Saturday, May 26, 2012


Features

Disfigured Woman Hails 'Eye-For-An-Eye' Blinding Of Attacker In Iran

Ameneh Bahrami, in Barcelona for one of more than a dozen operations since the attack, holds a photograph of herself before Majid Movahedi dumped a bucket of acid on her outside her workplace in 2004.
TEXT SIZE - +
By RFE/RL
An Iranian woman who was blinded and badly disfigured by an acid attack by a spurned suitor has expressed strong support for a retributive blinding sentence to be carried out against her attacker.

The court-ordered plan for "retribution in kind" is to place five drops of sulfuric acid in each of Majid Movahedi's eyes for the 2004 incident, when he poured a bucket of acid on Ameneh Bahrami, ultimately leaving her blind and forcing her to undergo at least 17 operations.

The acid drops were scheduled to be administered at a hospital in the Iranian capital on May 14, but the blinding has now been postponed. Iran's semi-official ISNA news agency, which reported the postponment, gave no reason and did not reveal the source of the announcement.

Bahrami, now 32, has insisted on Movahedi's blinding despite being urged by the court to accept financial compensation from the attacker's family instead.

Since the judgment was handed down in 2008, Iranian and international rights activists have expressed horror at the prospect of its implementation by a state ostensibly bound by international agreements prohibiting cruel and inhumane punishment.

'I Wish I Could Drip It Myself'

Bahrami reiterated her strong support for the retributive sentence in an interview with RFE/RL's Radio Farda on the eve of its planned implementation, saying she was "happy" that Movahedi's blinding was finally taking place.

"I wish I could drip it myself," Bahrami told RFE/RL on May 13. "Many times when I was dripping medical drops into my eyes -- I always do it myself -- I thought it's possible."

She added: "I wanted to touch [his] eyes and then pour the acid, but I thought it's not [possible] because my hands might burn, so a physician will be there and will do it."

Rights group Amnesty International has appealed to Iranian authorities to prevent the sentence being carried out and pointed out that "obliging a doctor to administer such a punishment would violate international medical ethics codes."

In a statement on the group's website, Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, deputy director of Amnesty International's Middle East and North Africa Program, expresses disbelief that "Iranian authorities would consider implementing such a punishment."

"Regardless of how horrific the crime suffered by Ameneh Bahrami, being blinded with acid is a cruel and inhuman punishment amounting to torture," Sahraoui is quoted as saying, "and the Iranian authorities have a responsibility under international law to ensure it does not go ahead."

'Not The Solution'

Islamic jurisprudence adheres to the notion of an "eye for an eye" under a principle known as "qisas."

Bahrami insisted that "this is not revenge" but acknowledged that "I want to punish" the attacker.

"I want to make sure other women will not suffer like me," she told Radio Farda.

There are no reliable statistics available on the number of acid attacks against women in Iran.

Maria Rashidi, a Swedish-based women's rights activist and herself the victim of an acid attack, suggests that Movahedi's sentence would not prevent such crimes.

"This is the spreading of barbarism, the spreading of violence in society," says Rashidi, who lost part of her eyesight in an attack by her husband and has undergone numerous surgeries.

"I've thought about this for years in hospital beds," Rashidi says. "'Qisas' is not the solution -- what Ameneh needs is really good treatment."

Moral Dilemma?

Amnesty International says one of the procedures that Ameneh underwent was an effort in a Spanish hospital to reconstruct her face.

She has tried to raise money through the Internet for her mounting medical bills and said some Iranians have offered her to help raise fund for her medical treatment but have also asked her to stop the sentence against her attacker.

"Today some asked me how much money will make me give up the sentence," Bahrami said. "I said if I receive 2 million euros, I will give it up. They said, 'Give us some time.' I said I have waited for two years, I've talked about it in newspapers, my future has to be insured and not only my future, I have to know other [victims] will receive help. But unfortunately I found out that people like me are left alone in Iran, they are on their own."

Bahrami's case and her demand for Movahedi to be blinded have received widespread attention among Iranians. Many say they support Bahrami and believe Movahedi will get what he deserves.

A Radio Farda listener who identified herself as Massoumeh from Tehran offered support for the woman who had a normal life snatched from her in her 20s, saying: "None of us can put [ourself] in Ameneh's place. But I think Ameneh's [decision] is very right, because this is not the first time something like this is happening in this country -- this should be a lesson for others."

Others have called on Bahrami to give up her demand for retribution, saying that the sentence will only breed more violence.

Ameneh Bahrami was interviewed by Radio Farda broadcaster Niusha Boghrati; written by Golnaz Esfandiari in Washington with Andy Heil in Prague
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments page of 2
    Next 
by: SOMI from: ROME
May 14, 2011 09:09
EX PRESDINET kHATAMI was from the persons who helped AMENEH when she was in Spain,but after the electinos that AHMaDINeJAD became the president,he stoped the support from Ameneh and she turned to IRAN! if amene could see after the operations now she wouldn't think to QESAS!

by: Jeanette Grayeb-Mihal from: USA
May 14, 2011 12:58
A more suitable punishment would be to put the man in solitary confinement for the remainder of his life so he can have an opportunity to reflect on this horrific crime. Blinding him would serve no purpose, and would not stop further violence against women. The mindset must change in the Middle East, and men must be held accountable for such unspeakable crimes. Financial support should be afforded this woman, and hopefully she will be able to move forward in her life.
In Response

by: Shayan
May 16, 2011 16:09
It is very naive to suppose that just putting him away at the expense of the public will serve any purpose. Unless you have been the victim of a violent crime, it can be hard to understand what constitutes justice to someone who has been inconceivably harmed.

by: Martin from: Dublin
May 14, 2011 14:02
Whilst one can understand the desire for retribution for the cowardly and inhumane attack on Bahrami, to enforce such a law will essentially give weight to the very kind of system that made her attacker think it was ok to treat a woman like she was property, and not a person. This is why justice should never be left in the hands of the wronged. It is for an objective and unbiased court to apply the rule of law, as it is understood nationally, and as it is accepted by international bodies such as the UN.
In Response

by: ali
May 16, 2011 18:05
Martin, It is in the hands of the law and not the wronged; the victim according to the law has certain options. She cannot for example decide he should die or in this case the law requires that the process be carried out by proper medical procedures. The difference with your Western standard is that we beleive the State was not wronged in this case; Bahrami was. The State defines the law and oversees its application but the victim decides which legal options should apply. I think it is a more flexible system than yours. Fir one thing I have seen the father of one youth forgive another who had killed him in an altercation. Can the State forgive a crime completely in the West? Is that not a profound weakness in your legal system?
In Response

by: Martin from: Dublin
May 21, 2011 22:55
Ali - the law in 'the west' as you ascribe it, is usually based on the rights of all individuals. It considers that the law, and justice, should be abstracted from anger so that all may benefit equally.

The system you describe sounds absolutely barbaric to me. It's completely disgusting to think that a person either broken with grief or wild with anger can be trusted to fairly apply the law.

The state cannot forgive a crime in the west - we don't give that kind of power to the state, we codify it so that it is safe from abuse by individuals. The way you describe it in your system, it would be much more likely for a friend of the state to get away with crime than say, a poor person.

I am thankful I live in a community and system where everyone is treated the same and where justice is not at the whim of some individual. There are weaknesses in our system, but we can change them without reference to a mythical being in the sky, and they are not, in fact, profound.

I am also happy that fundamental human rights are respected and that barbaric crimes are not carried out by the state. We adhere to the notion of the inalienable right to the integrity of the body, and the dignity of all humans.

Your system is horrific. Tell me, for instance, what happens when someone who has been blinded by the state later turns out to be innocent?


by: SARA MANI from: LONDON
May 14, 2011 16:38
I hope after Ameneh's attacker is blinded he will spend the rest of his life in prison. Ameneh will be in physical and emotional pain for the rest of her life. I also disagree this sentence will not stop other men doing this, this case has had a lot of publicity and hopefully other men will think twice before attacking women.

by: Kiumars from: Iran
May 14, 2011 16:49
Forget about an eye, the guy must be burned to death alive.
In Response

by: Martin from: Dublin
May 21, 2011 22:57
Kiumars - your comment disgusts me. Your type of thinking -the thinking that it is every alright to harm another, is the kind of thinking that caused Ameneh's attacker to believe that it was in any way allowable or appropriate to harm her. I hope you reflect on your hate and garner some wisdom and dignity.

by: JL1680 from: England
May 14, 2011 19:35
Though I am far from supporting these types of violent punishments, in such cases as these they seem almost warranted. It sounds as if these acid attacks are actually somewhat common--that is, this was not considered to be an anomalous act. If womens rights is to make gains in Iran, the proper incentive structures need be put in place such that men are not driven to do these sorts of things. Again, my Western liberal ideals cannot outright condone retributive blinding of another sentient being, but what kind of punishment would be appropriate for such a crime? Simple jail time seems not nearly enough.

by: scallywag from: nyc
May 15, 2011 00:14
Could one physically imagine sitting there in a hospital bed waiting for their victim to administer the eye drops? And what about Ms Ameneh, wiill exacting this type of punishment heal the deep wounds and injustices that have been dealt to her? Wouldn’t she on some level be continuing the cycle of violence that she seeks to address? Which is to say- does violence beget justice, or to be even coarse- does Ms Ameneh now not become the very criminal that she wishes to repudiate?

http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2011/05/an-eye-for-an-eye-an-iranian-court-has-postponed-blinding-a-convicted-man-at-the-llth-hour/

by: Dan from: USA
May 15, 2011 07:18
Give the lady her due justice. My words cannot describe the failure of a society, religion and ethics that allows this male action. Make a public punishment to encourage the others that they think of their just desserts. This evil will happen again. These barbarians aren't eliminated in a generation - but they can be eliminated. Let Iran join the civilized nations and rid itself of barbaric social institutions such as male revenge for naught but dismissal.
In Response

by: Martin from: Dublin
May 21, 2011 23:01
Dan - as a citizen of the USA - I assume you live in a society free from murder, considering the use of the death penalty there? Actually - now that I check the crime rates, i see that murders have increased since its re-introduction.

Can't you see that it is your kind of hate that is the problem? When we work for societies where all are afforded dignity and respect, then these kind of crimes will be come rare. We can't 'eradicate evil' as if it's a trait like brown hair, or left handedness. That's a childish notion. Hurting people is NEVER right, especially when done in cold blood, by the state.

by: James from: US
May 15, 2011 11:20
This is just punishment for the man, he is fortunate not to get a bucket of acid thrown on him. I hope they go forward with this. No person should be able to treat another person this way without suffering greatly for their deed. The death penalty would be to humane a punishment for this wicked attacker. Be bold Iran, do what is right and punish this attacker. The victim deserves justice to be served for this horrific crime.

by: Layla
May 16, 2011 11:37
How the hell do these men keep getting their hands on acid?? Is it at the local corner store? There should be a waiting period for stuff like that, akin to handguns in America, and it should be tracked. Sheesh....
Comments page of 2
    Next 

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (2 total)

Gushing gush: Your Kadirov and his new minister look like Mongols, but blonde Mongols. Are ... More

Protests Haunt Baku Eurovision Final

Latest Comment (1 total)

super-sonic-Arab-rocket: may be these idiots will arrest all of Azerbaijan until Eurovision ends ! ... More

Last 10 Eurovision Finalists Picked

Latest Comment (5 total)

Camel Anaturk: Meine Liebling EuGenio,we heard and read all about that on radio the Voice ... More