Saturday, May 26, 2012


News

UN Envoy Warns Of Growing Tensions In Bosnia

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon (right) meets with Valentin Inzko, high representative to Bosnia, at UN headquarters in New York on May 24
TEXT SIZE - +
By Nikola Krastev
UNITED NATIONS -- Austrian diplomat Valentin Inzko regularly travels to New York to deliver a report before the UN Security Council on how Bosnia-Herzegovina is faring in putting the principles of the 1995 Dayton peace agreement to work.

Inzko is the seventh official to hold the position of high representative to Bosnia, a position that itself was created in the wake of Dayton to oversee its implementation.

Speaking on May 24 before the Security Council, Inzko noted that while prospects for regional reconciliation in the western Balkans continue to improve, internal politics in Bosnia have deteriorated. He pointed to the leadership of Bosnia's Serbian entity, the Republika Srpska, as the source of the trouble.

"The leadership of Republika Srpska has, for example, led the way in undermining state-level institutions and by threatening to hold an entity referendum that would seek to repudiate the authority of the high representative and decisions under Dayton," Inzko said. 

Milorad Dodik, the prime minister of the Republika Srpska, has repeatedly threatened to hold referendums seeking to dissolve the Office of the High Representative and formally separate his Serbian-majority entity from the rest of Bosnia.

Lack Of Consensus

Inzko told the Security Council that any entity referendum challenging the authority of the Dayton accords would be unlawful and would endanger the entity itself.

Milorad Dodik, prime miniser of Republika Srpska
More generally, the high representative said that Bosnia remains afflicted by a lack of consensus on what kind of state it wants to be -- one with a tight central government or a decentralized federation.

"Reference to the possible emergence of a new state in an international [newspaper] and proposals that nationalist politicians should start discussing the peaceful dissolution of Bosnia-Herzegovina, or that the country should not exist at all," Inzko said, "have been met by counterstatements to the effect that the disaffected elements are welcome to leave but will not be allowed to take any part of the country with them."

Also present in New York was Haris Silajdzic, the Muslim member of Bosnia's rotating, tripartite presidency. The three-pronged system is another Dayton creation meant to accommodate Bosnia's multiethnic makeup, with a Serb, a Croat, and a Muslim sharing equal responsibility.

Silajdzic, who currently holds the chairmanship of the rotating presidency, attended the Security Council session and gave his own assessment of the situation in the country. But his comments were overshadowed by protests from two fellow officials -- Nebojsa Radmanovic, the Serbian member of the tripartite presidency; and Bosnia's prime minister, Nikola Spiric, also a Serb.

Neither Radmanovic nor Spiric were in New York for the meeting. But both sent letters to the Security Council and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stating preemptively that they did not approve of any comments Silajdzic might make at the meeting because they had not been formally approved by them ahead of time.

Ongoing Breakdown

The letters were a breathtaking demonstration of the ongoing breakdown in Bosnia's political structures. But Silajdzic remained upbeat. Speaking to reporters after the conclusion of the meeting, Silajdzic said he had heard "very valuable" contributions and comments from the council members.

The enduring goal, he said, was to support and implement the Dayton peace agreement. "Lately there are attempts to renegotiate this agreement at the expense of Bosnia-Herzegovina quietly. And I came here today," he said, "to say that this may have very serious consequences, that we should stop renegotiating the Dayton agreement at the expense of Bosnia and Herzegovina, because it is endangering peace and stability in Bosnia-Herzegovina."

Haris Silajdzic
Silajdzic accused his political opponents, and even Inzko himself, of challenging Bosnia's right to state property as well as the need to ensure the safe return of property to its prewar owners, a major sticking point between Bosnia's ethnic communities.

The Bosnian chairman argued that Article 1 of the Dayton peace agreement affirms the existence of Bosnia as a state with normal property rights.

"This is questioned by our opposition, my opposition in Bosnia-Herzegovina and lately by the high representative, and this is what I said today: This should not be questioned and no one has mandate to question it, including the high representative," Silajdzic said.

'Not Constructive'

Silajdzic reserved critical comments for the Russian representative at the meeting. Moscow, a longtime ally of Serbia proper as well as the Republika Srpska, is seen as the major roadblock in an international settlement to Bosnia's final political status.

Silajdzic characterized as "not constructive" the comments by Konstantin Dolgov, Russia's deputy ambassador to the UN. Dolgov described Moscow as satisfied with the overall situation, despite the simmering of what he described as nationalist sentiments in Bosnia. But he called Silajdzic's description of the situation as unnecessarily alarmist. "Regrettably, these assessments were one-sided and unconstructive," he said.

Dolgov extended his criticism to Inzko, saying the Austrian diplomat's report could not be seen as either objective or balanced. Inzko's reports, Dolgov claimed, have a tradition of being openly anti-Serbian.

Many Bosnia-watchers are looking ahead to the country's planned general elections in October, where Dodik, among others, will be competing for reelection.

Inzko on May 24 expressed concern that campaigning in the run-up to the vote could give way to highly divisive rhetoric disputing Bosnia's sovereignty and constitutional order -- something that in turn could lead to provocative actions or even violence. Inzko's next report before the UN is due in November, after the elections.

Silajdzic today had been due to travel on to Belgrade, for what was to have been the first visit to Serbia by the Bosnian Muslim politician since the war began in 1992. A statement from Silajdzic's cabinet indicated, however, that the chairman has postponed the visit due to engine problems with his airplane.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Johann from: USA
May 25, 2010 12:41
Republica Srpska should have the same right to declare independent state, as Kosvo !!!
There is a lot of similarity beatween this two national states, same thing also applies to Transnistra, and Abkhazia !!!
In Response

by: Rob from: US
May 25, 2010 17:38
Kosovo was settled with illegal albanian migrants during Tito era, who provided shelter to any albanian seeking refuge from communist Albania. Those albanian migrants rebelled against Serbs who provided them with shelter, with support from fundamentalist Arab regimes and incited to violence by western media. NATO interfered on the side of murderous albanian muslim mobs and forcefully separated Kosovo from Serbia. There is nothing legal in that process or in the actions of western powers. One has to note that USA got its payback from muslims on 9/11, and continues to get it in Iraq and Afghanistan. There is a twisted form of justice in this.
In Response

by: Erdal Maglajlic from: St.Louis
May 25, 2010 21:42
There is a big difference between kosovo and Republika Srpska kosovo's albanians didn't have too ethniclly cleance kosovo they were only fighting back. while Srpska's Serbs had to either kill or force out about 50% of its population to become a serb majority. So kosovo should be it's own country while Srpska should be abolished now.
In Response

by: Igor from: Chicago
May 26, 2010 17:14
I am not sure where are you getting your facts from, but we all know that Serbs as well were forced to leave many places such as Croatia, Muslim part of Bosnia, and definitely Kosovo. More ever, remaining Serbs at Kosovo are still having international armed troops escort, even if they go to buy groceries.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
May 26, 2010 08:08
You don't know what you're talking about. Repluka srpska was built on genocide. If the chetniks do not want to live with Bosniaks then let them go east of the Drina where they belong but they can't take not even one square millimeter of Bosnian land! And if they try it will be their downfall! Down with Velika Srbija!
In Response

by: medicine for jihaad from: Balkans
June 08, 2010 00:44
It's hard to talk to you and other Muslim radicals, your brains are wired on a different frequency. No wonder why the free world is afraid of people like you.
In Response

by: Andrew from: Tbilisi
May 26, 2010 18:28
Sorry Johann,

But in the case of Abkhazia, the largest ethnic group in the province was the victim of Russian sponsored ethnic cleansing, this being the Georgians at 47% of the pre war population.

The Apsu (what we know call "Abkhazians" though the name should apply to all living in the province regardless of ethnicity) were only 17%.

The separatists also "cleansed" the province of Pontic Greeks, Azeri's, and all those who supported the Georgian central government.

Therefore, Abkhazia does not have the right to declare an independent state without the return of the refugees, who would almost certainly vote down any independence referendum.

You are unfortunately advocating genocide and mass murder Johann.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

by: jovan cvjeticanin from: chicago
May 25, 2010 18:40
There will always be problems in Bosnia, as long as there is Muslims that want to have a Islamic state. The Serbs and Croats shouldn't have to deal with it. The Serbs in RS should be allowed to break off, like the Americans close friends, the Shiptars. If the Muslims don't like the way, Bosnia is, and not a Muslim mini state, they should leave Europe. Why don't France or Germany or even England make a mini Muslim state out of their respected lands?!?
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
May 27, 2010 11:03
No, why don't Serbs who don't like Bosna just go east of the Drina where they belong and leave us balije in PEACE?
As for your idiotic Karadzic blab of Bosniaks wanting an "islamic republic" I refuse to comment. Everybody knows this is nothing but a Karadzic propaganda lie to try and peddle the Swerb genocidal anti-Bosniak crusade as a "just and holy war" against "Islamist terrorism"
And get this: The Cross will NEVER chase the Crescent out of Bosnia!

by: Reis from: North Cyprus
May 26, 2010 21:59
Bosnia should be unified state under Sarayejo control. Murdering Serbian hordes massacred thousand of people in Bosnia. Respuplica sırpska is illegal and power of Bosniaks would overrun them, if serbs dont obey them
In Response

by: Guel
May 27, 2010 10:16
You are just full of crap... however you Bosniaks just keep thinking on the past and not the future... a forced unity would just bring another war. There has to be agreements into a unity and everyone has to like it. Stop blaming each other and get over it!!! Serbs do not keep talking about the past and think more on how to become true Europeans... and build a life... all you Bosniaks know how to do well is blame the rest of the world for a situation that you all created... Get over IT!! Look forward and live a good life... things will get better but only if you all Bosnians help!. The EU is trying and things WILL become better! It is a matter of time, but if I compared Spain 25 years ago and now... it is totally different... a very modern country with great infrastructure. 25 Years ago it was like Bosnia today... basically...
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
June 04, 2010 13:22
No, YOU are full of crap! Serbs always try to justify their horrible crimes with all the victimization they were allegedly supposed to under the Otooman Empire, the Austrohungarian Empire, the Germans, the Ustashe etc. etc. etc at endless nauseam. They always say "Okay, we committed war crimes, but so did you, you are as guilty as we are, we were here first, you are nothing but islamicized Serbs, traitors blah blah blah." So, you say, Bosniaks should forget about Srebrenica, about the massscres they were victims of in 1941-45, about being expelled and half their country being amputated? Who are you to tell Bosniaks to just forgive and forget? If somebody killed your father and mother , expelled you from your house, robbed you of all you had and cherished, raped your daughter and your sister before your eyes, would you forgive him? Who are you to tell Bosniaks that they must give up their homeland and be content to be teh Palestinians of Europe? Where do you get that crap from about Spain being like Bosnia is 25 years ago? Know that 25 years ago Spain had been at peace for 46 years, that it had prospered enormously and you can say about Franco what you want but at least he kept Spain out of WWII, which the Reds certainly would not or could not have avoided; and Spain has a middle class, which in Bosnia, between the chetniks of WWII and of today, between Tito's Communists and the war, was almost completely destroyed. That is why they find themselves in that fix, with separatism and irredentism, while Spain, despite all efforts by some idiot ultranationalist elements will not be rent apart. Why anybody should defend that scum Karadzic and the evil and perverse Greater Serb ideology is beyond my comprehension. Obvioulsy who does that must have an immense hate of Bosniaks or of Muslims in general. And I feel threatened by such individuals and would like to let them know that neither I nor the Bosniaks will be led like lambs to the slaughter!

by: Herco from: Mostar
June 04, 2010 14:53
Republika Srpska was formed at the end of the War in Bosnia & Herzegovina in 1995 by the the US and NATO in the Dayton Accords peace process. It comprised of all the territory controlled by the forces of Radovan Karadžić (VRS) at basically that exact period of the war. Karadžić committed wide-scale ethnic cleansing and genocide upon the Bosnian Muslim population in the areas he controlled. It is known that 250,000 men, women and children were murdered by Karadžić's forces, while 45,000 women were systematically raped in war crime and over 2,000,000 were displaced.

Karadžić's VRS sought to split Bosnia & Herzegovina along ethnic lines in order to create an ethnically and religiously pure Greater Serbian superstate.

Republika Srpska (literally meaning the Republic of the Serbs) still exists today and comprises exactly 49% of the territory of Bosnia & Herzegovina (Serbs only make up 37% of the population). It was born out of the aggression and genocide perpetrated by the Serbo-fascists Karadžić, Milošević and Mladić. Yet the corrupt premier Milorad Dodik and the other Republika Srpska politicians wish for their illegal ethnic quasi-parastate to secede from Bosnia & Herzegovina as recognised and acknowledged in their international borders. This is a disgrace. Giving any legitimacy to the maintenance of Republika Srpska is basically congratulating these Serbs for the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in their quest for an ethnically and religiously pure Serbian state.

Republika Srpska is illegal and has been founded on genocide. It must be disintegrated for Bosnia & Herzegovina as an independent European nation to continue to move forward.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
June 06, 2010 16:37
Right you are, Herce, you are there, on locationyou know what you're talking about much more than any diaspora chetniks who only have absorbed hate of Bosniaks with their mothers' milk. And, if it is true that by 2018 or 2020 the Bosniaks will be the majority in Bosnia then they stand a good chance of winning back their country, but they must do it themselves, nobody is going to give back to the Bosniaks what Karadzic and his henchmen stole from them. Now there will be those who say that "Bosnia-Herzegovina does not belong to the Bosniaks alone" or some such and I won't disagree, but that does not mean that there can be territories lablede "Serb-only, Muslims and dogs not allowed" and it does not give the Bosnian Serbs or anybody else any right to carve out even one square millimeter of the territory by expelling all non-Serbs or "others" and seek to annex that territory to another country, or to divide Bosnia-Herzegovina by expelling part of the population and erasing all traces of their presence, as the Bosnian Serbs have done, NOT the Bosniaks, and any claims that "the Bosniaks are as guilty or more of the war as the Serbs" only show the malice and hatred of those who utter them.

by: Abdulmajid
June 08, 2010 11:44
The islamophobic hatemonger who gave himself the very appropriate nick of "medicine against jihad" wrote: "It's hard to talk to you and other Muslim radicals, your brains are wired on a different frequency. No wonder why the free world is afraid of people like you. "
Another attempt by a crackpot islamophobe to delegitimize and demonize the Bosniaks or all Muslims. So according to you I am crazy because I object to the Serb genocidal anti-Bosniak crusade and I am "the free world is afraid of me"? So we must be put down and it was good that you had the Serbs to do the dirty work? Someone like you would stand by and watch my bretheren shot in the back and dumped in a mass grave, if you don't have the guts to pick up a gun yourself and participate in the next massacre of Bosniaks, and then walk away from it and convince yourself that it is part of a "just and holy war" against "terrorists". And then you will say there never was a genocide of Bosniaks in Bosnia! No, it is fearmongers and hatemongers like you who try to demonize the Muslims in general and delegitimize the Bosniaks in particular. There was a name for the likes of you in the 1930s. Then it was against the Jews, now it's against the Muslims. Islamophobes are the fascists of today and there is no neeed of you to deny that you are one. ANd don't say "teh Orthodox aren't suicide bombers!" Neither are the Bosniaks and that there are suicide bombers elsewhere is NOT RELEVANT HERE! It is teh Islamophobes who are teh nutcases here! Because they try to legitimize mass murder and portray the victims of mass murder as criminals! Let me wise you up buddy, the Cross will never chase the Crescent from Bosnia!

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Afghan Parliament OKs Security Pact

Latest Comment (1 total)

donky kong: No surprise. Both candidates support this too. Choosing between Obama or Romney is ... More

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (24 total)

Rafi: There's no need to bring in a straw man, and make me say ... More

Brzezinski Calls Putin Rule 'Anachronism'

Latest Comment (4 total)

Batanage:
Look who is Talking now, Brezenski the hypocrite.

The guy who spread fundemetelists around ... More