Thursday, July 24, 2014


Caucasus Report

Armenia Gears Up For De-Ideologized Election

Supporters of the Prosperous Armenia party attend an election campaign rally in Yerevan on May 3.
Supporters of the Prosperous Armenia party attend an election campaign rally in Yerevan on May 3.
It has become progressively clearer during the four-week campaign preceding the Armenian parliamentary elections on May 6 that the main campaign issue is not the political, economic, or foreign-policy choices the country faces, but the actual conduct of the election itself.

Instead of focusing primarily on their party programs, candidates from the seven parties and one bloc competing with President Serzh Sarkisian's Republican Party of Armenia (HHK) have accused both the HHK and its coalition partner, Prosperous Armenia (BH) of seeking to influence the outcome by either the use of "administrative resources" or the distribution of financial and material incentives.  

Much media coverage of the campaign too has focused on whether and how the HHK and BH can and will use the considerable resources at their disposal to illegally augment their share of the vote.  Meanwhile, election campaign posters on the streets of Yerevan are few and far between.

In campaign speeches across the country, President Sarkisian has repeatedly pledged to ensure the vote is the most democratic in Armenia's recent history, in order to facilitate the formation of a government that would enjoy popular trust

Responding to allegations that thousands of additional names have been added to electoral rolls to enable the ruling party to inflate the number of ballots cast for it, HHK spokesman Eduard Sharmazanov similarly assured RFE/RL's Armenian Service that "the authorities will exclude any undemocratic and illegal manifestation during the elections.... We will do everything to make these elections normal and democratic."  

The police department responsible for maintaining voter lists claims to have reviewed and checked the voter lists to remove the names of some 2,000 persons deceased or no longer resident in Armenia. It later gave the total number of registered voters as 2,482,238.

But former Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian, who is second on the BH list of candidates competing for the 90 parliament mandates distributed under the proportional system, has called into question the accuracy of the revised lists. He said last week BH had already detected "tens of thousands of inaccuracies" in the electoral rolls, including bogus voters with the same date of birth simultaneously registered at multiple electoral districts under slightly altered names.

Levon Zurabian, a prominent member of former President Levon Ter-Petrossian's Armenian National Congress (HAK), pointed to an "abnormally" large number of households with 10 or more registered voters. He said HAK campaigners had also detected voters listed as residents of nonexistent or abandoned apartments buildings in Yerevan.

In a bid to verify that the number of votes actually cast corresponds to the officially proclaimed turnout figure, BH, together with the HAK and the Armenian Revolutionary Federation-Dashnaktsutiun (HHD), has formally asked the Constitutional Court to annul the legal prohibition on publishing after the election the names of those persons who actually voted. The three parties joined forces last month to create an Inter-Party Center for Public Oversight of the Elections that intends to fight electoral fraud. The court is to consider their request on May 5.

Claims Of Vote-Buying

A second focus of opposition parties' shared apprehension is the anticipated recourse by the ruling party to vote-buying, primarily by wealthy businessmen running on the HHK ticket. (Ter-Petrossian indicated last week that the going rate is 5,000 drams, or $12.76). President Sarkisian has issued explicit instructions to prosecutors to combat vote-buying, which he described as "a negative phenomenon that casts a shadow on the legitimacy of any election."

HHK spokesman Sharmazanov has categorically denied that his party seeks to "buy" votes in exchange for cash sums or the provision of services. At the same time, Sharmazanov defended the right of individual party members who head charitable foundations to engage in charitable activities, providing they do not violate the law.

The fine line between benevolent activity and soliciting votes for material gain is on occasion a subjective one, however. It can and frequently is deliberately blurred by election participants seeking to discredit rival political parties.  Spokesmen for BH Chairman Gagik Tsarukian, one of Armenia's wealthiest businessmen, have repeatedly denied media allegations in recent weeks that the distribution of dozens of tractors in rural districts by a company Tsarukian owns constitutes attempted vote-buying.

Armenia's human rights ombudsman, Karen Andreassian, predicted in early April that the actual voting on May 6 would not be marred by large-scale fraud. He did not, however, exclude the possibility of unspecified "pressure" on voters on polling day.

The assessments of the previous three Armenian parliamentary elections (in 1999, 2003, and 2007) by the OSCE's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights all differentiate between the relatively unproblematic and fair process of voting and far more serious violations during the vote count and tabulation. BH, as a member of the three-party body set up to combat fraud, plans to install video cameras in all of Armenia's 2,000 polling stations on election day to record both the voting and the vote count. "We consider this a very important oversight mechanism," Naira Zohrabian, who represents BH in the outgoing parliament and is running for reelection, told RFE/RL's Armenian Service.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Robert from: Yerevan, AR
May 08, 2012 08:37
Many democratic Armenians actually prefer to return Karabakh to Azerbaijan and settle the conflict. It doesnt matter who's in charge in Yerevan, the corrupt Karabakh-clan uses the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict to create hatred against Azerbaijan. This allows the Karabakh-clan to remain in power. Ter-Petrosiyan predicted in 1999 that keeping Karabakh would doom Armenia. Well its true now. The majority of our borders are closed and the Georgian-Russian borders are closed aswell. Armenian trade and economy is a joke. The country is sustained by remittances from Russia, US and France. This is not how a modern state operates, its utterly embarrassing for us! The solution is cooperation with neighbours and integration in the new upcoming Silk-Road project. Armenian people were already excluded many other regional projects that brought benefit to Georgia and Azerbaijan. The Silk Road is our last chance to integrate and fix our country. To get access to the Silk Road we need to fix the Artsakh conflict with Azerbaijan. If we must let go of Artsakh to save Armenia then be so. Blind nationalism will be our undoing. I think its more important to look at the bigger picture. I say forget Artsakh and focus on OUR country. Lets take Yerevan back in our own hands! And lets destroy corruption and monopolies and promote democracy, freedom and cooperation!
In Response

by: Levon from: Yerevan
May 11, 2012 05:54
Robert, you are obviously an Azeri government worker. No democratic Armenian and no Armenian in general prefers to "return" Karabakh to Azerbajian. First and foremost, Artsakh has never been a part of an country called Azerbajian. It was only put under the Azerbaijani SSR during the Soviet Union by Stalin and Artsakh ceded legally from the USSR at the same time Azerbaijan did. Secondly, the people of Armenia are not the ones to decide Artsakh's fate. That is the responsibility and right of the people of Artsakh. If they decide to remain an independent country, as they've been since the Soviet Union collapsed or if they decide to join the Republic of Armenia, it will solely be the decision of the people of Artsakh and no one else's. Thirdly, the liberation of Artsakh from Turkish/Azeri occupiers is but the first step in the liberation of the remaining Armenian lands still under Tatar/Mongol occupation. Nakhichevan will be next, along with the entirety of Western Armenia. The worldwide Armenian Diaspora is worth a million times more than the the limited and depleting oil of the so-called state of azerbaijan. When all is said and done, we will take back the rest of our lands and "Azerbajian" will be re-united with Souther Azarbajian, under the rightful control of Iran.
In Response

by: Phil from: UK
May 11, 2012 10:17
You heard it straight from the horse's mouth! Armenian aggressive expansionist mindset, in lieu of UN resolutions, false histories and racist agenda, and of course support for the terrorist state of Iran!

The New Armenian mindset in a nutshell! Propogated by those who do not know war.. not yet anwyay.

However, this bankrupt state will not be around for too much longer, once the West puts the final screws on Iran, Armenia will be in a total blockade, only way to inject resources will be to fly them in, I'm sure Russia will do that for a while... but not forever.. and then the axe will fall.

About This Blog

This blog presents analyst Liz Fuller's personal take on events in the region, following on from her work in the "RFE/RL Caucasus Report." It also aims, to borrow a metaphor from Tom de Waal, to act as a smoke detector, focusing attention on potential conflict situations and crises throughout the region. The views are the author's own and do not represent those of RFE/RL.