Saturday, May 26, 2012


Features

Amnesty International Warns World 'At Historic Crossroads'

TEXT SIZE - +
WATCH: Amnesty's Middle East & North Africa Program Director Malcolm Smart says the recent Arab uprisings have been sending the message that people will no longer tolerate repression. (Video courtesy of Amnesty International)

By Daisy Sindelar

Imagine a world that is "flat" -- that is, a world where every person has access to information and can participate in decisions affecting their lives with no fear of persecution.

In its latest annual report, released on May 13, rights watchdog Amnesty International says the past year offered a hopeful glimpse of just such a world -- but that many governments are more determined than ever to fight dissent.

Angry street protests in Tunisia in January led to the overthrow of the country's leadership and sparked a wave of demonstrations still reverberating throughout the Middle East and North Africa. 

The Tunisian revolution got its start with the self-immolation of an impoverished street vendor, Mohamed Bouazizi, in December 2010. Amnesty International says Tunisia capped off a year when repressive governments first "faced the real possibility that their days were numbered."

But it was not only the start of protests against corruption and economic disparity that distinguished 2010 from other years.

WATCH: Europe & Central Asia Program Director Nicola Duckworth says Azerbaijan, Belarus, Russia, and parts of Central Asia are seeing a continuing trend of repression and rights violations:



Salil Shetty, secretary-general of Amnesty International, says it was also a year that saw information revealed and shared more openly than ever before.

"The coming together of people, standing up against oppression, is what we are all about," Shetty says. "And we are truly inspired by what's happened, and we are going to really focus our energies on strengthening and growing the movement, the human rights movement, across the world in this important year."

Moment Of Opportunity

Amnesty says the mounting demands for reform across the Middle East, combined with unparalleled access to information and community organizing, have laid the ground for an era of unprecedented change across much of the world.

But it also warns that this moment of opportunity is at risk of being rolled back by repressive and corrupt governments eager to prevent similar revolutions on their own turf.

WATCH: Asia-Pacific Program Director Sam Zarifi says 2010 was the worst year for civilians in Afghanistan since the beginning of the conflict there, and that women have suffered in particular:



Political repression deepened in Iran, while security concerns continued to dominate life in Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Across the Balkans and the former Soviet Union, human rights violations remain a day-to-day standard, with governments systematically repressing free speech, freedom of assembly, and the rights of women, activists, refugees, and minorities.

In its new 400-page report, which comes out just ahead of Amnesty's 50th anniversary on May 28, the group says dozens of countries continue to muzzle, imprison, and torture human rights defenders. And across the globe, governments are attempting to seize control of access to information, blocking Internet access and cutting mobile-phone networks.

John Dalhuisen, Amnesty's deputy director of its Europe and Central Asia program, says the world stands on a "knife's edge" between unprecedented freedoms and a wave of harsh repressions.

He says that while many people may be tempted to see the Arab protests as a sign of imminent change in other parts of the world, regions like Central Asia remain as tightly controlled as ever, and are likely to see still-harsher repressions as their leaders look nervously to the collapsing regimes in the Middle East and North Africa.

"Translating this to the former Soviet Union, to Central Asia, it's very important not to make false parallels and false connections," Dalhuisen says. "We've seen in Central Asia, really, a period of stagnation rather than flux and change over the last year. And really, while we are seeing dawns elsewhere in the world, we're really not seeing that in Central Asia. And really there's a big push that still needs to be made to see the respect for human rights and the empowerment of peoples really take off in that part of the world."
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Kontantin from: Los angeles
May 13, 2011 06:20
If blaim it on information (by the way Russia-USA telepats-spies
Rad it from my mind and posts for last few days) - how would I say:
"Don't blaim it on information", if it wouldn't be freedom of information?
Societies had be ready for democratic reforms, at least for a generation.

The problem is - ordinarily bad hings are magnified in moderm info-times
Andf some evil or oportunistic forces, sometimes small fraction of percent
In a country, often manipulated by small groups of the hangry for loot ones,
Create illusion of a "Revolution" where there is no demend for it, just ment.

by: Amnesty International from: London
May 13, 2011 10:34
It's been a really bad year for dictators, lets make next year even worse!

http://tinyurl.com/annualreport11

In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
May 13, 2011 16:10
"Molodetc" - "Amnesty international" by Her Magesty for Rashka!
Did you promiss Her be Emperor of the Universe, In "Galafre"?
Are you the "Doctor Who" with mean "Varyazhskaya ryashka"?
Is "tiny url" a "mal zolotnik no dorog", as said Hrutchev's Fe?

Is it, "molodetc", 9/11 report you urging make "even worse"?
If dictators are Peter the I Bagrationi-Men'shikov and Stalin,
If liberators are Katrin the Prashka and genocidal "Varyagi",
If rolled in "worse" insurgency - Babilon-Nasrala-Russians,
Is emerging "platcdarms for herpies" new Empires course?

by: ingrid from: brisbane
May 14, 2011 04:17
I think the writing is on the wall "Me'ne, Men'e, Te'kel"
Daniel phropysied: Whereas you beheld iron mixed with moist clay, they will come to be mixed with the offspring of mankind; but they will not prove to be sticking together, this one to that one, just as iron is not mixing with molded clay.
True in this time, the iron like rulership of the governments, is proving to be not mixing with the clay of mankind.
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
May 18, 2011 03:38
Ingrid, sorry foir going ahead of you too fast.
It was in Median (South-East Georgian) language,
Misspronounced by Babilonian, than Hibru and at last
By Assirian alphabet change and Pharissees smart angle.

"Me Ani Me Ani Te Ku Ali" means in pre-Georgian routs of words:
"What of this People, Civilization, High - Flames from larger World".
I can accept that clay-humanities are parishable under fire and rain,
Pure indure, better-off get greedy, envious empires insurge in venom,
Often using proxy revolutionaries or breeders - Hisballa the Chaldeans.
In Response

by: Despan from: Armenia
May 27, 2011 11:08
What's this median language? Pre-Georgian? You are out of your mind.
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
May 27, 2011 15:23
Look: WotldFreedomAndTruth.info (pictures) reference to map's.
Read history books. It is typical for Russian-Urartu propaganda,
Since Hrutchev destroyed textbooks, replace Erevanian Iberia
That was part of South-Iberian pre-Georgia and UN of Media,
That was part of South-East Albanian-Iberian pre-Georgia,
With the "Great Urartu Chaldeo-Persian" Imperial spaces.
In Response

by: ingrid from: Brisbane
May 28, 2011 00:36
On the basis of the languages used in Daniel some unfounded criticisms of the book have been made, but there is strong argument supporting the statements in the book of Daniel as to the time of its wrirting. Ref: The International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia, Vol ll, p. 785, says: " We claim, however, that the composite Aramaic of Daniel agrees in almost every particular of orthography, etymology and syntax, with the Aramaic of the North Semitic inscriptions of the 9th, 8th, and 7th centuries BC and of the Egyptian papyri of the 5th century BC, and that the vocabulary of Daniel has an admixture of Hebrew, Babylonian and Persian words, similar to that of the papyri of the 5th century BC; whereas, it differs in composition from the Aramaic of the Nabateans, which is devoid of Persian, Hebrew, and Babylonian words, and is full of Arabisms, and also from that of the Palmyrenes, which is full of Greek words, while having but one or two Persian words, and no Hebrew or Babylonian."
There are some so-called Persian words in Daniel, but in view of the frequent dealings that the Jews had with Babylonians, Medes, Persians and others, this is not unusual. Furthermore, most of the foreign names used by Daniel are names of officials, articles of clothing, legal terms and such, for which the Hebrew or Aramaic of the time apparently had no equally suitable terms. Daniel was writing for his people who were for the most part in Babylonia, and many were scattered in other places at this time. Therefore, he wrote in language that would be understandable to them.
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
May 28, 2011 16:20
First of all all those languages, you mentioned, Ingrid,
Came from pre-Georgian, look: WorldFreedomAndTruth.info
And consider that the writing on the wall was about Media dead,
In unknown to Babilonians and Jews language - he translated too.

It cannot be anything but Median - one of the pre-Georgian dialects
That produced also Persian language. As Media was the liberator,
It couldn't be other language - Persia invaded Median CIS later.
Also it is easy - pre-Georgian letters-words translation direct:

"Me" made it discriptive, "Ani" made it related to human or city,
"Te" made it high, "Ku" made it space, territory or country, "Ali"
Made it flames, "Pe" made it down, "Aris" made it is, or done.
"Mene, Mene, Tekel, Paris" meant: MeAniMeAniTeKuePeAris.

Even old Hibru, after Assirians - still have some genuin pray
Translated-corrected from pre-Georgian: "Boruh Ato Adonay"
- "Ba O Ra U He Ai Te O Ai Diah O Ani Aris Ai" ...


by: Ingrid from: Brisbane
May 30, 2011 13:06
Daniel chapter 5: verse 18-31 verse 26-27-28-30-31, " this is the interpretation of the word: ME'NE, God has numbered {the days of } your kingdom and has finished it.
"TE'KEL, you have been weighed in the balances and have been found deficient.
"PE'RES, your kingdom has been divided and given to the Medes and the Persians.
In that very night Belshaz'zar the Chal-de'an king was killed and Da-ri'us the Mede himself received the kingdom, being about sixty - two years old.
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
May 31, 2011 06:46
Daniel was just interpreting, bitter with King's betray, thought part of it
was also a translation.
1.
Me'ne - (ME ANI) = of humans and their cities.
He said that God will finish in numbered days, for betraing Daniel and his people:
"YOUR KINGDOM = YOUR PEOPLE AND THEIR CITIES"
2.
Te'kel - (TE KU E ALI) = high in space or territory stady flame or spirit.
He said that King that betrayed him "TE KU E" ~ = weighed in the ballance
(Daniel was too at liberty in your version condam the King-treator, it also
could be translated ~ = "The High in his country, sure of himself").
He also said that King was found deficient (in your version), instead of "in flame or spirit", thought it might be also taken as streched interpretation.
3.
Pe'res - (Pe Ra E Sa) = down go steady or quietly united (by).
Daniel (in your version) said that Kings Kingdom be devided between Medes and Persians (instead of "Kingdom be falling down and incorporated" by UN forces of Median CIS").
What for you brought Persians and Darius there?
Helping Russia to incourage Iran to dreem of new Darius Empire?
It happened during Median (South Eastern pre-Georgia) United Nations,
But at later time, after Mediand moved to new Capital Medes, before
Persians Hords, multiplying under benevolance of Median UN and
Being missguided by Babilonian-Susianna part-Neanderthals betrayed
and invaded Media.


by: ingrid from: Brisbane
June 01, 2011 09:14
The historical truthfulness and accuracy of the Bible does not rest upon the imperfect, uninspired documents. Daniel wrote according to the historical facts and under the inspiration of God's holy spirit. Matthew 24:15.
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 02, 2011 01:15
Do not twist it, Ingrid, in greed, it is a sin to use God for your deed.
It is the truth of history that Daniel wrote, but not in your interpretation!
As in most of other places in the Bible, it's first moral exemplification,
Here betrail of King, that lived in wilderness for 7 years and prayed.

Daniel didn't say that he translate it word to word, he was asked
What the writig meant and he answered that it meant denial him
And his people freedom after King prayed, promissing it to God -
Bringing a destruction to Babilon and its Capital, and to the King.

What are you trying to twist in? Monopoly on Bible translation?
Monopoly of Darius, Russian, German and British Epmpires
To missinterpret Bible and history - for Imperial restoration?
Some words Daniel used - reasons for warning of "writing"!

In Response

by: Ingrid from: Brisbane
June 03, 2011 05:08
Babylon did not appreciate that God could read her heart and see how she prided herself on being the supreme one, the most mighty power on the earth, the Mistress of Kingdoms. Isa chapter 47: v 10, She said: "i am, and there is nobody else." Proud, self-confident Babylon did not take into account the thoughts of God that he had already expressed through his prophets. Chapter Isa 47: v 8-9 And now hear this, you pleasure-given {woman}, the one sitting in security, the one saying in her heart: "I am , and there is nobody else. I shall not sit as a widow, and I shall not know the loss of children." 9 But to you these two things will come suddenly, in one day: loss of children and widowhood. In their complete measure they must come upon you, for the abundance of your sorceries, for the full might of your spells exceedingly. Verse 10, And you kept trusting in your badness. You have said: "There is no one seeing me. Your wisdom and your knowledge- this is what has led you away; and you keep saying in your heart: "i am, and there is nobody else. Verse 11, And upon you calamity must come; you will know no charming against it. And upon you adversity will fall; you will not be able to avert it. And upon you there will suddenly come a ruin that you are not accustomed to know.

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 03, 2011 19:51
Your devotion to passages from Bible is very good.
However, giving the typical ilogical women's logic,
Added to O'Henry's "ilogical American" boasting,
Logical reason is not the same that love to God.
In Response

by: ingrid from: Brisbane
June 08, 2011 01:55
Regarding bible truth, it is always better to speak with spiritual vision that is not blurred, which in turn provides a safe guide for mankind Math chapter 15: verse 14; Let them be. Blind guides is what they are. If, then, a blind man guides a blind man, both will fall into a pit.
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 08, 2011 18:43
God works in miraculous ways , indeed, bringing you to such "vision",
Thought, Law of God, starting with The 10, have higher precident,
Because one can "invision" anything, sometimes an "illusion",
In this particular vision it worked for you like little book of pray.

Not too blessed, or educated one, should not lead or to pritch,
In your case a woman - often be taken by emotion or a vision,
Have correlate vision with the Law of God, or find a good prist.
Even in just made kofee, one might see leading to pit illusion.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Loophole Offers Legal Out For Doctor Convicted In Bin Laden Case

Latest Comment (9 total)

F*ALL: No the US can go to hell. This was blood money earned by ... More

Afghan Parliament OKs Security Pact

Latest Comment (1 total)

donky kong: No surprise. Both candidates support this too. Choosing between Obama or Romney is ... More

No Saturday Night Fever, As Armenia Mulls Eurovision Blackout

Latest Comment (24 total)

Rafi: There's no need to bring in a straw man, and make me say ... More