Thursday, May 23, 2013


Georgia

To Recognize Or Not To Recognize Abkhazia? That Is Vanuatu's Question

Very few people have heard of Vanuatu. But despite its obscurity, the tiny Pacific island nation has found itself in the middle of a behind-the-scenes struggle between Russia and the West.
Very few people have heard of Vanuatu. But despite its obscurity, the tiny Pacific island nation has found itself in the middle of a behind-the-scenes struggle between Russia and the West.

Related Articles

Tuvalu, Abkhazia Cozy Up

Officials of Georgia's breakaway region of Abkhazia and the tiny Polynesian island nation of Tuvalu have signed an agreement on visa-free travel between between the two territories.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Courtney Brooks
UNITED NATIONS -- Here's a quick pop quiz: Does Vanuatu recognize Abkhazia?

Wait, what?

You know, Vanuatu. It's a small island nation in the Pacific. Does it recognize Georgia's breakaway region of Abkhazia as an independent country?

Don't know? Well, don't worry. Apparently neither does Vanuatu. The country's foreign minister says "yes," it does. The head of its United Nations division says "no," it doesn't. And its UN ambassador says he can't say for sure.

As obscure as this all seems, it is actually part of a high-stakes geopolitical struggle between Russia and the West.

Four years ago, on August 26, 2008, Russia became the first country to recognize Abkhazia and another pro-Moscow separatist territory, South Ossetia, as independent states. The move followed Russia's brief war with Georgia earlier that month.

The United States and the European Union criticized the move and responded by reaffirming their commitment to Georgia's "territorial integrity."

Since then, the lobbying, coaxing, and cajoling from both sides has only intensified.
 
"The United States is not backing down from its view that Abkhazia and South Ossetia should be part of Georgia," says Lincoln Mitchell, a professor of international politics at Columbia University and author of the book "Uncertain Democracy: U.S. Foreign Policy and Georgia's Rose Revolution." "And Russia is not backing down from its view that these countries are independent."

'Miscommunication'

Vanuatu stepped into this maelstrom in May 2011 when the country's foreign minister, Alfred Carlot, announced that his country had granted Abkhazia -- but not South Ossetia -- its recognition.
 
Until, that is, Vanuatu decided it hadn't, or wasn't sure if it had. Shortly after Carlot's announcement, Vanuatu's UN ambassador, Donald Kalpokas, said the country had not, in fact, recognized Abkhazia.

x
Carlot responded to this by posting a video on YouTube on June 9, 2011, in which he insisted that recognition had, indeed, been granted, saying that the confusion was the result of "miscommunication between our Ministry of Foreign Affairs and our UN representation in New York."

But the confusion -- and miscommunication -- appears to have persisted.

Speaking to RFE/RL in May 2012, Kalpokas admitted that he just didn't know one way or another.

“Well, we here don’t have any position on it -- whether to recognize or not recognize Abkhazia -- it’s somewhere [that] we don’t know,” he said.
 
Kalpokas hung up the phone when asked why the issue was so controversial.
 
But in an interview with RFE/RL in July, Johnny George Koanapo, head of the United Nations division of Vanuatu's Foreign Ministry, said the country has definitely not recognized Abkhazia.

"I think what's confused a lot of people in the past was the fact that the government, the head of the government, had expressed the intention to maintain dialogue with Abkhazia," Koanapo said. "And that's different from having an official position in terms of the approval by the Council of Ministers to establish diplomatic relations with Abkhazia. That's not happened."

Koanapo added that he had consulted Carlot, the foreign minister, who made the initial announcement of recognition, before making his comments.

Chaotic Politics

Well, that ought to have cleared things up. Except somebody forgot to tell Abkhazia.

The territory's de facto deputy foreign minister, Irakly Khintba, told RFE/RL that the Abkhaz government has a document signed by the prime minster of Vanuatu establishing diplomatic relations and that Abkhazia has received no indication that it has been revoked.

The parliament of Vanuatu in Port Vila
The parliament of Vanuatu in Port Vila
So just what is going on here?

Part of the confusion can be explained by Vanuatu's chaotic politics. The country has had three prime ministers in the first six months of 2012.

Anny Wong, who wrote Freedom House's 2011 report on Vanuatu, said the island nation's politics are "messy" and riddled with personal feuds that hinder -- and often paralyze -- cohesive policymaking.

"It's personality driven," Wong told RFFE/RL in an e-mail. "And what one side says is right, the other will always say it is wrong."

Carlot and Kalpokas, himself a former prime minister, hail from rival political parties. And Carlot studied at Russia's elite diplomatic academy, the Moscow State Institute of International Relations, which could explain his position on Abkhazia.

Also, Vanuatu has some history of peddling diplomatic recognition to the highest bidder.

In 2004, it briefly severed relations with China and recognized Taiwan, after reportedly being offered $30 million in aid. A month later, Vanuatu switched back, severing relations with Taipei and restoring them with Beijing after the prime minister who orchestrated the deal with Taiwan was forced from office.

'Checkbook Diplomacy'

Georgia's ambassador to the UN, Alexander Lomaia, says Russia is engaging in "checkbook diplomacy" to win recognition for Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

Moscow has, indeed, managed to entice a handful of countries -- Nicaragua, Venezuela, and the Pacific Islands of Nauru and Tuvalu -- to recognize both territories, in some cases with the help of large aid packages.
 
Shortly after Venezuela recognized the regions, it was handed a $2 billion investment aimed at boosting military sales from Russia, according to press reports. Nauru and Nicaragua also received multimillion-dollar aid packages shortly after their recognition. The numbers vary, but the Russian daily "Kommersant" reported that Moscow gave Nauru $50 million. 

But despite Russia's efforts at enticement, financial or otherwise, to win recognition for the territories, there are also powerful deterrents.

Washington and Brussels have deployed their considerable diplomatic muscle against recognition. And the Western powers have been joined in their efforts by China, which is reluctant to encourage recognition of any separatist regions lest it set a precedent for Taiwan.

Juris Gulbis, Abkhazia's de facto ambassador to the Pacific and Caribbean, said there has been "constant interference" from the United States in the territory's efforts to win diplomatic recognition from countries in the region.

"There is great pressure on...Vanuatu, Tuvalu, and Nauru to unrecognize Abkhazia," Gulbis said, adding that Washington is "withholding aid" to the countries over the issue.

Support For Georgia's 'Integrity'

A U.S. State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Washington has not withheld aid to any country over recognition of the separatist territories, but has been clear about its position on the issue.

"We strongly support Georgia's sovereignty and territorial integrity within its international recognized borders [and] we have shared our views around the world, including with countries in the Pacific Islands region, on numerous occasions and at the highest levels," the official said.

Likewise, Christopher Matthews, spokesman for the European Union's mission to the UN, told RFE/RL that Brussels regularly “reminds its partners and interlocutors" that the EU supports Georgia's territorial integrity.

As a result, as Columbia University's Mitchell explains, Russia has been unable to convince even close allies like Belarus to recognize the separatist Georgian territories.

"Why would you want to go out and pick a fight with the EU, China, and the U.S.?" Mitchell asks. "it's one thing to say you want to pick a fight with the U.S. -- that's where you get Nicaragua in there. But to throw China in there as well -- that's a powerful group of countries saying, 'You know what? On balance, [we] do not recognize this and we don't want you to.' That's a pretty powerful incentive to just not recognize them."

Abkhaz Ambassador Gulbis is nevertheless upbeat. He says Abkhazia is expecting several more declarations of recognition from the Pacific and Caribbean.

It's not clear if one of them will result from Vanuatu changing its mind yet again.


RFE/RL's Georgian Service contributed to this report
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: American Troll
August 26, 2012 19:07
The long-term planning behind this is ingenious. As sea levels rise, these island micro-states can now safely evacuate to a highland redoubt in the Caucasus. As climate refugees from still-fecund cultures, they reinvigorate two infertile societies stuck in demographic free-fall, all while earning humanitarian accolades for Russia for making it possible. Everybody wins.

by: Vakhtang from: Moscow
August 27, 2012 01:30
On the orders of Putin and the russian taxpayers' money, to the territory of Abkhazia abkhaz criminals organized importation of arab terrorists from Syria...and settled them in a Georgian houses...

Foreign Minister Lavrov, who is actually the аrmenian from Tbilisi -Kalantarov and who was appointed by Putin on this post because of his pathological hatred for Georgians- received the order and the money to buy the recognition of Abkhazia and Ossetia bandits by microstates...to use the term- partially recognized states..
.We see that Putin is ready to make a meanness and disgusting actions against the Georgian people, which he hates.

Therefore, Georgia and its allies need to tell more truth about the аbkhazian and оssetian bandits about killings of Georgian women, old people and children,about the burning of Georgian kindergartens, nurseries and libraries... about racism, nazism, banditry, which are established in the occupied Georgian territory..
Raise the issue at the UN, can be such recognition bought for the money -legitimate...
In Response

by: greg from: virginia
August 29, 2012 18:40
Very articulate Vakhtang, and nicely done! Have you considered a job with the Azeri foreign ministry? They could definitely use your writing skills in composiing diplomatic communication depicting the Armenians of NKR (and the rest of the world for that matter) in the same light you cast the people - sorry - imported, child killing criminals - "occupying" the Georgian territory of Abkhazia and S Ossetia. As the Rwandan Hutus used to say about their tutsi neighbors during national radio broadcasts, nothing but "Cockroaches". Right? Get the US and EU to stand by while the government goes in and cleans the cockroaches out, right?
In Response

by: A.Marchan from: Syria
September 15, 2012 14:08
Syrians are not terrorists at first , all the people who came from Syria to Abkhazia are abkhazian originally ,,,, but it so clear who is the terrorist here ... you said importation while you're talking about people ..... scened... you said Georgia and its allies ... you can ask anyone in this world a bout th crimes of your Georgia allies in Afghanistan, Iraq , Libya ... why you don't just leave abkhazians and let them built their country .. and stop posting lies about them

by: Eugenio from: Vienna
August 27, 2012 04:30
I would like to use this occasion in order to once again congratulate the people of Georgia for the fact that they so skillfully managed to restore their territorial integrity in August 2008 - and this in the face of powerless Russian imperialism!
And a special thank goes, of course, to Mischa Saakaschwili - a wise leader that any nation of the world would want to have as their president :-)).
In Response

by: Sey from: World
August 27, 2012 07:21
Well, that's an overtly incorrect statement. Georgia did not restore its territorial integrity, in fact it was Misha's so thoughtlessly planned military strategy that resulted in it losing its integrity instead.


In Response

by: Eugenio from: Vienna
August 28, 2012 14:30
Really, Sey, echt? Georgia did not restore its territorial integrity in 2008 :-)))??? I mean, Sey, check the dictionary for such notions as "irony" or "sarcasm", you know, those might be useful in the future :-)).

by: Ionas Aurelian Rus from: Cincinnati, USA
September 01, 2012 16:07
The article does not state everything that it could because it does not explain why those from Vanuatu who recognized Abkhazia did not recognize South Ossetia. Abkhazian independence is acceptable if and only if Russian troops, etc., are pulled out from Abkhazia, and Abkhazia would be truly independent. The Abkhazian leadership in the past did desire independence as opposed to union with Russia. This can not be said about South Ossetia, which wants to unite with North Ossetia as a part of Russia.

All the best,

Ionas Aurelian Rus
In Response

by: jstuxx from: Kosovska Mitrovica
September 05, 2012 16:21
Oh really, Kosovo is recognized, and considered truly independent but it has foreign troops. In fact it has the largest foreign US military base in the world.

Now all of a sudden their is a big outcry for Georgia's territorial integrity, where was the outcry for Serbia's territorial integrity!!! Where was the outcry for Cyprus's territorial integrity!!!! In fact thats the biggest argument for Abkhaz independence, If Kosovo can be independent why not Abkhazia. Eveybody seems willing enough to go against Russia and China when it comes to Kosovo so I see no reason why they should not go against China, EU and US.
In Response

by: Ionas Aurelian Rus
September 08, 2012 04:03

The only part of Kosovo that Serbia deserves and should get is North Kosovo, the compact, mostly-Serbian area in the north of Kosovo. This is not to deny that, at some point in time, a majority of the population of Kosovo was ethnically Serbian. However, most of this population migrated into Habsburg territory and settled in places such as the eastern part of Banat, which used to have a Romanian ethnic minority until some point during the eighteenth century.

Ionas Aurelian Rus
In Response

by: jstuxx from: Republika Srpska
September 14, 2012 18:36
@Ionas Whenever you take out the majority the minority becomes the majority. Same thing can be said for Texas, California, New Mexico which have quite a large Mexican minority, take out the other American areas and the Mexicans are now a majority, should they join Mexico now. Republika Srpska also has a large Serb minority should they join Serbia now. Thats why a thing called International Law was created which was supposed to guarantee the territorial integrity of states, nowhere in this law did it specify that there is an exception to the law if there is a large minority, imagine the wars it would cause if that happened everywhere in the world. Let me explain to you what actually happened to the ethnic Serbs in Kosovo, after the war in 1999 most Serbs were kicked out and in 2004 the remaining Serbs were forced to leave until there were none left. To this day Serbs face persecution if they dare to return. Seems to me like the Serbs are the ones being oppressed.
In Response

by: Vakhtang from: Moscow
September 15, 2012 07:01
Hello,jstuxx from:Kosovska Mitrovica..
-------------------------------------
I want to remind, that Georgia, despite good relations with the West and the U.S.did not recognize Kosovo..
All Georgians know -that this land of Serbs and that the recognition of Kosovo by West and U.S.-this is a wrong decision..

Today, we see that the impostor Putin and thugs in power in Russia are trying to put pressure on Serbs- that Serbs recognize Abkhazia-- territory of thugs and murderers of women and children and your new рresident, did already hint at such a move.

I hope that the Serbs have enough common sense not to recognize аbkhaz looters and murderers...
In Response

by: rick
September 15, 2012 13:03
jstuxx

not only language but also History !

All west side of USA was part of MExican empire
or of United state of MExico .

So , Caifornia , Texas , New Mexico , Arizona , Nevada , Oregon

could be claimed back by mexican .

certainly USA aren't so proud of this part of their history
so they don't do any film and try to forget of it

In Response

by: jstuxx
September 16, 2012 10:50
@Vakhtang

I want to remind you that the conflict in Georgia happened directly after Kosovo declared independence, it would be foolish of Georgia to recognize Kosovo now and the US/West understands this.

I am not saying that Georgia was willfully going to recognize Kosovo's independence had it not been for Russian action, I am not saying that Georgia would have forgotten about territorial integrity had theirs not been violated. Other states also believed in territorial integrity but nevertheless they were forced to recognize Kosovo by the western powers. Originally states like Nigeria, Malaysia, Oman were set on defending Serbia's territorial integrity, and having respect for international law but then suddenly they changed their stance and decided to recognize Kosovo. Other states: Czech Republic, Poland, Portugal, Montenegro publicly apologized to Serbia for recognition stating they were forced to by greater powers. The few remaining European states that have not recognized Kosovo: Greece, Romania, Slovakia, Spain are constantly being pressured to do so.

Actually its not only all Georgians that know that Kosovo is the land of Serbs but all Europeans actually, most Europeans (excluding Albanians and possibly Croats) are disappointed by their state's decision to recognize Kosovo.

I wouldn't say Abkhazia is a territory of thugs and murderers, same as me saying Kosovo is a territory of Albanian extremists and ethnic cleansers and church destroyers when most Albanians had nothing to do with anything, its the action's of the UCK/KLA, Albanian Mafia and the drug lords which are causing the majority of the problems. I don't think the president of Serbia will recognize Abkhazia because then he would have to recognize Kosovo as well. At least someone agree's that the actions of the West and Russia are both wrong and that its the people of Serbia and Georgia that suffer.

@rick Yes Mexicans can now claim those territories and when the USA talks about international law all they have to say is what about Kosovo.

by: rick
September 15, 2012 12:33
real question is

how is possibl that "Vanuatu" is indipendent

and abkazia or osethia or Transnistria not !?!?!
In Response

by: jstuxx from: unknown
September 15, 2012 18:29
@Vakhtang

I want to remind you that the conflict in Georgia happened directly after Kosovo declared independence, it would be foolish of Georgia to recognize Kosovo now and the US/West understands this.

I am not saying that Georgia was willfully going to recognize Kosovo's independence had it not been for Russian action, I am not saying that Georgia would have forgotten about territorial integrity had theirs not been violated. Other states also believed in territorial integrity but nevertheless they were forced to recognize Kosovo by the western powers. Originally states like Nigeria, Malaysia, Oman were set on defending Serbia's territorial integrity, and having respect for international law but then suddenly they changed their stance and decided to recognize Kosovo. Other states: Czech Republic, Poland, Portugal, Montenegro publicly apologized to Serbia for recognition stating they were forced to by greater powers. The few remaining European states that have not recognized Kosovo: Greece, Romania, Slovakia, Spain are constantly being pressured to do so.

Actually its not only all Georgians that know that Kosovo is the land of Serbs but all Europeans actually, most Europeans (excluding Albanians and possibly Croats) are disappointed by their state's decision to recognize Kosovo.

I wouldn't say Abkhazia is a territory of thugs and murderers, same as me saying Kosovo is a territory of Albanian extremists and ethnic cleansers and church destroyers when most Albanians had nothing to do with anything, its the action's of the UCK/KLA, Albanian Mafia and the drug lords which are causing the majority of the problems. I don't think the president of Serbia will recognize Abkhazia because then he would have to recognize Kosovo as well. At least someone agree's that the actions of the West and Russia are both wrong and that its the people of Serbia and Georgia that suffer.

@rick Yes Mexicans can now claim those territories and when the USA talks about international law all they have to say is what about Kosovo.
In Response

by: Anonymous
September 16, 2012 15:01
and they will respond :

"We do the international law "
In Response

by: jstuxx from: Unknown
September 16, 2012 20:45
The problem with the USA is that they have violated so many laws, unfortunately for them there were other laws which were created which they do not want broken such as nuclear non-proliferation laws because if these laws are broken USA cannot enforce them, nor can they enforce any other international law on a state which has them, in other words there is nothing the USA can do if a state has nuclear weapons, N.Korea and Iran proves this, so this US attitude of we make the laws, we break them can very easily backfire.

Most Popular