Thursday, February 16, 2012


News

Banja Luka Takes Autonomy Battle To U.S., As Russia Comes To Sarajevo

Republika Srpska Prime Minister Milorad Dodik wants to end international supervision of Bosnia
TEXT SIZE - +
By Heather Maher

WASHINGTON -- The government of Bosnia's Serb entity, the Republika Srpska, has launched a two-pronged diplomatic offensive aimed at sending an unmistakable message to the international community: stay out of Bosnia's internal affairs.
 

Banja Luka sent envoys this week to Washington to deliver that message to officials in Congress. And on November 5, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made a one-day visit to Bosnia-Herzegovina to voice support for the Republika Srpska's drive to eliminate the Office of the High Representative, the international oversight post tasked with supervising the 1995 Dayton peace agreement that ended the Bosnian war.


Speaking at a news conference after meeting with Bosnia's Foreign Minister Sven Alkalaj, Lavrov said the time has come to let Bosnians run their own country without outside interference.


"The election of Bosnia to the [UN] Security Council [in October] makes especially relevant the issue of Bosnians taking the fate of their country in their own hands, so they can finally rid themselves of outside supervision," Lavrov said.

"And in this regard, Russia, as an active member of the Peace Implementation Council, supports the rapid transformation of the Office of the High Representative to the office or the mission of a special representative of the EU," he added.


Unmet Benchmarks

The era of international control over Bosnia-Herzegovina began in 1995, at the end of the three-year Bosnian war, with the establishment of the Office of the High Representative (OHR).


The OHR was charged with overseeing implementation of Dayton until the country was deemed stable, democratic, and politically capable of assuming control of its own affairs. The current high representative is Valentin Inzko, an Austrian diplomat.


In February 2007, the 55-member Peace Implementation Council, which oversees the work of the OHR, decided that Bosnia had progressed enough to allow the OHR to end its work within 18 months.


But one year later, a review of Bosnia's progress led to another decision: to extend the OHR's mandate until additional reform benchmarks and conditions were met.


That has proved an elusive goal for the fragile multiethnic state. With the country divided into two sparring entities -- the Republika Srpska and the Muslim-Croat Federation -- and run by an awkward postwar tripartite governing structure, accord in key areas like state property rights and constitutional reform has been all but impossible.


The Muslim-Croat Federation is aligned with the desire of the EU and United States to keep the OHR open and centralize the country's institutions. But Bosnian Serbs, who are seen as more loyal to neighboring Serbia than their own central government in Sarajevo, want more autonomy and have rejected the push for further consolidation.

Milorad Dodik, the prime minister of Republika Srpska, has repeatedly called for the OHR's closure, and has threatened to hold a referendum on seceding from Bosnia.


On November 5, Dodik got a show of support from a powerful ally in the form of Lavrov's visit. The Russian foreign minister said closing the OHR is "long overdue:"


"It is only logical to terminate as soon as possible the mandate of the high representative and the so-called 'Bonn authority,' which have already become an obstacle to the strengthening of Bosnian statehood," he said.


Lavrov's comments were all the more significant coming from Sarajevo, rather than Banja Luka, the Republika Srpska capital.


Washington PR Push

The OHR's fate is due to be discussed on November 18 in Sarajevo at a meeting of the Peace Implementation Council, of which the United States and Russia are both members.

Meanwhile, in Washington, a delegation of Republika Srpska officials is making the rounds on Capitol Hill to press the case that Bosnia is capable of self-government.


It will be an uphill battle. The feeling in Washington among many in Congress and at influential policy groups and NGOs is quite the opposite: that unless the United States recommits to helping steer Bosnia's development toward EU and NATO integration, the country will continue to slide backwards into nationalistic divisions and potentially, another conflict.


One member of the Bosnian Serb delegation, Gordan Milosevic, who is Dodik's foreign-policy adviser, told RFE/RL that that view is "false."


"We are hostages of a fraud, basically, in terms of how the international public is persuaded about what the real situation in Bosnia is. It's a false impression that you're getting here," he said.


Milosevic -- no relation to former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic -- says he and his fellow Bosnian Serbs came to Washington to reassure the Americans that Bosnia is doing just fine, and to tell them that no further help is needed.


As for the Office of the High Representative, Milosevic says the post is "the biggest thing preventing Bosnia and Herzegovina applying for [EU] candidate status."


"There is no reason for OHR to be there. Bosnia-Herzegovina is out of the Dayton phase. It's approaching the Brussels phase. And it needs a special representative of the European Union," he said.

Milosevic added that Bosnia "doesn't need an international protector who imposes laws, replaces elected officials, and such things, and even imposes amendments to the constitution. That is unacceptable. That era in Bosnia is over. It will not come back. And Mr. Inzko and his staff, they need to be aware of that fact. Unfortunately, some of them are not. And they are presenting the situation as such in order to have a justification for staying there [longer]." 
 

He also said that what the EU and United States want for Bosnia -- to move toward membership in the EU and NATO -- is also what the Republika Srpska wants.


U.S. Misrepresented

The Republika Srpska delegation's message wasn't well received by at least one group it met with in Washington: the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the U.S. Helsinki Commission.
 

A few hours after the meeting, the chairman of the commission, Senator Benjamin Cardin (Democrat, Maryland) issued a statement that said his position in the meeting with the Bosnian Serbs had been "inaccurately summarized" on the website of the Banja Luka government.
 

Cardin set the record straight: "Constitutional reform is essential to creating a functional Bosnian state, and Bosnia's domestic political leaders need to find agreement on what this reform entails. This is the essence of what I said to the visiting delegation, with the additional expression of hope that the United States remains actively engaged in the effort."
 

He added, "If, and only if, the government of Republika Srpska shares this view that constitutional reform is key to Bosnia's progress, can they claim I support its position."

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 3
    Next 
by: Sergey
November 06, 2009 00:52
I am sure that Christian Orthodox Serbs and Catholic Croats will not accept living under Muslim Rule in Muslim run Bosnia. Judging by numerous examples to what happens when non-Muslims live under Muslim rule (genocide of Armenians and other Christians in 1915-1922 in Ottoman Empire, extermination of southern Sudanese Christians in Sudan since early 1980's are just a few most notorious examples), it is perfectly reasonable to expect Bosnia to be disintegrated into Muslim, Catholic Croat and Orthodox Serb entities. The powers to be who want to keep Bosnia united, but who were happy to see old Yugoslavia torn apart may only slow the process, but they will not stop it.

by: trollbuster from: chicago
November 06, 2009 11:33
the basis of this above article is convoluted.

the bosnian serbs stress the federalized nature of the signed dayton agreement, unlike the bosnian muslim nationalists, who seek a centralized bosnia where they dominate.


by: Alain from: Paris
November 06, 2009 12:44
Machiavel. That's all there is to it. Divide and conquer has been America's theme in the Balkans all along. It was the underlying foundation of the British Empire, and indeed most any empire.
But empires come and go. The American Empire's presence in the Balkans will fade with time... That will probably be sooner rather than later.

by: alex from: london
November 06, 2009 14:25
the solution is indeed very simple, all Serbs go home to Serbia and all the Croats go home to Croatia

by: Abdul Majid
November 06, 2009 17:58
Exactly Alex!

by: Hans from: Groningen, Netherlands
November 06, 2009 18:11
Who are we kidding here? It’s impossible to forcibly glue together people that have no desire to live together. It’s a common knowledge that BH is a creation of Ottomans, it used to be an arbitrary Ottoman province, it has never been a country, it never will. The best solution is to split the artificial country along current internal autonomous borders. Moslem-Croat federation would be absorbed into Croatia and be further broken down into small Croatian counties or županijas with limited local self-administration. Similarly, Republika Srpska should be absorbed into Serbia and be divided into small Serbian districts. This is the only recipe for peace, or you can forever try to pour endless money and energy into a black hole that will never change. BH is a sad joke, it’s always been. Respect peoples’ right to self-determination, i.e. desires, or risk endless wars. This right is embedded in UN Charter, isn’t it?

by: serb from: serbia
November 06, 2009 22:12
The time has come to stop blaming Serbs for anything and everything in the Balkans. Serbs will no longer tolerate constant American rants and provocations against their basic rights. If other nations (i.e. Bosnian Muslims and Kosovo Albanians) feel the need to hide behind "American skirts" every time they sit down to talk with Serbs it will be very, very hard to find the compromise. And since Serbs do not believe America, things might get even more difficult.

by: steve from: texas
November 06, 2009 22:33
@Alex and Abdul Majid, you forgot"and all the Turks go to Turkey or whatever muslim country they fancy

by: Neb from: Toronto
November 06, 2009 23:51
BiH should be divided into three mini states and should be supervised for a few more years as a loose state union. Borders should be open and free of travel and each state should still have 3 constitutive People and full democratic system with a kind of sovereignty for each, Bosnian Mark should be dropped and Euro should be in place,Similar to BENELUX.
BiH reminds me of former Yugoslavia and had all the 6 sides agreed to something like this war would have been avoided. and i don't think forcing everyone to live in one country is the best solution's because there will never be agreements.

by: Abdul Majid
November 07, 2009 01:27
Yes, so that Bosniaks never form more than 30% in these smaller Districts and can always be outvoted and be second-class citizens, right? Wonderful idea Hans. Now, how will you try to convince them of it? That if they don't accept it they will be exterminated? Tell us, how would you convince the Bosniaks to sign away their country, their freedom and their identity?
Comments page of 3
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

UN To Iraq: Start Camp Ashraf Move

Latest Comment (1 total)

Abu Hussain : Mr. Ban ki mon and Mr. Martin Kobler should be aware that the ... More

Jolie In Sarajevo For Film Screening

Latest Comment (9 total)

vn: To: Janja

Would you please do yourself and the world around you a favor ... More

Israel Alleges Network Of Bomb Plotters

Latest Comment (3 total)

Norma Lee: Israel, thou does protest too much. Iranians hired by Mossad to be masquerade ... More