the supposedly imminent danger of Islamic fundamentalism in Azerbaijan.

Other officials used tensions between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region as a pretext for the occupation. Indeed, violence against ethnic Armenians in Baku had erupted one week earlier on January 13, killing around 50 people. Thirteen thousand Interior Ministry troops that were stationed in Baku did not nothing to stop the violence.

Still Hoping For Freedom

The invasion did not turn out as the Soviet leadership intended. The Red Army killed the last shreds of hope among Azerbaijanis that the Soviet Union could somehow be reformed and preserved. Twenty months later, Azerbaijan declared its independence. Hundreds of thousands of people made the symbolic gesture of burning their Communist Party cards.

Looking back on those events 20 years later, the feeling of pride remains. Azerbaijan is an independent country. It has its own military and currency. It is an important player in regional energy and security issues. It is a major Caspian-region transit hub.

But while independence has been established, freedom has been more elusive. The crowds that faced down the Soviet tanks, after all, were crying out mostly for freedom.

"Not free" is Freedom House's terse assessment of Azerbaijan today. The NGO cites the country's lack of democratic institutions, free media, and an independent judiciary. The Council of Europe decries the detentions of political prisoners and journalists. Transparency International, an NGO that monitors corruption, says the government is "highly corrupt."

Free states are stronger than authoritarian ones because they are accountable to the people and rule with popular consent. Baku's current rulers should remember that even Soviet tanks could not keep the Communist bosses in power for long after popular will turned decidedly against them.

In the first week after the 1990 invasion, local state television was shut down. Soviet agents had blown up the Baku broadcast transmitters hours before the tanks rolled in. Only the Azeri-language programs of Radio Liberty, broadcasting from Munich, broke through the media blackout. The short-wave broadcasts of Radio Azadliq were a lifeline to the outside world, and a symbol of hope and the dream of freedom for the protesters.

It is sadly ironic that now -- 20 years later -- the Azerbaijan government has banned international broadcasting in the country and Radio Azadliq, its mission far from accomplished, is again broadcasting only on short-wave frequencies and satellite.

Could Azerbaijan witness another "Black January"? Russia's military intervention in Georgia in August 2008 gives new meaning to the term "Tbilisi syndrome" and suggests that anything is possible.

Moscow's growing ambitions in what it still calls "the near abroad" should not be underestimated. The conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh remains unresolved and continues to afford the Kremlin an excuse for meddling in the region. If a crisis comes, can the government in Baku count on the support of its citizens?

January 20, 1990, was a crucial trial by fire for Azerbaijan as a nation. Today's anniversary reminds us that the struggle for what the protesters then demanded remains unfinished.

Kenan Aliyev is the director of RFE/RL's Azerbaijani Service. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL.
This article was originally published in 2009.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 4
    Next 
by: Sergey from: Chicago, Illinois, USA
January 20, 2010 10:56
"Twenty years ago today, on January 20, 1990, Soviet troops stormed Baku by order of the Kremlin in an ultimately failed attempt to save Communist rule and put down Azerbaijan's independence movement."

Kenan Aliyev conveniently "forgets" to mention about anti-Armenian pogroms and massacres that occured in Baku and throughout Azerbajan since January 13 prior to January 20th, 1990.

http://www.asbarez.com/2010/01/19/remembering-black-january-and-the-massacre-of-bakus-armenians/

Here is a news release about the documentary "Nothing, But Genocide" about massacres of Armenians in Baku for a full week before Soviet Troops were called in.

http://news.am/en/news/12472.html

"The author, journalist Marina Grigoryan said that the aim of the documentary is not sowing hatred, but telling the truth about the Armenian pogroms in Baku in January 1990. “This is the first documentary of the series entitled ‘Nothing but genocide’,” Grigoryan said. The 40-minute documentary was created by the Public Relations and Information Center, RA Presidential Administration."

"The authors state that after 5:00 p.m. on January 13, 1990, about 50,000 brutalized Azeris, with Armenian residents’ addresses at their disposal, were ready to go to murder, plunder and rape. The documentary contains numerous quotes of the Soviet and western press, which prove that horrific murders were committed in Baku January 13 to 19, with Armenians’ dead bodies shown."

"The documentary informs the viewer that over the last 20 years Azerbaijan has been pursuing a policy of lie about the events in Baku in January 1990. The State Television of Azerbaijan shows the world the so-called “Shahids’ lane”, the burial place of the thugs killed by the Soviet troops introduced into the city to prevent further brutal murders of Armenians."

RFE/RL states that Kenan Aliyev opinion is "the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL". Sounds a bit strange considering that Kenan Aliyev is the director of Azerbajani RFE/RL services. Anyway, I would like to request that RFE/RL will post a comment that contradicts Kenan Aliyev's distorted picture about tragic events in Baku of January 1990 and give a full account of the chain of events before January 20, 1990 entrance of Soviet troops in Baku.

I would like to hear RFE/RL giving a full account of anti-Armenian pogroms and massacres in which about 300 Azerbajani Armenians died and hundreds of thousands fled Azerbajan. I also would like to know if Popular Front of Azerbajan played any role in these anti-Armenian massacres.

by: Zoltan from: Hungary
January 20, 2010 19:17
Unfortunatelly Azerbaijan is not the only country among the ex-Soviet states which is failed to achieve freedom and democracy.

We can remember Andijon, Uzbekistan in 2005. that shows violent oppression against dissent is still alive.

One can consider only Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan as more or less democratic countries.

Russia was once on the right path towards democracy but it have retreated.

While the rest of ex member states are still struggle for freedom. In those countries nothing have changed only the oppressive system does not call itself communist but it is only and simply authoritarian.

We can hope that those democracy initiatives especially in Ukraine will have a healthy effect on Russian politics. As if Russia turns to be a democracy it will boost democratic movements throughout the region.

by: vugar gojayev from: baku
January 20, 2010 19:38

Very well written piece depicting the grim picture of the ground!
With 18 years passed since the collapse the USSR, today Azerbaijan is less different than a Central Asia-style dictatorship, with effectively destroying political opposition, silencing independent media and instilling fear into the society. So, less has changed for better, as Azerbaijan still remains desperate and torn between the modernisation and acute autocracy.

by: hao
January 20, 2010 21:08
Yes, the armenians and the azebayanis hate each other some centuries ago, they kill each other fecuently, and, without any precedent in the whole world, recently it was imposible even play a soccer match between their national teams. But, of course, for the author, the bad guys are...¿can't you guess it?... Yes, you are right: the russians.
I don't know if the author wanted to obtain the simpathy of americans using rusophobia, but im sure that this article doesn't explain the real problem: the extreme nationalist from both, armenians and azerbaijanis, that makes imposible to build a pacefull neigbouhood between these two nations.
It is the nationalism, not the comunism the problem in this case: before comunism rules, there were killins and war in the area. And when comunism dissapeared, there were more killings and war in the area. These are just facts.

by: Taxpayer from: USA
January 21, 2010 04:51
As Mr. Aliyev noted in his article "Indeed, violence against ethnic Armenians in Baku had erupted one week earlier on January 13, killing around 50 people." I would like to ask everybody - wouldn't this fact alone be a good enough reason to deploy National Guard in the United States? I'm not sure where this number came from, it must be much higher judging from the Western media reports of the time. But the number of victims (burned alive, stoned, maimed, raped, etc.) is secondary to the fact that it was an organized effort to exterminate an ethnic minority. How many innocent lives were saved from pogroms by these Soviet troops that brought back law and order and allowed a more peaceful exodus of the remaining Armenians?

by: Rule from: Cologne
January 21, 2010 11:14
The Armenian newspaper of Asbarez that "Sergey from Chicago" proudly quotes, contains a plain forgery. Check the photo on Asbarez
http://www.asbarez.com/2010/01/19/remembering-black-january-and-the-massacre-of-bakus-armenians/

Armenians put the photo of the victims of the 20 January tragedy and present it to the audience as the "Armenian victims of pogroms"... This is outrageous. On the picture we see the dead body of Vera Bessantina.

Compare it to this:
http://www.news.az/photos/photo/9243-0b72db28b93cbd216dbadea5d0a89fa9.jpg

It is the same photo, the same poor girl, Vera Bessantina, who was killed on 20 January by Soviet troops.

And this is not the first time Armenians do the forgeries. A while ago they published the photo of a killed little girl from Khojali and presented it as a victim of the "1915 genocide". SHAME ON YOU!

by: Vugar from: Baku
January 21, 2010 11:19
Zoltan, since when is Armenia "more or less democratic"? Do you know what happened on 1 March, 2008? They stole presidential elections and then massacred their own electorate.
Armenia was even very close to be expelled from the Council of Europe for the lack of democracy!
Besides, the nation that expelled the entire minority of 210,000 people (Azeri minority) cannot be democratic by definition!

by: Salman from: Baku
January 21, 2010 11:26
Sergey from Chicago conveniently forgets that Armenian pogroms were done by KGB agents to get a good pretext for the introduction of Soviet troops to Baku. He also conveniently forgets that 30.000 Soviet troops were already stationed in Baku during the pogroms and they did NOTHING to stop violence - that's because they NEEDED pogroms. Everything was done in front of their eyes, and they did nothing.
Gorbachev sent the troops not to save armenians, but to save USSR.
Though, Armenians today are free to think whatever they want to think. It's their choice and freedom of thinking.
Besides, it would be useful for the outsiders like sergey to check the photos of those "thugs" in the Shehids Alley and see who they are. There are many young girls, elderly woman, a blind man, many ethnic Russians, Jews, Tatars, etc. All those people whom this sergey calls "thugs". Shame on him!

by: tadbir from: Baku
January 21, 2010 11:31
To the "taxpayer" from USA:

The Soviet troops were sent not to stop pogroms, but to crush the independence movement. Pogroms were organized by the Kremlin to have the reason for sending troops. Perhaps, this "taxpayer" lives in the idealistic world and doesn't even know wjat KGB could do to save communism.

besides, if you are talking about pure math, think about this: even if we assume that you are right (a big "if"), how many lives were killed to stop pogroms which had already ended by 16 January? You will fail to answer this question, unless you are armenian who can always come up with some irrational explanation.

by: J from: US
January 21, 2010 13:55
I don't think the Popular Front had any interest in freedom and democracy. If it did I don't see what it had accomplished. Free elections?
Comments page of 4
    Next 

Latest Commentary

No records found for this widget:963

More Commentary

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (24 total)

Rafi: There's no need to bring in a straw man, and make me say ... More

Brzezinski Calls Putin Rule 'Anachronism'

Latest Comment (4 total)

Batanage:
Look who is Talking now, Brezenski the hypocrite.

The guy who spread fundemetelists around ... More

Ashton's Wardrobe Diplomacy With Iran Gets Noticed

Latest Comment (5 total)

Rob: Let's hope Ashton's wardrobe diplomacy will prevent a war with Iran. She should ... More