Saturday, May 26, 2012


Features

Russia's Bashkortostan Strains Against Moscow's Centralization Policy

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev visits an exhibition called "Interethnic agreement in the Republic of Bashkortostan" in Ufa in February. But does Moscow see "agreement" as a one-way discourse?
TEXT SIZE - +
By Robert Coalson
In the wake of a bombing in Moscow's Domodedovo Airport that left 40 dead last month, and following a spate of attacks by Russian nationalists on Caucasians and immigrants from Central Asia, President Dmitry Medvedev convened a State Council session in Bashkortostan's capital, Ufa, to discuss multiculturalism.

Medvedev said the meeting was "devoted to the discussion of measures to strengthen multinational accord in our country. The reasons and motivation for this topic, to the consideration of this matter, I think, are well understood by everyone. This is simply a sign that not everything is working properly."

Three days before Medvedev's February 11 appearance in the city, Russian security forces arrested four alleged Islamist extremists in Bashkortostan and charged them with possession of extremist literature and bomb-making materials.

Despite the continuing violence across Russia's North Caucasus and evidence that it could be spreading to the rest of the country, Medvedev was sanguine about Moscow's policies and warned participants at the gathering not to be overly emotional.

"We understand that in our country, like in no other -- and I emphasize, like in no other -- there has been unique experience in the coexistence and development of various ethnicities and cultures," Medvedev said, "which mutually enriched one another and helped one another in the most difficult, most dramatic periods of their development, including during the war [World War II]."

At the same meeting, however, Medvedev stressed the importance of everyone in Russia speaking Russian and of fostering a unitary culture to unite the country.

Bashkir Hunger Strikers

The inconsistency in Medvedev's rhetoric -- and between his rhetoric and actions -- reflects a deep-seated contradiction in Moscow's policy toward ethnic minorities. Russia's official status as a multicultural federation has been undermined by a decade of centralizing policies carried out by Medvedev and his predecessor, current Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.

Bashkir activists protest in front of the FSB bulding in Ufa on February 18.
And while attention has been focused on the violent ethnic strife in the North Caucasus region, Bashkortostan has also been simmering.

Activists from the Bashkir Youth Union (BYI) launched a hunger strike on March 3 to protest alleged "police pressure" on Bashkir nationalists and to demand the release of arrested former BYI leader Artur Idelbayev and Bashkir activist Ayrat Dilmukhametov, who face fraud and extremism charges.

Within a week, about 150 other hunger strikers had joined the protest. Organizers temporarily halted the strike on March 13, following the direct intervention of Bashkortostan's President Rustam Khamitov.

On March 23, however, the activists announced their demands had still not been met and that they planned to resume their hunger strike in April, following a series of demonstrations aimed at attracting support. Acting BYI head Florid Bagayev told RFE/RL the first demonstration would come on March 25.

Bagayev said that at the March 25 rally in Ufa, "we are going to demand the government and security services stay away from ethnic and Muslim leaders. The persecution against them is ongoing."

Bagayev alleged that Bashkir schools and newspapers had been visited by the security forces, who accused them of accessing extremist websites.

No Independent Institutions

The BYI claims it is defending Bashkir language and culture, arguing that Bashkir educational establishments have been restricted and Bashkir-language broadcasts on state media in the republic have been slashed virtually to nothing.

Ex-President Murtaza Rakhimov did Bashkir nationalists few favors in the end.
However, the group, and the semi-official Bashkir Congress, are tied to Bashkortostan's former President Murtaza Rakhimov, the corrupt and authoritarian head of the republic from 1993 until he was maneuvered out of office by Moscow in July 2010.

During his years in office, Bashkir nationalists enjoyed strong support. But Rakhimov's crony-based regime did nothing to establish a healthy civil society or accountable government.

As a result, Bashkir activists now must choose between either being co-opted by Kremlin-connected pseudo-NGOs or risk being persecuted under Russia's wide-ranging antiextremism legislation. When Medvedev was in Ufa, he met with representatives of state-sanctioned civil society groups, but did not speak with any representatives of the most ardent Bashkir nationalist circles, such as the BYI.

Mekhti Sharifov, a legal specialist for the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, wrote in a long analysis published this week that Moscow over the last decade has attempted to transform Russia into a unitary state with a strictly vertical power structure. This means there are no "institutional instruments" for regional authorities and local civic groups to participate in local decision making.

The New Russian Empire

Opposition politician Vladimir Ryzhkov agrees with this analysis. "The very ideology that Putin is installing is imperial. It is in itself destructive for the country," Ryzhkov says. "De facto, he is an imperialist and de facto he is building a new Russia on this bureaucratic-police vertical as an empire. He views, for example, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, and Yakutia as provinces of an empire."

In 2004, purportedly as a reaction to the horrific terrorist incident at a school in Beslan, North Ossetia, where hundreds of children were killed, Putin eliminated the direct election of the heads of federation subjects. He instituted a system under which they are appointed by the Kremlin and approved by local legislatures.

As a result, governors and republic heads take their cues from Moscow and often have little legitimacy in the regions they rule. Bashkortostan's new president, Khamitov, is a typical example.

To confuse matters more, it is also unclear to what extent an executive-branch head like Khamitov controls the executive-branch structures in his region. Khamitov's inability to deliver on his agreement with the hunger-striking students and the continued actions of police and local Federal Security Service (FSB) units in the republic seem to indicate his weakness.

Ryzhkov says this is also part of Putin's policy of undermining the country's formal federalist system. He says Putin "is installing there de facto appointed governors. He is de facto removing the power structures from under any influence of local societies. The new law on the police strengthens this vertical even more. That is -- the police are controlled from outside, the FSB is controlled from outside, the tax authorities from the outside, the prosecutor's office, the prisons, and the governor are all controlled from Moscow."

Ryzhkov and analysts like the Academy of Science's Sharifov have real doubts as to whether Russia's Moscow-centered unitary state has room for institutions of local self-expression. As long as activists like the Bashkir students have no credible avenues for airing their grievances, demonstrations, hunger strikes, and even more radical actions will continue.

RFE/RL's Tatar-Bashkir and Russian services contributed to this report
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Jake from: Wisconsin
March 25, 2011 06:02
Thank you for covering this story. English-language coverage of the Middle Volga republics is sadly lacking.

by: Nuriddin from: UK
March 25, 2011 23:43
Russia will be much stronger as a country if it embraces the multiculturalism in true sense of the word not just on the paper and in talking. Putin's central government in Moscow must allow those communities in Russia with different languages, culture and tradition to study in their own native language and practice their culture and tradition. I have served in USSR Army in 80s and I can confidently say that Mr Putin cannot and will not understand the word multiculturalism, because of his background and USSR army patriotic teachings. However, Mr Medvedev is different, he is reformist and much more tolerant to other nationalities, but he is in tied leash. If Russia does not address its multiculturalism honestly and forces on people only Russian language and culture then it will become the most ethnically violent country in the world. Places such as Dagestan, Chechnya, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Kabardino-Baikal etc. have their own language, tradition and culture which go back to thousands of years and absolutely nothing to do with Russian language and culture. Mr Putin’s policy of one language one culture will backfire. Russia has created one mono-ethnic country already, which is called Armenia. The whole country is ethnically cleansed from Azeries’, Turks, Kurds, Tartars, Jews, Tallish, Lezgins etc. during 90s Nagorno-Karabag war. Thanks to Russia, only pure blood Armenian live in that country, just like Nazi Germany in 30s and 40s.
In Response

by: Donovan from: PA
March 26, 2011 13:40
"Russia created Armenia"? Armenia has been around for thousands of years, before there was any hint of Russians. And I didn't know Dagestan had its own language. What language would that be, son?

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (2 total)

Gushing gush: Your Kadirov and his new minister look like Mongols, but blonde Mongols. Are ... More

Protests Haunt Baku Eurovision Final

Latest Comment (1 total)

super-sonic-Arab-rocket: may be these idiots will arrest all of Azerbaijan until Eurovision ends ! ... More

Last 10 Eurovision Finalists Picked

Latest Comment (5 total)

Camel Anaturk: Meine Liebling EuGenio,we heard and read all about that on radio the Voice ... More