Thursday, February 16, 2012


Features

What Eastern Europe Needs Most Is Clear EU Policy, Economist Says

"No arbitrary banking" -- a protest outside the Lviv branch of the National Bank of Ukraine, which Berglof describes as "very exposed."
TEXT SIZE - +
By Kathleen Moore
* Clarification Appended

The subprime of Europe. Ripe for a financial meltdown. Recent news reports have depicted in often dramatic terms the crisis hitting Central and Eastern Europe.

And little wonder. The region is experiencing slowing growth, slumping production, a drying up of credit and -- in several cases -- plummeting currencies. And there have also been concerns that Western European banks could be at risk because of lending to the East.

Those hit earliest and hardest include Latvia, whose GDP plummeted 10.5 percent in the last quarter of 2008 and was one of the first to get emergency aid from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

But the region is wide and varied and also includes the -- relatively -- robust Czech Republic.
Read the full transcript of the Erik Berglof interview here.


"It's a difficult period. Having said that, in terms of what they have experienced to date in many ways it's not much worse -- or in terms of growth it's less [badly hit] -- than Western Europe," says Erik Berglof, the chief economist of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).

But Berglof says that the worry is what the next year will bring to the region. What's important, he says, is that "there is a policy response and that there is some degree of coordination of policy response across countries."

'Clear Road Map'

A key element of that response, Berglof says, is that that West European banks, which own large chunks of the banks in Central and Eastern Europe, continue to lend to their subsidiaries. That's because the region's banks need to refinance some $130 billion of short-term debt this year.

The parent banks are, in many cases, themselves being rescued by governments across the European Union. So Berglof says he's heartened by a March 1 promise from EU leaders that the subsidiaries -- at least in the new EU states -- should be able to get a share of those rescue funds.

"That's a very important element of addressing the crisis now because these parent banks are critical to supporting the banks in the region," he says. "To date they have essentially done so, so when all other sources of finance has dried up this parent-bank link has been essentially intact."

The crisis has prompted Hungary to call for an easing of the rules for euro membership, an idea Poland says it would be happy to see happen. That idea was rejected by eurozone finance ministers this week. But Berglof says eurozone and European Central Bank (ECB) leaders can still do more to help.

"The important thing is to provide them with a clear road map toward euro accession," Berglof says. "That's incumbent on these European leaders to provide that road map, combining that with some tailored measures, for example, some support from the ECB to increase the availability of foreign exchange in some of these countries that are on the path to euro accession."

Ukraine 'Very Vulnerable'

Ukraine has been hit particularly hard by the crisis and is one of several that have turned to the IMF for help.

"I think Ukraine is possibly the most exposed country at the moment," Berglof says, "it was very exposed because of its reliance on a few industries particularly steel, you also had very large exposure in terms of foreign exchange in the corporate and household sectors."

He says a pressing problem now is Ukraine's "politically difficult" situation as well as the fact some key positions at the National Bank and Finance Ministry are unfilled.

As part of its response to the crisis, the EBRD, along with the World Bank and the European Investment Bank, late last month announced a $31-billion aid package for business and banks in the region.

* The 10th paragraph of this story has been reworded to clarify Poland's position on euro membership.
World Economic Crisis
 

Multimedia coverage on the impact of the global financial crisis on markets and individuals across RFE/RL's broadcast region. More

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
March 14, 2009 03:08
Are leading EU's finance bosses members of secret elite that rule the World?

To what degree they, Illuminate, Masons and Her Magesty are missguided by plot of imperial resurectors and Russia blocade?

There is no future in contingencies of such blocade-organizers.

The future in rizing Liberte, Egalite and Dignite in Caucasian World at large, not in deviding Europe between Russia and Germano-Austria...

Konstantin.

by: Louis-Jacques Sereville
March 14, 2009 04:00
As long as I remember, Poland did not call for an easing of the rules for euro membership. Far from it, Poland rejected the idea. Am I wrong, or Ms Kathleen Moore, the reporter, is wrong?

by: Maciej Skiba
March 14, 2009 04:56
Poland never called for the easing of the euro membership, it said it would welcome it if the EU was to accept Hungary's proposal however they never themselves lobbied for it. Im sure many other countries in eastern Europe would welcome it also. Its a small mistake however, its the job of the media to make sure they report properly.

The reason this small detail can be significant is that it might signify that Poland feels its in trouble and so it is pressuring the EU for easier entry. In this economic crisis we are in, where speculation is rampant, small details like this can make a differance.

by: rkka from: USA
March 14, 2009 12:06
Ukraine is the most vulnerable, because it is ever more evident that Ukraine is incapable of sustaining itself without large subsidy from Russia. In the absence of another willing subsidized, Ukraine spirals ever-downward.

This fact illustrates the extreme un-wisdom of the Russophobic policy of the Ukrainian President, who has gone out of his way to insult and injure the interests of the country that has heretofore paid Ukraine's bills.

by: Patkatav Dupeto
March 14, 2009 16:37
Ukraine for the Moldovans!

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
March 14, 2009 22:06
The easy EU membership was denied by some countries in Eastern Europe as matters of principals.
However, it is prudent to adjust it for economical crises times, for benefit of both Eastern and Western Europe.

To the Russian RKK ("Revolutionary Kontrol
Kommission") of Russia in USA:
Ukraine is not subsidized by Russia.
Ukraine sent all its industries and its employees to Russia during WW2 to supply and to fight War.
Russia didn't return industries (and enslaved Ukrainians) back to Ukraine after the War but staffed Eastern Ukraine by even more Russian occupiers and settlers.
Also Russia expropriated secretly most of resources from USSR republics for Russia that add to trillions, mostly invested in Russia and Siberia - but refused to return it to CIS countries, including Ukraine.
Not withstanding Ukraine's shear of property and energy resources in Russia and Siberia, denied by Russia, Russians overprize Gas, stolen from Tartarstan and the rest of CIS, to an unaccaptable degree.
On the top of it Russian occupiers and Quislings-Bolshevics in Eastern Ukraine, not unlike they did during "Golodomor", help Russia starve Ukraine, this time energy-wise, posing as "Regions":
They refuse to use available in Eastern Ukraine by-produce of coal and oil for hitting, as was usually used in former USSR, but overburn overpriced by Russia Tartar gas, refuse to pay for it, and deliberately dragging Ukraine to default - to be slaves of Russia!

To typical Russian Chauvinistic statements of "DUP-ETO":

What?!

Konstantin.

by: Baz from: England
March 16, 2009 11:28
Ukraine would be more than capable of sustaining itself if it had not been so badly damaged by years of Russian domination and mismanagement. Ukraine is not unique in its anti-Russianism. Is it any coincidence just about every ex-communist country is anti-Russia - that speaks for itself. Russia has only itself to blame for anti-Russianism.

by: Martin Bright
March 16, 2009 13:34
Baz and Konstantin
Until I know, antirussianism in Ukraine only have a foothold in western Ukraine, and in some pro-US politicians. And if you compare Belarus and Ukraine, both of whom receive subsidized gas from Russia, who is doing better?
Don´t let your anti-russianism obscure your mind. The grim situation Ukraine faces now is the result of botched political decisions by ukrainian politicians.
After all, we in the west don´t blame the roman empire or charlemagne for our politicians misdeeds. Blame Kuchma, Yuschenko and the like, who got the power to reform Ukraine´s economy but choose not to do so. And blame the irresponsible policies of western european banks, who overstep their lending to East European countries.
I am so sorry for the east european people who must pay a high price for other´s mistakes

by: Mario from: USA
March 16, 2009 14:47
Hunger for Croatia's Adriatic coast and land is not fair. But Slovenia now a part of the EU gang, is not the only country, EU's land grab crime is lower then we as a free people can prosses. This is an example of a richer country taking from a poorer country's resources. If this poorer country says anything, then the richer country calls his gang (the EU countries) and they try to intimidate Croatia into giving in.

One of many examples. EU warned Croatia, no its bully' Titoist-style leaders in Croatia for Adriatic coast and fishing in Croatia's waters. Slovene and EU fishermen like to be able to go about their business unhindered in Croatian waters. What is sad about all this, is the fact that Italy and Slovenia, now a part of the EU gang, disallow Croatia from fishing in their waters, yet they create a storm if Croatia wishes to place the same regulations on their own waters. And open and clear intention to claim Croatian state territory, namely territory over which the Republic of Croatia has sovereign rights and jurisdiction. EU gang, disallow Croatia INA oil company from concession to drill for oil and gas in the Croatian territory of Adriatic. Slovenia and EU like to claim oil and gas territory of Adriatic for EU.

by: Louis-Jacques Sereville
March 17, 2009 03:37
Konstantin,

It is easing of the euro, the common currency, membership - not easing of the EU membership - that was denied. It is only Poland - not plural Eastern European countries - that denied the easing of the euro membership. Don’t misunderstand.

---
Konstantin, Baz, and Martin,

You will keep misunderstanding Ukraine as long as you keep swallowing one-sided historical view. In fact, it is series of misunderstandings and mistrusts between Poles and Ukrainians (i.e. Cossacks), not the ill-minded Poles' deeds as asserted by Ukrainians and present-day Russians, that realised independence of the state of Ukraine in the 17th century. The similar can be said for the 17th century Russo-Polish Wars. The powerful figures in Ukraine and Russia have been politically exploiting the incorrect historical view to maintain their influence ever since. So, who have been happy during the czardom, communist regime and after? At least neither the ordinary Ukrainians nor ordinary Russians appear. Even the rich there do not seem to have been able to sleep well, either. Causes and results of chauvinism are always like above.
Comments page of 2
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Tehran ‘Ready’ For Nuclear Talks

Latest Comment (1 total)

Gar: The U.N and the NATO allies are total suckers if they go back ... More

Russia Sets Weapons Export Record

Latest Comment (2 total)

Eugenio: How interesting :-). It's just that the other day I read a really ... More

Kosovo Serbs Defy Serbia, EU With Vote

Latest Comment (2 total)

Ruben: There is no "defying".

Belgrade still pays their salaries and needs them to ... More