Saturday, May 26, 2012


Persian Letters

Why Is Ahmadinejad Sulking?

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (left) and President Mahmud Ahmadinejad (file photo)
TEXT SIZE - +
There seem to be increasing tensions between Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Mahmud Ahmadinejad.

The source of the most recent friction is last week’s aborted “resignation” of Iran’s Intelligence Minister Heydar Moslehi, who was reportedly dismissed by Ahmadinejad but quickly reinstated by Khamenei.

In the latest sign of the dispute, presidential media adviser Ali Akbar Javanfekr, who is also the managing editor of IRNA, Iran’s official news agency, was summoned to court.

Heydar Moslehi
And according to unconfirmed reports, Ahmadinejad has not been seen at the presidential palace for four days. He also did not attend a cabinet meeting on Sunday. Moslehi is said to have attended the meeting.  

Some Iranian websites have speculated Ahmadinejad did not attend to show his disapproval with the failed dismissal of Moslehi.

On April 16, Iranian news websites reported that Moslehi had "resigned" and that Ahmadinejad had accepted his resignation and appointed him as an intelligence adviser. Khamenei, who has the last say in the Islamic republic, was reported to have intervened quickly and rejected the "resignation."

The disagreement over Moslehi was in the open as pro-Ahmadinejad and government websites, including IRNA, appeared to ignore Khamenei’s decree and published it a day after it was issued.

Tensions between Khamenei and Ahmadinejad are nothing new. There have been several cases of apparent disagreement in recent months between the Iranian leader and the president, who has been pushing for greater power and authority.

Some observers believe the current dispute is the most serious so far.

Prominent exiled dissident Akbar Ganji believes the intelligence, military, and security branch of the Islamic republic is taking measures against Ahmadinejad and his allies similar to those it has used against the opposition Green Movement. Ganji says the order for the move against the Iranian president comes from Khamenei himself.

"Everyone remembers that [the hard-line daily] 'Kayhan' and other intelligence, military, and security organs have over and over accused [opposition leaders] Mir Hossein Musavi and Mehdi Karrubi and [former President] Mohammad Khatami of being the agents of Mossad, the CIA, and British intelligence services. Now, Ahmadinejad’s turn has come," Ganji writes in an article published on the news website “Gooya.” "He’s being considered a sedition bigger and more dangerous than the Green sedition."

Sedition is a term Iranian leaders use to describe the Green Movement.

In a recent editorial, “Kayhan” attacked Ahmadinejad’s close aide Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, without naming him, accusing him of being a “deviant” and orchestrating last week's events. "Kayhan" is believed to often express the views of Iran’s supreme leader.

Ganji says the disputes between those at the top of the Iranian establishment are an opportunity for “empowering the people." He writes that reformists should remain silent about the current dispute because any kind of comment could lessen the tensions and lead Khamenei to push for a "forced unity."

-- Golnaz Esfandiari
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Banafsheh from: New York
April 26, 2011 15:19
Most democratic-minded and secularist Iranians have not yet forgiven Mr. Akbar Ganji for having been a part of the Iranian regime's own machinery. He may have ended up opposing that regime but he continues to actively refuse to answer for or apologize for the brutality that he himself participated in during the years he worked as a civil servant of the Islamic Republic. He has actively rebuffed and even on occasion acted with abject disdain for those who have called on him to acknowledge his mistakes. He has become now nothing more than window-dressing for an echelon of elitist religious intellectuals who show little tolerance for anyone who does not think like them. He is FAR from being an example for a liberal Iran.

by: Bahman_Azad from: US
April 27, 2011 02:50
Can you give us a list of all "perfect" Iranians so that we can once for all denounce everyone who is not on that list?

I don't care about Ganji or anyone else but what is clear to me is that people like you have nothing but venom running in their veins. You have no interest in improving the lives of the Iranian people. The only thing that the few people like you, who almost all happen be living outside of Iran, can do is HATE, HATE, HATE.

Of hundreds if not thousands of videos of brave protesters from inside Iran, how many have shown support for your hate-ful thinking? Zero...do you get the message? Try a therapist.

by: Ehsan from: Oslo
April 27, 2011 11:40
I very much agree with Bahman Azad. There is a group of perfect Iranians that are even irritated over the fact that some Iranians have been born after the revolution inside Iran ! To them it doesn't matter that Mr. Ganji has paid a heavy price defending freedom, from torture to years of imprisonment. There is nothing liberal or democratic about people of this brand. They represent secular democracy as much as Shah and his cohorts did !

About This Blog

Persian Letters is a blog that offers a window into Iranian politics and society. Written primarily by Golnaz Esfandiari, Persian Letters brings you under-reported stories, insight and analysis, as well as guest Iranian bloggers -- from clerics, anarchists, feminists, Basij members, to bus drivers.

Guerrilla Translators

Seen anything in the Iranian blogosphere that you think Persian Letters should cover? If so, contact Golnaz Esfandiari at esfandiarig@rferl.org