Thursday, February 23, 2012


Transmission

Belarus In A Season of Democratic Vagaries

Belarusian President Alyaksandr Lukashenka (right) welcomes German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle to Minsk last month, one of his new EU "best friends."
TEXT SIZE - +
Belarusian state-run television has begun to regularly broadcast messages that the current head of state is a dictator, the national economy is in shambles, the country has had no real elections since time immemorial, and that President Alyaksandr Lukashenka is on the verge of fleeing to his friend Hugo Chavez in Venezuela.

A joke? A showy way to commit mass suicide by the television management?

Neither.

There is a presidential election campaign in full swing in Belarus. Nine opponents of the incumbent president have been given two half-hours of live uncensored airtime on state television and radio respectively to present their programs and speak out against Lukashenka. They may be accused of slandering state institutions or officials and consequently removed from the race but this was a calculated risk that any of them needed to consider for himself in advance.

By virtue of the election law, Lukashenka, who is running for his fourth term, can take advantage of this election privilege as well. But, as in former presidential campaigns, he has chosen to ignore such appearances.

Instead, he appears on state television and radio almost ceaselessly as the president in office and says what he thinks about his adversaries whenever he feels an itch to do so. And he is quite sure that his challengers evidently lack screen appeal, having been allowed just an hour of free television time every five years in the past decade.

"They demanded live television broadcasts. They were given them. But today their campaigners and ideologists openly admit that it would be better for them to avoid being live on television," Lukashenka told his campaigners on November 29 in order to alleviate their fears that the alternative candidates could do any tangible harm to his reelection chances.

"They thought that they would show themselves on the screen as big orators, that they would say a few words and send people running to vote for them. It turns out that this is not so simple."

Playing To Brussels


Lukashenka is in his worst row with the Kremlin in his entire presidential career. To outweigh a massive defamation campaign from Moscow, he urgently needs to mend fences with Brussels.

Early this month Brussels sent two messengers to Minsk, Poland's Radek Sikorski and Germany's Guido Westerwelle, who imparted some good news to Lukashenka. If he holds an election that Brussels can accept as democratic, the European Union will disburse 3 billion euros ($3.9 billion) from its coffers to support his regime.

For the time being, Lukashenka seems to be behaving in line with Brussels' expectations. The Central Election Commission registered nine challengers to Lukashenka without any problems, even though some commentators raised objections as to whether all of them actually collected the 100,000 signatures required for registration.

And now Lukashenka tolerantly suffers what his contenders say about him and his rule on state television and radio. Just a few examples:

Vital Rymasheuski: "Our authorities respect only one position -- that of power. We intended to elect a president but we elected a tsar who cares only for his sons and for how to stuff the pockets of his clerks with money."

Mikalay Statkevich: "As soon as they start counting votes, they will order the observers to move 10 meters away and stay there, or otherwise the police will take care of them. Pardon my saying, but the observers can watch only their own butts. And afterward, they will announce their results."

Andrey Sannikau: "Just imagine: It's December 20, we have won. The dictatorship is a thing of the past. And Lukashenka has fled to Venezuela on his personal plane. Millions of people are on the streets. They shout 'Hooray! Long live Belarus!' And all of this is live on Belarusian television. We have waited for this victory for 16 years. And this day has come at last!"

Yaraslau Ramanchuk: "I brought two potatoes with me to the studio. One potato is from Belarus, the other from Morocco in Africa. The most interesting fact is that the foreign potato is half the price of ours. In quality they are similar but their price is different. This shows the efficiency with which we use our land and how our agricultural sector works."

Uladzimer Nyaklyayeu, who is believed to be the strongest challenger of Lukashenka, is a Belarusian poet. Therefore, it is no wonder that he used his campaign appearance on television as an opportunity to quote from his writings. The following unlovely four-liner (rendered lightheartedly into English by your author) clearly alludes to Lukashenka's habit of roller-skiing in summer:

I am on the asphalt
but I cannot glide.
Are my skis lazy?
Or am I out of my mind?

This seasonal outburst of democracy in Belarus has even produced a rehearsal of the popular revolution that his contenders want to launch on October Square in Minsk on December 19, immediately after the closure of polling stations.

Just 1,500 people turned out for the revolution rehearsal on November 24. This does not bode too well for the upcoming premiere. However, the most striking feature of this rehearsal was not its turnout but the transmission of the Belarusian opposition's appeal to Belarusians to take part in the rehearsal on November 24 and the opening night on December 19 by Russian television's First Channel in its prime-time newscast.

Thus, in this election campaign Brussels seems liable to prop up the Lukashenka regime with recognition and money, while Moscow is working to undermine it. And Hugo Chavez is extending his helping hand to Alyaksandr Lukashenka across the ocean by regularly sending him tankers with Venezuelan oil to make up for reduced Russian supplies. And Viktor Yanukovych, Moscow's best friend in Kyiv, is helping Lukashenka transport Venezuelan oil from tankers mooring at the Odesa oil terminal to Belarus and to lessen Russian economic pressure on someone who once was Moscow's best friend in Minsk.

We are living in postmodernist times when, as the saying goes, the media validate reality. What we see in Belarus now is a reality validated by a B-movie comedy. Once this comedy is over, a grimmer movie is likely to catch our attention.

-- Jan Maksymiuk

Tags: Alyaksandr Lukashenka

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Aliaksandr Holad from: CWA
December 01, 2010 21:09
Excellent article! Great facts and points. Keep up the good work. I'm hoping for a great turn out.
Long Live Belarus!

by: Joe Sabino from: Prague
December 02, 2010 19:48
A couple of comments to this article:

- The gathering in October Square was NOT a reversal for the publicized joint protest of the opposition candidates. That was an action of one of the candidates, which a restricted number of people knew about. Nevertheless, the result was excellent.

- The elections will not be fair and democratic. The main instrument used by Lukashenko's regime is the so called "anticipated vote". Thousands of voters are forced to vote before the election day, so that manipulation can be made away from "observing" eyes. Not a word in the article about this.

- There is no electoral campaign in Belarus. It's a one man show in the state controlled media. This fact, by itself, it's enough to classify this elections as fraud.

by: Catherine Fitzpatrick from: New York
December 03, 2010 05:38
This sort of article is among the reasons Belarus never gets taken seriously and helps it to keep failing. I recall an RFE/RL analyst who once said to me, "Belarus isn't a country, it's a profession," as if those active on it merely exist on grants or illusions.

There's always this snide caricaturizing of the Belarus opposition, always derided for being "disunited" or "too pro-Russian" or "too absolutist".

As if the West is united about how to deal with Russia?! As if the European Union has solid agreement about one economic model? As if there aren't some pretty ridiculous Western leaders -- and oppositions, too?

Belarus gets hammered merely because it is a microcosm in which we can all see ourselves.

Every time the opposition stirs itself, there will be sure to be found a Radio Liberty analyst or reporter who will sneer that it is weak, ineffective, divided, and either too idealistic or too pro-Russian. It's *never enough*. One wonders what the ideal *would* be. How it would *ever* change. What a unification that the EU "old and new Europe" hasn't succeeded in making would look like in a place with much less affluence.

Russia is never going to go away as a neighbour. Any Belarusian government has to have a plan for positively engaging Russia and Europe both. It can't wish Russia away. So whoever succeeds will have to have some sort of positive plan for Russia. Will that ever be acceptable to RFE/RL's Belarusian service? Likely not.

As for the trip by Sikorski and Westerwelle, which didn't get enough attention in the mainstream press, it is surely tendentiously portrayed here. Sikorski is certainly not interested in giving $3.9 billion to the Lukashenka *regime*. That's really preposterous. The money is for *the country of Belarus* -- which I realize some have a hard time of imagining. If Lukashenka ran the elections fairly, he *might* lose or he *might* be forced to share power. Could you stand that prospect?! I'm less sure about Westerwelle, but I can't imagine Germany somehow relishes a near neighbor and business partner that remains dictatorial and yet weak.

Obviously, if Polish and German leaders wanted to keep Lukashenka in power, they wouldn't have to make a trip *now*, would they?! they could wait with their billions until after the election. So it seems they are doing their best.

As for Nyaklyayeu, why isn't ok to be a poet?! Havel was a playwright.

Revolution rehearsal?! Erm, was it tweeted? Why is it that the peoples of these countries have to turn 100,000 people out in the main square before both the international media and the powers of the world are willing to confront their dictators and take them seriously? We should be celebrating the fact that 1,500 people are still found to take a moral stance many in the West aren't willing to take on the Belarusian dictatorship, in a setting where politicians and journalists disappear or have mysterious deaths.

Why are *they* the problem if they turn out less than the magic wire service number, from among the ranks of their young people willing to be beaten and jailed?

There isn't anything postmodernist or B-movie about Belarus, Jan, although it looks that way to the cynical exile.

Belarus has a chance December 19. It's as much up to the great powers surrounding this long-suffering nation as it is to the Belarusians themselves. We don't need the Belarusians to go on being martyrs for our cause, to prove that Russia is wicked or the West venal. We know all that. Finding a way out does start with an offer *for the country* if the current dictator figures out a way to leave the stage gracefully.

by: Johann from: USA
December 03, 2010 15:49
What is wrong with that Yanukovych is allowing Belarus to truck oil from Odessa to Minsk ? Anyhow, Ukrainians, Moldovians, and Belorussians have common interest in fighting Russian influence. Capitalism is capitalism !
This oil transport is a business matter, not a political action !!!
Please, don't mix together politics and business.
In Response

by: Johann from: USA
December 04, 2010 12:26
Ramanchuk and the potatoes.
It costs obviously more to product a potato in Belarus.
Belorussian farm worker has at least tree times higher paycheck than his brother in Morocco.
We need smart people to run against Lukashenko.
People in politics must have some business experience. .
Or maybe Harvard diploma.


by: Tutaishiy from: Belarus
December 18, 2010 17:24
Dear Jan,
Did you visit Belarus recently?
Your article is very subjective and does not present the real situation on the ground. I would say - very shallow and superficial.
Come and visit and talk with people - grassroots and then write.
The same invitation- to others commenter . It is not so simple and obvious as in your article. Also would like to recommend to review Chevengur book by Platonov and get some intellectual insights. Do not be so cheap wiritng about our country.
Respectfully,
Tutaishiy

About This Blog

Written by RFE/RL editors and correspondents, Transmission serves up news, comment, and the odd silly dictator story. While our primary concern is with foreign policy, Transmission is also a place for the ideas -- some serious, some irreverent -- that bubble up from our bureaus. The name recognizes RFE/RL's role as a surrogate broadcaster to places without free media. You can write us at transmission+rferl.org