map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Commentary

Unfinished Business In The Balkans

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden (right) is welcomed to Sarajevo by Bosnian Foreign Minister Sven Alkalaj.

Last updated (GMT/UTC): 20.05.2009 07:21
By Nenad Pejic
EU foreign-policy chief Javier Solana indicated recently to reporters that his upcoming trip to the Balkans with U.S. Vice President Joe Biden would be an unprecedented show of unity.

"This will be an important meeting," Solana said. "This will be the first that together, the Americans and the Europeans, at that level, do go to Bosnia and express their common intentions to all the leaders of that country."

Solana also underscored the EU's leadership role in the Balkans. Although that may have been a politically correct thing to say, reality on the ground tells a different story.

It has been nine years since Yugoslav strongman Slobodan Milosevic was ousted, a decade since the NATO military intervention in Kosovo, and 14 years since the Dayton agreement brought a fragile halt to the fighting in Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Through it all, one thing has been clear: From the very beginning -- stretching back to the crises of the late 1980s and unproductive talks with the leadership of Yugoslavia, through the various "observer" missions that did little more than observe the collapse of one country after another into violence and war, and up to the present day, the EU has never had a vision on how to move forward in the Balkans. Various EU members have adopted differing, sometimes contradictory, policies in the Balkans; different European countries have supported various Yugoslav successor states at different times.

As a result, the best the EU can hope to achieve today is to maintain a dissatisfying status quo. Europe today is unable to resolve its own security issues, much less focus on the Balkans. As Edward Joseph wrote in "Foreign Policy," "Brussels is indifferent at best, and divided at worst, when it comes to the pressing issues in the Balkans."

So Biden's visit, which began in Sarajevo on May 19 and proceeds to Belgrade and Pristina later in the week, brings the hope that yet another "reset button" will soon be pressed and that the United States will again take up the unfinished business in the Balkans. The new U.S. administration wants to bring "a new focus, a new sense of energy, a new activism with regard to Bosnia-Herzegovina and the region as a whole," U.S. Ambassador to Bosnia Charles English said last week.

U.S. 'Reset' In The Balkans

The key to the Balkans today is Bosnia. The central government there is being dangerously undermined by the separatist policies of the Republika Srpska, the country's ethnic-Serbian entity, and by the disastrous policies of the Sarajevo-based authorities. Tolerance of ethnic, religious, and cultural diversity in Bosnia today is far lower than it was in the prewar-Yugoslavia period.

Biden addresses Bosnian parliament in Sarajevo on May 19.
The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed a resolution calling for constitutional reform in Bosnia and the naming of a special envoy to the region who would be tasked with facilitating reforms at all levels of Bosnian government and society. Fearing this would mean a new U.S. push to strengthen central authority at the expense of the country's so-called entities, Bosnian Serbs are opposing increased U.S. involvement and the naming of a U.S. envoy (interestingly, no one has ever protested against EU involvement).

Former Bosnian Serb soldiers have announced protests, distributed flyers, and tacked up posters opposing more U.S. involvement in the Balkans. Serbian nationalists in Belgrade are on the same page, opposing a strong Bosnian state because their ultimate goal is for the Republika Srpska to secede.

Perhaps the key event for evaluating Biden's trip to the Balkans is not the visit to Sarajevo, but the May 20 stopover in Belgrade. If the region is to be stabilized, Serbia must take steps to accept the integrity and sovereignty of Bosnia. Serbian President Boris Tadic must make it clear that Bosnia's Serbs must seek solutions to their problems in Sarajevo and not in Belgrade.

Croatia made this step eight years ago and it marked the beginning of the process by which Bosnia's Croats ceased to think of themselves merely as an ethnic group but also as citizens of Bosnia. Bosnia's Serbs have not even begun this process.

Political Will Needed


Experts say Biden will ask Belgrade to encourage Serbs in Bosnia and in Kosovo to engage with the central authorities in Sarajevo and Pristina, respectively. But both Tadic and Bosnian Serb Prime Minister Milorad Dodik -- who were both once darlings of the United States and the EU -- have been moving steadily toward the nationalists and away from European integration. Various world leaders and envoys keep coming to the Balkans and urging reform. But while they depart and are replaced, Bosnia's leaders -- and its problems -- remain the same.

Jonathan Eyal, of Britain's Kings Institute, tells RFE/RL that U.S. President Barack Obama has put Biden in charge of the Balkans. Eyal thinks the U.S. administration will try not to get bogged down in small crises as they occur but will focus on finding solutions for the entire region.

But to make progress, Biden will have to secure the political will of his hosts, the same people who have manifestly not demonstrated that will in recent years. It would seem that the prospects of NATO and EU membership -- and the doors to these organizations have been open to the Balkans countries for years -- are not enticing enough.

The question of this political will is even more uncertain when one considers Russia's involvement in the region. Moscow already controls the oil sector in Serbia and Bosnia and is building pipelines in the region. It provides diplomatic support for the Serbian position on Kosovo, and has regular contacts with the leadership of the Republika Srpska in Banja Luka. Bosnia's Serbs recently refused to participate in NATO-led military exercises in Georgia.

But a failure to "reset" the reform process in Bosnia is fraught with danger. The country is at risk of becoming an economic colony of its neighbors. Without the possibility of EU membership, the country will remain what it is now -- unwelcome in the region, dysfunctional, and deeply divided between aggrieved Muslims, frustrated Serbs, and endangered Croats. It will remain a safe haven for crime and a threat to European security.

Nenad Pejic is associate director of broadcasting for RFE/RL. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
     
Comments
by: Abdul Majid
June 02, 2009 15:45
Stefan:
so you say Islam is a destructive force? What has Islam destroyed? The Christians in the Balkans? No, the Turks let them thrive. Or else why would there be so many? Do you mean to say that it was all right to try to destroy and expel the Bosniaks because you "will not submit to them?" To you it seems only a dead Muslim is a good Muslim. You want to kill or exopel them just because they are Muslims. What a hateful mind you must have. Who would want to live with people like you? Then I wish you that you suffer in your own flesh the fate that you accord my side.
Let me wise you up buddy, the Bosniaks are NOT quitting Bosnia. You people would be very well advised to arrange and reconcile yourselves with the Bosniaks. Or have you never heard the old saying "you must shake the hand which you can't cut off". In about 10 years there will be an absolute majority of Bosniaks in Bosnia, that is, more than 67% of its population. What do you want to do with them, kill and expel them, or fence them in in a Balkan version of the Gaza Strip, and eventually destroy them? And you really think that you can do it? Or that the Russians will help you?

by: Abdulmajid
June 02, 2009 10:23
Islam is NOT a destructive force, YOU SERBS are! Islam has a highly-developed culture and preserved the Greco-Roman cultural heritage during the Dark Ages. The Turks did NOT destroy you Serbs, they let you thrive and it is because of them that there are any Serbs in Bosnia at all. You had NO right WHATSOEVER to take REVENGE on the Bonsniaks for what the Turks, the Austrohungarians, the Ustase or the Nazis did, but that was only a subrterfuge for your LAND GRAB to build GREATER SERBIA on GENOCIDE, and the day of reckoning will come. Just like in Kosovo, the Bosniaks will be the MAJORITY in their country, and HOW are you going to conquer it then? With military force? Then YOU will get the wrong end of the stick - again!
You demonize Islam and Muslims and say that they are infrahuman, terrorists, bandits, just like the Russian say so it is right for you to exterminate or expel them, and to destroy their cultural landmarks? Then be damned! Who do you think you are? The Chosen people? Chosen to do what? To kill, rape and rob all those whom you don't like or whose land you want to take? Well, let me tell you: THE CROSS WILL NEVER CHASE THE CRESCENT FROM BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA!!!

by: Stefan from: Banja Luka
June 01, 2009 05:10
Nobody in Europe knows better than the Serbs what a destructive force Islam is. We will never submit to any Muslims. These people where our kin until the Turks came and brought this terrible religion to the Balkans. Now the secular west supports them for their own imperialistic intentions and opposition to a strengthening Russia.

by: Abdul Majid
May 28, 2009 21:22
Oh, YES!
The open and unremitting hostility of Russia towards the Bosniaks and the Kosovo Albanians is very well known. And like the Chechens they demonize them as "terrorists and bandits", like they already did in the 19th century. And as for Fikret Abdic as the Bosnian Ramazan Kadyrov, OK I admit that it is not my thinking, but the one who stated this abominable idea here before is a well-known apologist and defender of Russian imperialism who has often posted incredible propaganda lies and preposterous islamophobic and anti-Bosniak statements on these pages. You know who I mean (Mike whatsisname? Mihail...er...thingy?), until a few days back I thought he is Russian, now I have seen his web page and know he is based in NYC; in the 1950s he would have been an apologist of Stalinism, so now he is for Milosevic and Putin.
When mentioning those who try to whitewash, belittle, relativize or openly deny the genocide committed against the Bosniaks: they say, "Bosnian Serbs will never be ruled by Muslims". With that statement they say that Muslims are lesser human beings if not outright infrahuman. Thus they have confessed that they are racists and Islamophobes.
They say "All nations were founded on genocide." So to them it was perfectly normal and legitimate of the Bosnian Serbs with the help of Serbia proper to commit genocide. Then they need not be offended if I call them genocidal. Besides that, this shows clearly how deep their ideas are rooted in the Dark Ages.
They say that the Bosniaks fired the first shots. So what? On December 7th, 1941 who fired the first shots? The Americans did: The destroyer "USS Ward" shot up and sank a Japanese midget submarine that was trying to sneak into Pearl Harbor. And weren't they in the right? Does this make the Japanese less of an aggressor? Certainly not. The Americans had no plans to attack Japan, but Japan had planned its aggression carefully and meticulously for yeaers in advance. And so did the Serbs. Besides that, that the first victims of the Bosnian war were a Serb wedding party, for waving their flag, is a lie. Prior to that incident, the first victims of war were Suada Dilberovic, and the Bosniaks murdered by Arkan's henchmen in Bijeljina.
People like that should be made to suffer in their own flesh what they whish for my side. Or worse. Much worse.
And don't ever try to justify your genocidal crusade. Serbia is GUILTY of aggression and genocide, as are all Serbs who took part in it and all those who knew what was happening and did nothing against it, and still pretend not to know. And they will have to live with this stain FOREVER.

by: Peter
May 28, 2009 07:43
No no no no no, and still no. Russia is totally irrelevant in this. The Serbs are Russia's allies, not our proxies. This is not about Russia. This was NEVER about Russia. Can the readers of this website please stop seeing what isn't there

by: Abdul Majid
May 19, 2009 20:51
Well, if it were up to the Russians I believe they would very much like to turn Bosnia into another Chechnya, with Fikret Abdic as a sort of Bosnian Ramazan Kadyrov, at least judging from comments by that great apologist of the Greater Orthodox Co-Prosperity Sphere, and by all news articles on the Russian Television web site, which echo, parrot and repeat the view-point of denialists and serbofascists ("there was no genocide in Bosnia, there are al Qaida terrorists out and about in Bosnia, Muslims are terrorists and bandits who must be kept in tight check or subdued or put down, there were no 8.000 Bosniak victims in Srebrenica but rather 3000 Serb ones; the Bosniaks committed the same atrocities, to the same degree, in the same numbers, no less, than the Serbs, so they are exactly as guilty blah blah blah"). Because the Russians see the Bosniaks exactly as the Chechens: as ungrateful traitors to the Slavic race, bandits, terrorists who must be subdued, and if they can't be exterminated at least they must be placed under the knute of such a co-opted tyrant and satrap as Ramazan Kadyrov is. In the Bosnian case this would be Fikret Abdic; it is only good that for the moment he has been removed from the political scene. Stalin may be dead but his spirit is still very much alive. I have always despided Russian imperialism and I always will.

by: DefenderOfTruth
May 19, 2009 15:49
Excellent article regarding to problems facing Bosnia and Herzegovina today. The citizens of the country are being held hostage by politicians whose only goal is to enrich themselves and their cronies while staying in power. Politicians constantly use ethnicity, religion, and fear to keep people in "pre-war" state of terror where they are unable to vote based on reason but instead vote based on their emotions. A similar situation occurred in the US after Septermber 11. Bush and his advisors used the fear that was instilled in people to push forth an aggressive nationalist agenda which many informed citizens opposed but were overruled by the frightened majority. Serbia has not given up on its plan to create a "Greater Serbian" state despite what Tadic and his cronies say in public their private talk with Dodik and their actions have been consistently anti-Bosnia and pro-Greater Serbia. Miosevic's ghost can still be felt in Belgrade where "moderate" Serb politicians have accepted Serbo-fascist ideology and are trying to achieve it through diplomacy instead of force the way it was done in the 90s. The EU and US need to become more involved in putting pressure on the Serb leadership to stay our of Bosnian affairs and a good way to do this is by quickly accepting Bosnia into NATO and telling the Serb government that any continued subversion of the Bosnian state will be treated as an attack on national sovereignty and security and will not be accepted. The Bosnian Serbs are citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina and that is the country that they need to strengthen for their own good and that of all the other Bosnian citizens.
     
TEXT SIZE - +

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile