Saturday, May 26, 2012


Features

Gandhi's Legacy: Civil Disobedience Takes Off In Iran

Young people shoot with water guns during a mass organized water fight in northern Tehran
TEXT SIZE - +
By Robert Tait
When Leon Panetta, the new United States defense secretary, declared on September 6 that it was only "a matter of time" before an Arab Spring-style revolution came to Iran, it seemed to smack of wishful thinking. 
 
Such predictions, after all, are hardly new from Western decision-makers eager for Tehran's Islamic theocracy to be blown away by the winds of change and replaced by a more amenable government. 
 
The hope had been strongly felt -- if largely unexpressed -- at the time of the mass street protests that followed President Mahmud Ahmadinejad's tainted reelection in 2009. 
 
And since this year's outbreak of popular uprisings that have unseated dictatorships in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, and destabilized authoritarian regimes elsewhere in the Middle-East countries, there have been numerous expressions of desire for a "Persian Spring" to go with the Arab variety. 
 
Fulfillment has been another matter. For all the upheavals convulsing its Arab neighbors, Iran has remained dormant -- not even the bloody six-month rebellion against its close ally Syria has inspired opposition groups to rise up en masse. Tentative attempts by the Green Movement, which spearheaded the 2009 protests, to organize mass demonstrations on the Egyptian model last March were comprehensively crushed by Iran's well-honed security forces. 
 
Water Fight
 
Yet now opponents of the Tehran regime feel its nemesis may finally have arrived -- in the form of proliferating acts of civil disobedience. 
 
"The Iranian regime faces a threat even more daunting than the 2009 Green Movement protests: a disparate yet potentially powerful civil disobedience movement motivated not just by politics, but by environmental, economic, and social issues," wrote Alireza Nader, an international policy analyst at the RAND Corporation, in a recent blog post. 
 
The first sign, according to Nader, appeared in July with an organized water pistol fight among young men and women in Tehran that triggered mass arrests and provoked angry questions in the Majlis, Iran's parliament, about an alleged assault on public morals and decency. Attempts to organize more water fights as a protest against the regime's social restrictiveness have subsequently been made on Facebook, leading to yet more arrests. 
 
Then in late August, a wave of protests occurred over the drying up of Iran's biggest lake, Lake Orumieh, straddling West and East Azerbaijan provinces, which has lost more than half of its volume in recent years due to extensive dam-building projects and drought. 
 
An initial demonstration by environmentalists on August 27 resulted in multiple arrests and brought the lake's plight to wider notice. It was followed a week later by much bigger protests in the cities of Orumieh and Tabriz -- footage from which was posted on YouTube -- that appeared to tap into wider discontent in Iran's Azeri-speaking regions and which were reportedly met by live fire from riot police. 
 
RFE/RL's Radio Farda reported on September 15 that more activists had been arrested for trying to organize further protests over Lake Orumieh. 
 
Nader argues that anger over the lake is mirrored by discontent over a multitude of other issues. "The Azeri demonstrators are not merely motivated by a drying lake or ethnic aspirations," he wrote. "They are driven by the anger, frustration, and indignity felt by Iranians regardless of race, religion, or gender. The Islamic Republic has left Iranians no choice but to disobey." 
 
Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, also believes the regime is peculiarly vulnerable to nonviolent disobedience. 
 
"What's so interesting with these campaigns is that they probably have a much larger number of issues that they can focus on," he says. "Who would have expected a year ago that the issue of Orumieh would have reached essentially a national scale right now? I think there can be plenty of examples and I think the government rightly is far more concerned by these forms of nonviolent protest than they are concerned about efforts by certain groups to pursue violence. They know how to handle violence. They don't know how to handle nonviolence." 
 
The drying-out Lake Orumieh has attracted mass protests in Iran

However, Scott Lucas, an Iran-specialist at Birmingham University in the U.K. and editor of the EA World View website, cautions that while such localized protests have the potential to grow, there is as yet no evidence that they can provide a bigger challenge to the regime than the Green Movement 
 
"The regime has effectively disrupted the organizations behind a lot of that disobedience," argues Lucas. "They've disrupted the student organizations, they've disrupted the lawyers, they've disrupted women's rights activists and so their response on the Lake Orumieh protests is that they swept up, we've got estimates of up to 300 people."
 
"A lot of those were just general detentions. Some of those people, however, were journalists and some of them were activists. They will try to basically defang the movement. The question is whether they can defang a whole set of specific movements if they all pop up at the same time. We are not at that point yet to be able to answer that question," Lucas says. 
 
Economic Hardship
 
Conventional wisdom suggests that the most fertile ground for mass discontent -- and, therefore, for civil disobedience -- is provided by a fragile economy. With inflation once again soaring above 20 percent and many Iranians reeling under rocketing utility bills following Ahmadinejad's abolition of subsidies last winter, the potential for protest seems obvious. 
 
One suggestion, floated months ago on the opposition website Balatarin, (http://www.iranian.com/main/blog/balatarin/civil-disobedience-gas-bills) had been for the nonpayment of astronomical gas and electricity bills. Thus far, there has been little sign of such measures getting off the ground as a concerted campaign. One expression of economic discontent has made itself in Tehran's Grand Bazaar, however, where textile merchants have been on strike for the past month over plans to make them pay value added tax (VAT). 
 
Yet as regime opponents such as Hadi Ghaemi, executive director of the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran, acknowledge, economic hardships generally hit the poor -- who may not be the best-equipped to organize civil disobedience movements. 
 
"It all depends on who would lead and organize such protests," says Ghaemi. "The Lake Orumieh one, it appears, was very well networked and the people behind it were very much focused on keeping it an environmental issue but holding the government officials accountable for what was happening to the lake. On the economic issues, I'm afraid it would be mostly the poor and the ones who are hurt most, the ones who are falling through the safety net. And whether they will have the capacity to network and organize in a peaceful way remains to be seen." 
 
While the appetite for civil disobedience is high following the crushing of the 2009 street rallies, Ghaemi says, the state is well-equipped to counteract the networking required to organize them. 
 
"Now we're in this post-protest moment, civil disobedience acts which do not target the political order directly but challenge it, I believe is what people are looking for," he says. "[But] for that you need a community of people to interact with each other around a common issue and that's what the Intelligence Ministry is so good at, preventing any formation of such networks." 
 
The key to civil disobedience succeeding, observers like Parsi agree, is weight of numbers. Only if several different issues and protests to coalesce at the same time -- stretching the government security apparatus over a wide area and prolonged period -- can such tactics hope to dislodge an entrenched regime: 
 
"Will it be done over one or two protests? Of course not," Parsi argues. "It's going to require a protracted effort that exhausts the government and also at the same time erodes any sense of moral right amongst the many elements within the government that are supposed to carry out the orders they have been receiving." 
 
Whether the will for that protracted effort exists is the $64 million question. The answer may depend on more than just "a matter of time."
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Araz from: Tabriz
September 17, 2011 13:39
Dear Mr. Tait, Thank you very much for your interesting articles about the recent events in “South Azerbaijan” and Iran. But I would like to remind you that only less than half of the Iranians are “Persians” and using the terms like “Persian Spring” is not appropriate and also is not helpful at all! One of the major reasons, that the green movement was not successful, was the fact that it is considered to be a Persian people’s matter, because the leaders of the green movement largely ignored the demands of the non-Persian ethnic groups and as a result, more than half of the Iranian population was not really active during the so called green movement. If you look back to the past two years, no remarkable protests occurred in the “South Azerbaijan” cities like Tabriz, Orumieh, Ardebil and Zanjan after the 2009 elections, but now Azerbaijanis are protesting because drying up of the lake is directly affecting their own life. Therefore, I would recommend you to avoid such terms like “Persian Spring”, if you want to help to unify the protests all over the country and instead use terms like “Iranian Spring” which can be interpreted as the combination and the unification of “Azerbaijani Spring”, “Persian Spring”, “Kurdish Spring” and so on.
In Response

by: Yashar from: Germany
September 17, 2011 18:46
Araz from Prague or Tabriz ! How touching ! You advise the author of the article not to use "Persian Spring" becuase it does not include all Iranians, yet you use "South Azerbaijan" erroneously for Iranian Azerbaijan or Azerbaijan.
So the Green Movement is all about Persians and not Iranians ! Where did you get this idea from? Is Mir Hossein Musavi a Persian or an Iranian Azeri ? Or do you think he is not a real Azeri because he does not solely speak for Azerbaijan ?
The oppression in Iran is not limited to Azeris. Kurds, Bakuchis, Lors, Gilaks, Taleshis and all other Iranians are suffering from it. You are not oppressed becuase you are Azeris. Why don't you speak for all Iranians if you consider yourself one? Why do you intend to see everything from an ethnic point of view ?
In Response

by: Alex from: US
September 17, 2011 21:26
So south azeristan and Iran are 2 different things! Look at this Azeri dreaming in Iran that they can maybe unite one day with the other azeristan in the north! You people multiplied so fast after Armenian genocide, because of so much space opened up and opportunity because Armenian were weakened by a genocide that affected Armenian population numbers for future. Armenian should of been at aroun 50 mil in the world instead of guestimating 10 mil. Now you people talk shit to Iran gov't. Israeli propaganda working hard to though that region into war, with a promise that Azeri's will have more land given to them after the war. Keep on dreaming Russian and Armenians won't let that happen. Don't like the life in Iran go to Azeristan there is no shortage of donkeys there.

by: Anonymous
September 17, 2011 23:07
You should have interviewed Jahanbeglou and not some 'analysts' who clearly don't know much about Iran.

by: Irandoost from: Iran
September 18, 2011 01:06
"Iranian Spring"??! "iran" means land of Arya, based on archaeologic and genetic findings that show the original migrants to the Iranian plateau were Arayan tribes from Europe. "Persia" derives from the word "Parsus" which was what the Greeks called all people of Iranian Platuea, (which again you are part of) and no specific race. Therefore the word "iranian" has much stronger racial/ethnic connotations than word Persian. Secondly, Studies of Mitochondrial DNA (genetic material that gets passed down purely from ours mothers and is not mixed paternal genes) clearly shows that Azaris are not just closely related to rest of the Iranian people, but they are inface the SAME whether you like it or not. We have all been invaded by Arabs, Mongols and Turks on numerous occasion thru out our ancient and medieval history, so non of us are of specefic racial or genetic lineage. So after more than 3000 years being part of Iran and genetic intermingling if you still trying to identify yourself as some how as a unique race is ignorant and racist. Your premise is based on a hollow belief. Thirdly, we are all suffering under the burden of Islamic dictatorship, its got nothing to do with "Persian' "Azeri", "Baluchi" etc etc, all of us want social and political freedom and to be able live of lives with dignity and have a government that is representative of our people and is transparent. Is it better to stand and fight this together. The only thing that separation of Iran into its falsified ethnic regions will do is to play straight into the hands of Americans and Israeli's who have written numerous books/articles on the rise of Iran as a regional superpower and its ability to shape the region. They would love to turn us into a dysfunctional fractured country like Pakistan, to make us so entrenched with our internal problems so we can no longer look behind our borders to influence the region. I'm proud of Azeri people, they have been an important part of our culture and history for thousands of years, so i realy dont understand where your animosity towards the rest of Iranian people comes from.
In Response

by: Aslan from: Edinburg
September 19, 2011 19:35
Thank you, Irandoost for your comments. This article is very good one. I hope People of Azerbaijan living under their own despotic regime can learn from Iranian People how to challenge the corrupt and brutal regime. At this time, main goal is restoring sovereignty and rights of all people living in that region. Once, civil governments are elected by people, there will be real government institutions addressing people's concerns. Otherwise, you are right that separating people into ethnic, religious, geographical groups will play into hands of 'government' thugs and their ambitions.

by: Audrey Dunham from: canada
September 18, 2011 09:38
My point to all on earth to know God your mind, body and soul(one) has to be holy and pure. Holy and pure does not create borders, wars, sucidal bombings and hate. bless you. make time to write a comment in www.ingodwetrustunderonenation.com and you tube Jane Elliott "the angry eye" and Irshad Manji Allah , love and liberty. thanks.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (5 total)

M: Ingush human rights defender Magomed Khazbiev: "Kremlin needs slaves in the Caucasus":
http://pik.tv/ru/shows/vasha-pravda/video/86/4437 More

Kingsley As Karzai?

Latest Comment (1 total)

M: they put the dictators in power and they make fun of them More

Moldova Sentences 3 On Uranium Charge

Latest Comment (1 total)

Ionas Aurelian Rus:
One should not only salute the capture of these officials by the Moldovan ... More