Wednesday, May 22, 2013


Transmission

Bosnian Town Elects Woman Mayor, Islamic Head Scarf And All

Amra Babic, the newly elected mayor of the central Bosnian town of Visoko
Amra Babic, the newly elected mayor of the central Bosnian town of Visoko
TEXT SIZE - +
A local election outside Sarajevo has produced some notable news related to tolerance and government in Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Beset with obstacles to effective governance since the Dayton Peace Agreement in late 1995, Bosnia remains riven in many ways by religious and ethnic discord between its Muslim, ethnic Croatian, and ethnic Serbian communities.

But voters in the 40,000-resident town of Visoko on October 7 elected a woman mayor, Amra Babic, who wears the Islamic head scarf.

Babic, a trained economist and former finance minister on the canton level, hailed the choice as "a model for Europe and Islam" in an AFP story. She called it "a great victory of democracy."

"I will never abuse politics for religion," Babic was quoted as saying. "If I have the strength to protect my own rights, I will find the strength to protect the rights of others."

RFE/RL's Balkan Service says the news has received scant attention in local media, noting that head scarves are not necessarily a reflection of closely held religious beliefs so much as a routine fashion accessory.

They suggest it's a clear victory for Bosnian women, however.

That's a perspective that Babic herself embraced, saying, "My fellow citizens showed a great open spirit because they elected me first as a woman but also as a woman who wears a veil."

The victory has been picked up by media outlets from Iran to Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, calling her "Europe's first hijab-wearing mayor."

Babic is a member of the late Alija Izetbegovic's Party of Democratic Action, a leading party among Bosnia-Herzegovina's Muslims that played a historic role in independence.

The Islamic head scarf, or hijab, was illegal in the former Yugoslavia.

Babic told AFP that she never wore one until turning to Islam for comfort after the death of her husband, with whom she has three children, in the Bosnian conflict of 1992-95. She now heads a civic group that brings together the families of Muslim men killed in that fighting.

"I put on the veil after my husband's death," she recalls, adding that the religion had helped her to overcome the loss.

"My religion tells me that everything that happens is God's will. It helped me to concentrate my energy and survive. My sons are my greatest motivation," she said.

-- Andy Heil
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Ed from: Sarajevo
October 11, 2012 14:54
The hijab was not illegal in Yugoslavia. There were women that wore it in Yugoslavia. It may have been looked down upon, but it was not illegal. The article should be corrected.
In Response

by: Anonymous
October 11, 2012 23:02
"It may have been looked down upon, but it was not illegal"
In plain language they were discriminated.
In Response

by: vn from: Belgrade
October 12, 2012 10:12
Could we please have a single name of a prominent woman-official in any "non-discriminatory" EU country or the USA wearing a hijab? And by the way, if there is anything to be deducted from this article is that there is an ongoing discrimination against Christian names.
In Response

by: Anonymous
October 13, 2012 20:07
by the way do I give a damn what some apologist criminal serb thinks? NO!

by: Jack from: US
October 11, 2012 15:45
US president's wife Laura Bush wore a hijab on her visits to Muslim countries. US president G.W.Bush called Islam a "religion of peace" and he successed in killing 7,000 American servicemen in Iraq and Afghanistan, in addition to 3,000 Americans killed by US government's Sunni allies on 9/11
In Response

by: Aisha from: Poland
November 06, 2012 05:13
G.W.Bush from a bush, uncivilised as he is, has killed at least twice that number of Iraqui and Afghan civilians in that stupid war, before he sent to death his own people. He is even suspected to stand behind the World Trade Center attacks which are widely thought to be a provocation in order to bring the third world war as a result, because there are always people who make money on the war... They have a business in maintaining the conflict between the East and the West. It's that simple... And Bush is basically a satanist because he studied in Yale and he is a member of the Skull&Bones Society which is a secret illuminati branch operating at that university where he studied. The name of Skull&Bones speaks for itself. Haven't you heard of G.W.Bush attending the Bohemian Groove satanist rituals and other interesting findings on most American politicians and other most influential people of the West? If not, then simply google it and you shall find everything there. There is just too much of a strange coincidence in this world's history, past and present, in order to simply dismiss all the existing conspiracy theories as pure fiction... ;-*

A.B.

by: Mutic from: Colorado
October 11, 2012 18:24
In Yugoslavia, including Bosnia, there were no restrictions on religious clothing, education, or practices. However, the Communist Party membership was encouraged for many employment positions and public displays of religious beliefs were not compatible with the Party doctrine.

There is nothing revolutionary or incredible about this election victory. Bosnia has a long tradition of women's rights and women in positions of power are not a novelty.

In Response

by: Anonymous
October 11, 2012 23:03
Really? I know, they didn't have any restriction on genocide of Muslims either.

by: Vakhtang from: Moscow
October 12, 2012 03:31
I want to know when finally appear in Europe prime minister nudist...
I think nudist has the same right to be prime minister as a woman in a headscarf..

Just imagine how wonderful it is when somewhere in the Council of Europe meet and shake hands two prime minister-woman in a headscarf and naked man...
In Response

by: Enida from: kakanj
October 12, 2012 23:40
Women in hijjab-headscarf do not shake hands to men.
In Response

by: April from: New York
October 14, 2012 16:58
This is a question, not criticism: Why don't women in hijjabs not shake hands with men? Does it have to with sexual attraction? My suggestion is that muslim men wear burquas with crosshatched eye holes. That way they won't be able to lust after women, and women can wear what they want. I always look at women in silk saris or hijjabs and think how hot it must be in the summer. Especially BMOs, "black moving objects", what some Saudi men call women in Saudi Arabia. Why don't Saudi men try wearing black robes in summer? Let women wear white. Though I respect cultural and religious differences, as an American, I feel anyone should be able to wear whatever she or he wants.
In Response

by: Enida from: Kakanj
October 15, 2012 11:37
Not shaking hands to men comes from the religion to prevent lust and so. At some point it can be explained as a logical move: touching a hand or being touched can cause tiny mysterious pleasant feeling dragging us to have it longer (well, in my case though, touching my hand can cause a whole storm, lol).
Now BMO's only tells about the society where the expression came from, especially about those men. Personally, I wouldn't like to live in such a place, and can't discuss it all cause I myself can't completely understand or accept their tradition. But what I can tell is that here in Bosnia we wear as we like: some women wear hijab, others walk around half naked, and all of them have chosen it themselves. There are no rules here when it's about clothes, except dress code in public institutions (courts, schools, etc.) as well as churches, mosques, etc., which is all normal.
I agree it is difficult to wear black burkas at 50 Celsius, but if it's their choice... Or is it? Surely, what we see is different from what it is: we see long head to toe black "bags" walking around thinking "they must be boiling"; contrary, they look at us from under tiny black silk cover shading them from direct sun thinking "they must be burning in this sun". While they wear the tiny cover and tinier dress, we wear pants, bras, cotton shirts, skirts or trousers, and etc. things trying to look dressed and still not to warm in it-it's all tight on us, no a breath of air to cool; on the other side, silk cools them all the time, air is all around their bodies, their skin can breathe.
Well, it is also scientifically proved that the more we cover from the direct sun, the less warmth we will feel...
I still wouldn't like to wear hijab, but it's all the matter of choice.
In Response

by: Aisha from: Poland
November 06, 2012 05:34
Oh, they sometimes do, although they perhaps shouldn't, yet there are few less strict ladies in headscarf with a more relaxed approach when it comes to simply shaking hands as an act of diplomacy and international etiquette. Apart from that, they behave modestly and they seem to have no any problem with hand shaking in situations when it is simply considered impolite not to shake a hand. However, the etiquette also says that it isn't proper for a man to shake hands with a woman unless with her permission; if she doesn't give her hand first, that is a sign there is no permission and there should be no shaking hands, but that etiquette applies to hand shaking as a form of greeting, while in a business setting, the guidelines are different. For exaple, a gentleman should always pull out a chair for a lady at a table, but on a business meeting, everyone is sitted unassisted, ladies included. I think the same applies to hand shaking, for example upon reaching an agreement in negotiations, dealing with business, in a professional setting when it may be considered impolite, even rude, not to shake hands. And then, I've come across the opinions of some of our religious scholars who address that case as an exception when hand shaking may occur, provided it is completely in good intentions, as after all, it's but a handshake; it isn't a crime as sinful as for example, adultery or not praying the daily prayers, or not keeping fast in Ramadan. It may only become evil when it leads to further evil such as the above mentioned sins. But otherwise, it isn't evil by itself, in its very nature. This is my understanding and my personal approach, too. ;-) Greetings!

A.B.

by: Human from: Earth
October 12, 2012 04:07
All this Tito times nostalgia is Serb-Croation chauvenism masked as "internationalism" or " communism."

Aliya Izetbegovic and 100s like him spent years in jail because they wanted to practice Islam as it is, not approved by the Yugoslavian (read as Serbian) political elites. So do not write myth here about "free" Yugoslavia in regards to Islam.
In Response

by: berliner49 from: colorado
October 12, 2012 15:29
A victory for women, especially Muslim women. If we could only bring other Muslim women out of the dark ages and give them some right. Most of all.......STOP child weddings.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
October 26, 2012 18:07
100% agree. Fortunately there are no child weddings in Bosnia. And Bosniak women have always been very self-confident and assertive. I have known quite a few.
In Response

by: Krajishnik
October 12, 2012 15:53
These headscarfs make me sick. In the former Yugoslavia, only old women of all faiths wore such things for the purpose of covering their gray hair. Now it's a fashion statement from the middle east.

The Yugonostalgia is still present because some saw it as a model secular society, much more so then any western nation. Religion wasn't allowed in government at any level, officials could not hold memberships at any riligious organizations.

People like Izetbegovic and Karadzic were all prisoners of Tito's regime, because their doctrines were detrimental to the nation, they preached nothing but hate. Now their dorctrines are the life phylosophy of so many ignorant youth.

by: Mark Hiefman from: Jacksonville, Florida
October 12, 2012 23:01
"My religion tells me that everything that happens is God's will."

Is she that delusional? You believe your husband getting killed was God's will. Is she that weak of a person that she needed to wear a veil to help her feel more in touch with God? A piece of cloth to cover the hair god gave you, even though she was apparently made in his image. Why in the world would she worship such a God? What a pity being educated as she is that she is a religious fanatic. I wouldn't trust her with my civil rights for a seconds. Next up, she'll start introducing Sharia Law into Bosnia. No thanks...
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
October 26, 2012 18:04
You should better have kept silent and let the world think you're an ignorant fool than putting yor finger to keyboard and confirm it.
In Response

by: helena back from: melbourne
October 30, 2012 01:05
Silence yes that would suit you. its complicit silence muslims would like anyone with an opinion is an ignorant fool and i trust by your name that you are a muslim.. religion and politics should not mix and as the quoran does not require women to cover there bodies to excess, instead dress modestly.. i think wearing a head covering to be close to god does exibit more than moderate display of ones faith.. also it is well accepted that god is within all of us, you cannot get closer to him than that.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
November 01, 2012 11:18
Helena, islamophobia is fascism. Fascism is not an opinion, it's a crime. Whoever utters islamophobia is a declared enemy of my people and I do NOT accept any lessons from declared enemies of my people. Don't even TRY.

About This Blog

Written by RFE/RL editors and correspondents, Transmission serves up news, comment, and the odd silly dictator story. While our primary concern is with foreign policy, Transmission is also a place for the ideas -- some serious, some irreverent -- that bubble up from our bureaus. The name recognizes RFE/RL's role as a surrogate broadcaster to places without free media. You can write us at transmission+rferl.org

Most Popular