Saturday, May 26, 2012


The Power Vertical

Against The Grain

Yabloko chairman Sergei Mitrokhin speaking to RFE/RL's Russian Service in September 2009.
TEXT SIZE - +
As Russia marked National Unity Day today and thousands marched in Moscow and other cities chanting nationalistic, xenophobic, and sometimes outright racist slogans, Yabloko leader Sergei Mitrokhin traveled to Kazan to send a very different message.

"We wish to emphasize that Russia is a multiethnic country, where traditionally people lived in peace and friendship for centuries. The Russian people, the Tatar people, the Bashkir people, the Udmurt people, and the Caucasian people -- Avars, Chechens, and so on," Mitrokhin said in a meeting with voters in the Tatar capital. "For us, this issue is crucial. We see a tremendous threat to those values. This can have very dangerous consequences."

And to underscore this point, Mitrokhin presented Yabloko's party platform in the Tatar and Bashkir languages as well as in Russian.

Appearing together with Aleksei Yablokov, leader of Green Russia (who is third on the Yabloko electoral list) and Andrei Babushkin, leader of Yabloko's Tatarstan branch, Mitrokhin added that the party has made the platform available in other minority languages as well. (On Yabloko's website, the program, "Russia Needs Change," is already available in 15 languages)

They are the only major political party in Russia to make such a gesture.

Mitrokhin also said that no one in Russia would suffer if the Tatar language became Russia's second state language.

"This was our response to today's Russian marches," Mitrokhin wrote in his blog on Yabloko's website, adding that the sentiments behind the nationalist rallies "carves a demarcation line between the peoples."

Driving home the point, Mitrokhin raised the specter of the Balkan wars of the 1990s. "Twenty years ago, [Slobodan] Milosevic led Yugoslavia down this path," he wrote. "He raised Serbian nationalism to the level of a state ideology and ended up not only with the disintegration of Yugoslavia, but also of Serbia itself."

Today's National Unity Day holiday, which was celebrated in the Russian Empire and was re-established by Vladimir Putin in 2005, marks the popular uprising which expelled Polish-Lithuanian forces from Moscow in November 1612, leading to the end of the Time of Troubles.

The holiday was originally designed to shore up support for the regime. But in Kazan, Mitrokhin said it has turned into little more than a platform for ultra-nationalists.

Yabloko's position stands out in a election season in which most major political parties are playing the nationalist card in one form or another. It also comes at a time when Tatar and other minority languages are coming under threat amid a drive to Russify the educational system in the ethnic republics.

Will it pay electoral dividends? Perhaps. Most analysts expect Yabloko to struggle to clear the seven-percent barrier to win seats in the State Duma in the December 4 parliamentary elections. And while a vocal anti-nationalist stand will most likely not harm the party with its urbane and liberal supporters, it may win them some votes among Tatars and other ethnic minorities.

But that all might be moot given how these elections are expected to go down -- no party is getting into the Duma unless the Kremlin, with its media dominance and vast administrative resources, wants them in.  

Regardless, Mitrokhin's efforts to raise the level of public discourse today was, to say the least, refreshing.

-- Brian Whitmore

Tags: yabloko , nationalism , 2011 State Duma elections , Sergei MItrokhin

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Ray F. from: Lawrence, KS
November 04, 2011 20:39
Nice report and good to hear something positive. His advocacy of a multi-ethnic policy is definitely against the grain of the growing nationalist sentiments in Russia. But can his rational argument be heard among the professional media and political provocateurs employed by the Kremlin?

While there is a danger of garnering western support, if I were a Russian, I would certainly cast my vote for Mr. Mitrokhin and the Yabloko platform.
In Response

by: Jack from: US
November 06, 2011 14:56
which is why Russian people will never follow Western demagogery and fake democracy. Democracy is when leaders are elected by the people, not selected by double-faced government mafia disgused as "republicans" and "democrats" as in US. The Yabloko party is not a party at all, as they claim:
"They are the only major political party in Russia to make such a gesture".
To say that Yabloko is "major" political party is quite an overstretch. They are nothing more than a small group of vocal political stooges, financed by the US government. Everyone knows that, which is why Yabloko will never get anywhere - they are more like Bolsheviks under Lenin and Trotsky who were financed by German government (and to a significant extent by some American millionaires).
In Response

by: Russian Slavic from: Russia
November 09, 2011 08:32
As for the apple you're right, this is a puppet of American millionaires. Mitrokhin, we Evrey.A Jews unbelief.

by: Ver Ami
November 06, 2011 02:51

Yes, no doubt the West misses the good old days of Yeltsin, Yabloko, and the multi passport Oligarchs.
The days when Madeline Albright was confident enough to say that Siberia was too rich in resources to belong to just one country. . .
In Response

by: Joe
November 09, 2011 15:37
From the above article, is this excerpt, which is to expected from a stooge of disinformation:

Driving home the point, Mitrokhin raised the specter of the Balkan wars of the 1990s. "Twenty years ago, [Slobodan] Milosevic led Yugoslavia down this path," he wrote. "He raised Serbian nationalism to the level of a state ideology and ended up not only with the disintegration of Yugoslavia, but also of Serbia itself."

In Response

by: eli
November 09, 2011 16:23
Which part of this do you find fault with, Mr. Averko? That the nationalist path would doom Russia? That Milosevic was a nationalist demagogue? That Yugoslavia has been divided? That Serbia has been divided? I would figure that is the one thing a genocide-denier like yourself could actually agree with...
In Response

by: Joe
November 11, 2011 23:33
Sleazy demagogues like yourself misrepresent the past and present by highlighting certain particulars over others, while presenting questionable opinions as facts.

The wars of the last decade in former Yugoslavia involved far more than what the likes of yourself inaccurately spin.

You're of course free to erroneously suggest that some others have done no wrong.

Serbs and Russians have very good reason to be proud of their respective identity/nation. This point isn't intended to negate that there haven't been any negatives pertaining to these two.

Contrast that view with the kind of nationalist anti-Russian and anti-Serb crap that you seem to prefer.

About This Blog

The Power Vertical is a blog written especially for Russia wonks and obsessive Kremlin watchers by Brian Whitmore. It covers emerging and developing trends in Russian politics, shining a spotlight on the high-stakes power struggles, machinations, and clashing interests that shape Kremlin policy today. Check out The Power Vertical Facebook page or

Listen

​​