Saturday, May 26, 2012


Commentary

Waiting To Exhale In Kabul

Afghanistan’s National Environmental Protection Agency issued an advisory recommending the use of masks or other protective devices during the morning and evening rush hours in Kabul.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Helena Malikyar, Tanya Goudsouzian
Seventeenth-century Persian poet Saeb Tabrizi famously sang the praises of Kabul's lush gardens and sparkling water, extolling "the beauty of her trees" and "colorful tulips" and beseeching Allah to "protect such beauty from the evil eye of man."

Some 400 years later, the so-called king of poets must be rolling over in his tomb, as the last three decades seem to have brought much evil to this ancient city that connects Central and South Asia.

As Afghans prepare for Norouz, the ancient Zoroastrian New Year's festival heralding the beginning of spring, the stench of burning tires and leaded gasoline fills the air in lieu of the spirit of fertility and nature’s rebirth.

On the eve of the holiday, the international community offered yet another symbolic gesture toward addressing Afghanistan's critical environmental problems. U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry planted the first of the 240,000 trees that Washington has donated to Afghanistan, and the gift was graciously accepted by the mayor of Kabul as a significant contribution toward the reforestation of his city.

Unfortunately, Kabul's environmental problems cannot be solved by this horticultural donation alone. Nor can the alarming levels of air pollution be curbed by a recent government decision to make Thursdays nonworking days, thus expanding the weekend to two days. Afghan environmentalists called this act a clumsy bid to avoid effective measures while pretending to take steps.

Kabul streets are jammed with rattling jalopies, used privately or masquerading as taxis. Piles of rubbish and old tires are routinely burned for warmth by less fortunate residents and used as fuel in public bathhouses and brick kilns in the capital's suburbs.

Dramatic Deterioration

Experts agree that the government's lack of determination to implement environmental laws -- together with a lack of environmental awareness among the general populace, most of whom are grappling with urban survival -- has led to a dramatic deterioration of Kabul's once lush and fragrant urban landscape.

Emissions from old cars reportedly cause 70 to 75 percent of the air pollution in Kabul. And yet, tens of thousands of substandard, secondhand cars are imported every year. The resulting air pollution may lead directly to an estimated 3,000 annual fatalities, according to the Health Ministry. To put this in perspective, according to the United Nations, the number of reported civilian casualties in the war against the insurgency during 2010 was 2,777.
 
Pollution from a brick factory in Baghlan Province (2009 photo)

The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) says that most of the fuels used in Afghanistan do not comply with international standards and contain high levels of lead. A study carried out by the Health Ministry in 2009 showed that the blood samples of 80 percent of some 200 Kabul residents contained lead.

The city of Kabul was built with an infrastructure to support 1 million residents. It was designed to allow a maximum circulation of 75,000 cars. In 1978, the city's population was estimated to be a little over half a million. Today, there are nearly 4 million people living in the capital and more than 400,000 cars are circulating -- not counting buses, freight trucks, and vehicles operated by the military, police, NATO, and the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).

While an overabundance of older, substandard vehicles is among the chief causes of the deplorable quality of air in the Afghan capital, the problem is exacerbated by a lethal combination of gross negligence of solid and liquid waste; deforestation and the disappearance of wetlands; substandard generators built from old car engines; and the misguided use of coal, tires, and plastic for fuel.

What A Waste

Kabul's large population produces a large amount of garbage. And with no systematic garbage collection and disposal, the result is large piles of garbage on every street corner, scattered about by stray dogs during the night. In all urban centers, including Kabul, solid waste is dumped in valleys and open fields, some barely 10 kilometers from city centers. In addition to contributing to air pollution, these open landfills contaminate underground water. It costs $8 million to $10 million to construct a proper landfill, but no one has earmarked sufficient funds for this purpose.

Most of the city's hills and mountain tops are occupied by houses that lack sanitation and access to clean water. During rain and snow, runoff saturated with human waste is transported down the hills into the streets below. The mix eventually dries and is swept into the air by the wind and traffic.

By all accounts, air pollution is a potentially calamitous threat to public safety in Afghanistan. In its 2005-06 assessment, the UNEP reported that 60 percent of the population in Kabul is exposed to elevated concentrations of particulate matter, nitrous oxides, and sulphur dioxide. In the past nine years, there have been around 480,000 reported cases of respiratory illness and asthma, according to the Health Ministry.

The conditions are so dire that last year Afghanistan's National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA) issued an advisory recommending the use of masks or other protective devices during the morning and evening rush hours. NEPA's alerts and recommendations have fallen on deaf ears.

Environmental experts argue that government negligence and corruption have impeded the implementation of environmental regulations. The government, they point out, has flouted NEPA recommendations on the prohibition on importing old cars and the rigorous implementation of emissions tests. Politicians routinely succumb to pressure or enticements from business.

Chain Reactions

Environmental issues work in chain reactions. Deforestation and the mismanagement of forests in the northwest, the east, and the southeast have not only contributed to damaging the ecobalance but have also taken the livelihood from tens of thousands of people whose traditional occupations were related to forestry. This phenomenon in turn has contributed to the population explosion in the urban centers.

By contrast, the Pakistani lumber business has boomed from illegally cut and exported lumber from eastern Afghanistan. Iranian pistachios now dominate the market due to a dramatic decrease in the quality of the harvest from the northwestern pistachio farms of Afghanistan.

The Afghan cabinet on January 30 ordered the immediate formation of a special commission to investigate Kabul's air pollution, identify its causes, and make recommendations for action. Thus far, nothing has been made public about the commission's status.

What better way to start a new year than to begin contributing, in earnest, to the process of nature's renewal and to restoring fresh air to the battered capital. President Hamid Karzai's government can dispel critics by actively showing it has the political will to give precedence to the environment rather than to individual interests for economic gain.

Regulations drawn up by NEPA and UNEP ought to be implemented, rather than cosmetic measures that only serve to protect those who are benefiting from unregulated emission production. The import of old cars simply must be stopped and regular technical checks imposed.

A rigorous environmental awareness campaign must be launched through the media, the pulpit, and workshops. Afghan civil society must be mobilized to become a partner in this awareness campaign. The dangers of toxic gases emitted from old cars; leaded fuel; and burning tires, plastic, and coal must be clearly, forcefully, and sustainably pounded into the public mind. Kabul residents must have access to efficient public transportation and must be encouraged to use bicycles for short journeys. 

Finally, although environmental consciousness is a novel concept for Afghans, who have been busy fighting invaders and each other for the past three decades, the international community is well aware that today’s air pollution casualties will only increase exponentially -- if energy, resources, and imagination are not dedicated to cleaning up Afghanistan’s environment.

Helena Malikyar specializes in Afghan state-building. Tanya Goudsouzian is a journalist who has covered Afghanistan since 2001. The views expressed in this commentary are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Bill Webb from: Phoenix AZ
March 15, 2011 20:13
I recently had to take my car to the government emissions testing station. The standards are very strict. Open air burning of almost anything is almost always banned. Even though I live in the Phoenix Arizona metropolitan area, population over 3 million, the air is clean. If Kabul continues to trash the environment, I can assure you, you'll be sorry.
In Response

by: Mike from: Los Angeles
March 17, 2011 18:26
Let me ask you a couple questions Bill

-) do you think Phoenix would have the same emission standards if it were in a poor third-world country going on 30 years of war instead of a first-world country with the infrastructure and comfort to support such environmental concerns?

-) have you ever lived in an area where corruption is rife, and where what little money you can scrape together hardly even puts food on the table, much less any doctor's visits or heating supplies and there is a 30 degree difference between day and night temps dipping below freezing?

I was there working for a couple months last year and I can tell you, thank your lucky stars for your accident of birth, the infrastructure that supports you, and the choices you have to make positive change in your environment and your life. And try not to make snap value judgments about situations you haven't taken the time to learn about.

by: marga from: hamburg
March 17, 2011 12:39
If you have nothing to heat, you may also burn tyres. If you have no work, you would try to get a car to work as a taxi driver or transport company. if you find no work in your village, you try to live in the capital. if you are poor, you cannot afford to think about anything but feeding your family. Help instead of writing such ignorant comments.

by: Juan from: Doha
March 20, 2011 04:20
I think it is clear in the article that the authors are not blaming the hapless Afghans themselves but the government for falling short in making provisions for them, for instance, for failing to address the dire needs of the rural areas that has led to mass migration to urban centers, and for neglecting to improve the public transport system that would otherwise have provided a cheaper and more environmentally sound option for them... at the end, the authors are also voicing convern for the 3000+ deaths that may occur, mainly among the underprivileged, because of the deplorable air quality...
In Response

by: Brian from: Los Angeles
March 25, 2011 16:08
Blaming the Afghan officials we installed for not fixing a country ravaged by 35 years of civil war and lawlessness is silly. Granted these same officials are raping the financial resources of the country (and our aid) as well. It is Western funds that are mistagteted. It is the Western benefactors of Afghan who could easily do the most good. Instead we continue to poor money into a military solution... why? Well because it enriches Western corp interests of course!!

Latest Commentary

No records found for this widget:963

More Commentary

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Loophole Offers Legal Out For Doctor Convicted In Bin Laden Case

Latest Comment (9 total)

F*ALL: No the US can go to hell. This was blood money earned by ... More

Afghan Parliament OKs Security Pact

Latest Comment (1 total)

donky kong: No surprise. Both candidates support this too. Choosing between Obama or Romney is ... More

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (24 total)

Rafi: There's no need to bring in a straw man, and make me say ... More