Saturday, May 26, 2012


Commentary

Biased Balkan TV Helps Forge Differences

Croatian current affairs program "Puls Hrvatske" ("Croatian Pulse.")
TEXT SIZE - +
By Nenad Pejic
The managing board of Radio-Television Serbia (RTS) apologized on May 23 for "insults, slander and hate speech" in its programs in the early 1990s.

A statement on the website of the TV and radio outlet said the apology was meant for "the citizens of Serbia and neighboring countries."

RTS's managing board noted that that TV propaganda had "hurt the feelings, moral integrity and dignity of the Serbian citizens, intellectuals, members of political opposition, journalists, ethnic and religious minorities, as well as certain neighboring peoples and states.".

A recent RFE/RL report told the story of two young friends, Arijana and Tesnima, who live in the Bosnian village of Bocinje, around 170 km northeast of Sarajevo.

Nothing unusual for 10-year-old girls, but Arijana is an Orthodox Serb and Tesnima is a Wahabbi Muslim.

When an RFE/RL reporter asked them how they identify Christian and Muslims, Tesnima said: "I wear a headscarf and she does not!" Arijana added: "But I do respect her headscarf and we all should!"

Arijana and Tesnima, fortunately, do not watch political TV shows. Otherwise they could not be close friends and their relationship would be filled with acrimony.

A serious Bosnian crisis over a referendum announced by Bosnian Serbs on the competencies of judicial institutions and the High Representative for Bosnia ended earlier this month with the visit of Catherine Ashton, the EU High Commissioner for Foreign Affairs.

She convinced Milorad Dodik, president of the Bosnian Serb entity Republika Srpska, to give up on the referendum idea.

"60 Minutes," a TV show aired in Sarajevo, described Bosnian Serb President Milorad Dodik's deal with EU foreign-affairs chief Catherine Ashton as a "capitulation."

Naturally, local TV stations devoted their talk shows to the resolution of the crisis.

I watched all of them, and have come to the conclusion that the local media, and the proprietors who control them, work to create new crises.

As war 20 years ago in the former Yugoslavia was provoked by the media, so are the new crises today.

The talk show "60 Minutes," aired in Sarajevo by Federation TV, described the deal that Ashton reached with the Republika Srpska leadership as Dodik's "capitulation."

Not Journalism But Propaganda

The program editorialized by saying "We are sorry to see Dodik so concerned, depressed and humiliated. Where is his famous aggressiveness? The famous effrontery was lost. What happened to his primitive disdain? The threat of replacement was the only thing that could transform Dodik from a verbal barbarian into a scared boy!"

The vocabulary of the show's moderator is not befitting that of a proper journalist, of course. It is that of a propagandist.

Nobody from Dodik's side was given a chance to express their opinion. A segment featuring discussion from the United Nations Security Council meeting on May 15 showed statements from the UN High Representative for Bosnia and extracts from the statements of the US and UK ambassadors. No word was heard from the Russian ambassador.

The same evening, a talk show called "Presing" ("Press Briefing") was aired on Republika Srpska TV. The guests from Banja Luka and Belgrade praised Dodik for an excellent job.

Characteristic statements from those who dominated the show included the following: "This is the first time somebody from the EU came to praise us!"; "Republic Srpska became an EU partner!"; "UN High Representative has been marginalized!"; "Dodik proved to be a great statesman!"; "We are proud of our president!"; "This is our victory!"

After watching this talk show, a viewer would have got the feeling that the president of Republika Srpska managed to achieve a great victory over the United States, the High Representative and a majority of European Union countries.

"Even the international media report that Republic Srpska, for the first time, made good decisions," said a representative of Dodik's party.

Nobody dared to ask the obvious question: If these were the first good decisions, who made all the bad ones?

Finally, I watched a Croatian TV program called "Puls Hrvatske" ("Croatian Pulse.")

Here are some representative quotes: "The Social Democratic Party of Bosnia-Herzegovina (SDP) chooses good Serbs and Croats thanks to Muslim votes!"; "SDP is a Muslim party that uses its civic society-type declarations as a cover!"; "Bosnia has never been a state as a result of internal agreement and its existence has always been forced by foreign powers!"

When one of the studio guests addressed the strongest party of Bosnian Croats, (HDZ) and told them: "You share responsibility because you have been in power for 20 years," he received the following answer: "You hate Croats!"

Nobody from the SDP got a chance to express their opinion.

Us And Them

All of these television stations are public institutions yet all three of them serve distinct political and, even worse, parochial ethnic interests. But they are funded by all citizens.

Every day, every hour and every minute, these stations tell their views about "us" against "them." "We" are always right; "they" are always wrong. "We" are always for democracy; "they" are "always" on the opposite side.

"We" and "they" divisions have been deliberately forged and forced upon citizens of the western Balkans, who have been given little chance to make conclusions based on facts.

The media is preparing new crises; the very same way they prepared for war 20 years ago. Serbian TV admitted this is exactly what they had been doing. But there have been no consequences for any editor or political leader. The current Serbian RTS manager is known for promoting hate speech in 1990s.

At some point Arijana and Tesmina, the best friends from the beginning of this story, will start watching TV talk shows and become suspicious of each other.

Wearing a headscarf will not be respectable among Orthodox Christians, and those who do not wear them will become enemies of Muslims.

Their friendship will be lost.

Nenad Pejic is an associate director of broadcasting at RFE/RL. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Hhm from: U.S
May 26, 2011 20:39
Headscarf? Really? That is what creates the differences? Waering a headscarf? No.

It is not uncommon for Orthodox Christians to wear headscarves, too. Go to any deeply devout Orthodox village in Ukraine, Serbia, Bulgaria, Russia, Belarus and your likely to find old woman and church goers (Especially among the old Orthodox bleivers) wearing a colorful headscarf. The head-scarve is as Christian as it is Muslim. It's just that in the West, that 60 yrs of radical-liberalism, anti-Christian agenda has completly wiped the head-scarves from the Christian society. Even so-called devout Christian in the U.S don't cover their head anymore to attend church. Before the 60s in U.S every woman would attend Catholic church with a head-scarf, and that was the same for much of protestant, Luthern, Catholic Western-Europe before WW2.

The head coveering is not a Muslim practice. It is in fact a Christian one, first started among Christians. It's just that Christians are no longer serious Christians and literal believers like they use to be.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
May 27, 2011 10:24
The headscarf can be traced back to the Assyrians and Babylonians. It was also customary among the ancient Greeks and Romans for women of high standing to cover their hair. Jews took it fromthere; Christians and Muslims took it from there too, because in the Middle East it has always been customary for women to cover their hair. A headscarf is part of the traditional costume virtually everywhere in europe. Yet some discriminate against Muslims women for wearing it. That's hypocrisy! Leave us Mooslims alone!

by: Felipe Muñoz from: Santiago, Chile
May 26, 2011 20:44
Nice article Pejic. However, that's the harsh reality that faces Bosnia... and i still asking.. Why the EU are keeping together by force this zombie country??. The only ones that considers Bosnia as a 'nation' are the muslim mayority. But, in the other side, croats and serbs are more and more fed up with this european Frankenstain. EU has to realize that the bosnian-serb referendum is the first expression of the failure of this 'unified Bosnia'. the bosnian-croats are also worried about thier rights, living with the overwheelming muslims in that entity (Croat-Muslim Federation). What are the EU is waiting??. The EU is commiting a serious mistake by avoiding the reality that Bosnia is NOT a single country. The best thing for the peace of Europe is to independice Republika Srpska, as well as give the croats the right to decide if create a new country or joining Croatia; and give the muslims their own country. Any other 'experiment' will be destinated to generate more hatred and tension inside Bosnia... After all, Lebanon have a similar system... however, that didn´t avoided the Civil War, as well as the current domestic tensions between faiths. Sad but true... if the EU wants to avoid a new Lebanon, finish with this fake 'unified Bosnia', for the peace of their own people... not the ones in Brussels or Washington DC.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
May 27, 2011 07:54
Yeah, you would legalize genocide and ethnic cleansing, ghettoize the majority Bosniak population onjust 25% of the land and give aggressors and fascists the message that genocide and ethnic cleansing are rewarded. No! My counterpropoosal is that Serbs and Croats who don't like Bosnia leave and go to their mother countries! By your logic, if the Mapuches want to be independent then you must grant them independence too. And rightly so, becaquse you whites have oppressed them for so long! (I suppose you are white) Ah, but since the Bosniaks are Muslims it is all right for you (I suppose you are a Christian of Serb origin) to slap them around, right? But you don't have Ratko Mladic any more to do the dirty work! And Bosnia has existed for over 1000 years! And i will continue to do so!

by: Aleksandro
June 10, 2011 00:56
I disagree with you completely Abdulmajid. Bosnia and herzegovina is much the homeland and motherland of croats and serbs as it is by muslim bosniaks regardless of what the country may be called now. In fact, serbs and croats have long existed in bosnia before the present-day muslim-bosniaks as islam was introduced by the ottoman turks after the invasion of the balkans. This is the invasion which serbs, croats, bulgarians, and greeks tried to fight off .This is the complexity of the entire region as these serbs and croats did not want to suddenly become part of a newly created bosnian-muslim enitity. This does not excuse atrocities which may have happened during the war, but it was a war none the less, and all sides participated. I think for to country to move forward, division is the only option, as squabble between the ethnicities will otherwise always stand in the way of progress.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
June 12, 2011 16:09
Forget it! After all, who gets what? And even if a formula for equitable partition could be found, partition of the Indian subcontinent or ofr Ireland has not brought pece to the region. ANd so, because teh Bosniaks and a proportion of Serbs and Croats decided to become Muslims 400 or 500 years ago, does that mean that they have lesser rights than those who stayed Christians? That's the idea you are always peddling, that the Bosniaks are lesser human beingsand should therefore be accorded the role of losers in tis war. And when I say that all those who don't likebeing in Bosnia should moive out you hypocrites say "then let teh Bosnbiaksgo toTurkey or Saudi Arabia". People liek you are really horribleand I do not like the idea of shar ing the plante with the likes of you. Bosniaks will prevail. Next time you try to exterminate them or to ghettoize them and to turn them into the Palestinians of Europe you will not have it so easy as in 1992.
In Response

by: Paul from: Australia
June 14, 2011 06:09
Share the plate. The war would of never happened if the bosnian extremists wanted to share the land lol...educate your self

Latest Commentary

No records found for this widget:963

More Commentary

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (2 total)

Gushing gush: Your Kadirov and his new minister look like Mongols, but blonde Mongols. Are ... More

Protests Haunt Baku Eurovision Final

Latest Comment (1 total)

super-sonic-Arab-rocket: may be these idiots will arrest all of Azerbaijan until Eurovision ends ! ... More

Last 10 Eurovision Finalists Picked

Latest Comment (5 total)

Camel Anaturk: Meine Liebling EuGenio,we heard and read all about that on radio the Voice ... More