Saturday, May 26, 2012


Features

Interview: 'I Can't Say The Struggle Will Always Be Peaceful,' Says Uyghur Advocate Kadeer

Uyghur leader Rebiya Kadeer says she believes there will be more bloodshed in China, because the authorities continue to crack down on the Uyghur minority.
TEXT SIZE - +
At a time when Middle Eastern dictators are feeling the heat, Central Asian autocrats are worrying about the future of their own governments.

Far from her homeland, Uyghur leader Rebiya Kadeer is busy in Washington, D.C., where she is organizing a plan to rally minority Uyghurs in China. She hopes that the move will promote Uyghur independence from Chinese rule.

The story of the Uyghur struggle topped the international press in July 2009, when the minority group clashed with Han Chinese in Urumqi. Kadeer regards the Han as colonists sent by the Chinese government to change the demographic balance of power in Uyghur territory.

To Kadeer, the 2009 bloodshed gives the Uyghurs added reason to move ahead in their struggle for self-rule. If not respected by the Chinese, this struggle may also include the formation of a government in exile to highlight the Uyghur cause. RFE/RL's Muhammad Tahir recently talked with her at her home outside Washington, D.C.

RFE/RL: Let's start with a question on current affairs. Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak was recently forced to step down. Do the events in Egypt have any bearing on your own struggle?

Rebiya Kadeer:
Although Mubarak has gone, people around him are still there [in power], so it's important that the people elect someone who will give them true democracy. The Egyptian people are still demonstrating in the streets; this is a good sign.

But one thing in these events pleased me: Mubarak didn't order the army or police to suppress the demonstrators. If [the riots] had been in China, they would have been bloody. Remember what happened on July 5, 2009 [in Urumqi]? The Chinese authorities cracked down on our demonstration and as a result tens of thousands of people were killed overnight. It was similar to 1989 in Tiananmen Square.

RFE/RL : Do you think Mubarak should be allowed to leave the country to live in exile?

Kadeer:
He should be allowed. But first, he should respond to the demands of the people about his financial dealings during the last 30 years of the regime; then he should be allowed to leave the country.

RFE/RL: Do you think one day the same thing may happen in China?

Kadeer:
We hope that one day the same thing will happen, but [if so] there will be huge bloodshed in China. Tens of thousands of people will be killed, because the Chinese authorities will suppress any such action.

RFE/RL: Coming back to your Uyghur cause. In contrast to Egypt and Tunisia, Urumqi saw bloody days back in July 2009. I think that was the first time -- at least in the contemporary history of the Uyghur struggle against China -- that things became so violent. Do you think that the once-peaceful struggle of the Uyghur cause is turning violent? Do you expect more of that kind of violence to occur back in your homeland?

Kadeer:
I think there will be more bloodshed, because the Chinese [authorities] continue to crack down on the people [Uyghurs]. The situation is troublesome; several members of every family are in prison. The Chinese authorities are torturing and killing these people.
I think there will be more bloodshed, because the Chinese [authorities] continue to crack down on the people [Uyghurs]. The situation is troublesome; several members of every family are in prison. The Chinese authorities are torturing and killing these people.


By doing this, the Chinese [regime] is somehow forcing the Uyghur people to choose a more violent way. Therefore, I can't say that this will be always peaceful, but we are pursuing our goal with peaceful means. I've been asking the Chinese authorities not to force the Uyghur people to violence.

RFE/RL: What is the situation on the ground today?

Kadeer:
The situation is deteriorating daily. East Turkistan and the Uyghur territory -- Urumqi and Kashgar -- look like a war zone. The Chinese military, armored vehicles, and tanks are everywhere. They are patrolling the streets. It doesn't look like normal life for the Uyghur people.

In the past, Chinese policy was the systematic assimilation of the people [Uyghurs], but after the July massacre, the policy was to pretty much wipe out the Uyghurs as a people, and the rate of execution is extremely high. Tens of thousands of people have disappeared and many more have been executed. The Uyghurs are at the top of the execution list in China.

Not Separatism, Self-Rule

RFE/RL: The Chinese leaders accuse you of separatism. Are you a separatist?

Kadeer:
If your land is occupied by dictators, and people are massacred, and attempts are made to destroy the national identity of the people, then those who want their property back can't be considered separatists.

Some may think that it is separatism, but I don't call it that. That is the land of the Uyghur people; China occupied that land in 1949. China is an invader. It's not normal when an invading power accuses the people of its occupied land of separatism. If the Uyghurs want to separate from China, even then they shouldn't be considered separatists.

Two Uyghur women pass Chinese troops in Urumqi. Kadeer believes Beijing has no intention of living peacefully with the Uyghurs in China.


RFE/RL: Do you desire separation from China?

Kadeer:
China conferred the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region upon us. They gave us autonomy but laws were never implemented. The Uyghur people were never happy under Chinese rule.
If your land is occupied by dictators, and people are massacred, and attempts are made to destroy the national identity of the people, then those who want their property back can't be considered separatists.


So what we're seeking right now is the right to self-rule and self-determination for the Uyghur people. So we will go forward [in our demands] based on the peaceful response of the Chinese authorities in a dialogue process.

RFE/RL: You've been living in exile for several years. Earlier you mentioned that contacting people on the ground isn't easy, so don't you feel that you are isolated from your people? And in this case, how can you be sure that your demands are relevant to people's needs on the ground?

Kadeer:
There are some people whose demands aren't similar to mine. For example, I prefer to choose a path that can be acceptable to China, has less chance of bloodshed, and will take the people to freedom, because I don't want bloodshed. But some of my people have an absolutely different idea. Even if they don't like my way, due to their respect for me, they are restraining themselves.

RFE/RL: So what is their idea for going forward?

Kadeer:
Their idea is full independence. They say if it causes bloodshed or costs lives, it doesn't matter. But I don't endorse them. So I'm holding back the people's momentum on this issue. I'm proud of my people; I'm grateful to my people for listening to what I'm telling them.

RFE/RL: Do you think the idea of full independence is gathering more momentum among the Uyghurs?

Kadeer:
Yes, the demand for full independence is gathering momentum. If it was at 50 percent before the July 2009 massacre, now it's at 90 percent.

They say we shouldn't forget that we have had established states twice in the past century. They say that throughout history, we have had independent states. My people tell me that the Chinese authorities have no intention of living side by side with Uyghurs in East Turkestan; they haven't done this in the last 60 years.

Even if [the Uyghurs] say that we accept the autonomy status given by the Chinese and we agree to live together, they keep killing us. Therefore, the Uyghurs say, "Ms. Rebiya, you should forget the idea of living together with the Chinese people."

That's why I am calling on all the Uyghur leaders to meet on May 2 to discuss our future path. Among the participants will be Uyghur intellectuals, representatives of Uyghur youth, women, religious figures, heads of NGOs, as well as businessmen and businesswomen. All these individuals who act as representatives will gather and discuss all of these issues.

Too Many Governments-In-Exile

RFE/RL: Was establishing a government-in-exile ever in your agenda? One like the Dalai Lama has for the Tibetan people?

Kadeer:
We will think about it in the future. Actually, we wanted to establish it earlier, but some Chinese agents announced a false government-in-exile. Therefore, they didn't give us a chance to implement our plan. Now there are two governments-in-exile. Actually, this was the work of the Chinese [authorities]. This was a step to prevent us from forming a real government-in-exile.

RFE/RL: Do you plan to put the idea of forming a government-in-exile on the agenda of the upcoming Uyghur congress in May of this year?

Kadeer:
Yes, we will discuss this idea, but we won't form it right away. It may take two or three years to establish it.

RFE/RL: As I understand, for the immediate future you don't favor a struggle for full independence and you also don't seem to be in favor of autonomy. So what is your path for the future of your Uyghur cause?

Kadeer:
If we ask for autonomy, we already have it, although the laws were never implemented. China says, "You've already been granted autonomy." But [on the other hand] they're massacring us. If we call for independence, China will say, "You're separatists," in which case the international community wouldn't intervene, saying, "You're separatists."

Therefore, we ask for self-determination. Our people are ready for dialogue under the autonomy status, which will allow us to determine our future [according to] our people. For example, the Sudanese [government] allowed its people to vote and determine their future. We also want the Xinjiang Autonomous Republic to be given the right to go to referendum, and state what they seek. But the Chinese authorities have already changed the demographics of East Turkestan. They brought millions of Chinese settlers who shouldn't have the right to vote.

What Has China Brought?

RFE/RL: How do you regard those Han Chinese, whom you say were brought by the millions by the Chinese government? Do you consider them colonists or brothers and sisters?

Kadeer:
I see them as colonists, because they didn't come naturally; they were artificially transferred. They destroyed our ecology, they destroyed our trees and environment, they didn't come to live with us in peace, and they came to destroy what we had. On the one hand, they're imposing their dictatorship on us; on the other hand, we're not regarded as equals. We may be able to live together with some of them, but I regard the majority of them as colonists. When the time comes, some of them may leave the region automatically; if some of them decide to stay, we won't oppose them.

RFE/RL: Since the July 2009 bloodshed, the Chinese government says that it has invested millions of dollars into economic developments in your region. Do you see any changes in economic conditions on the ground?

Kadeer:
Yes, since the July 2009 massacre, the Chinese government has invested massively in the region, but at the same time they also transferred millions of Chinese to our land, forcing the Uyghurs to give up their land to [accommodate] the Chinese. Those [Uyghurs] who resisted were put in prisons or driven away. [The Chinese government] builds lots of apartment buildings for the Chinese so that they can have a better life.

RFE/RL: Earlier, you were saying that the people whose property was confiscated include members of your family, brothers, and sons, and some of them are still in jail. If you look back, do you think it was worth it to start this struggle?

Kadeer:
Yes, it was worth it. Tens of thousands of people are put in jail for this cause, so there is no question about its worthiness. [The Uyghur activists] knew that they would be persecuted; despite that, they joined this struggle.

Without a struggle you can't achieve anything -- haven't you seen what happened in Egypt? When the demonstration began in Egypt, there were only a few people. They probably didn't think that their struggle would lead to such a big achievement. Look at the situation in Tunisia; in the end, it was realized that it was worthwhile.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Sergey from: Chicago, USA
February 27, 2011 17:00
She's clearly a Uyghur Jihadist. I am not a fan of Chinese Communist thuggery, but I don't want parts of China to be taken over by Jihadist rule either. China is not going to let Uyghur Jihadis to pull off something like Islamic revolution. They going to crush it mercilessly and considering what happens when Islamists take over, outside of Islamic world, Uyghur JIhadis won't get much help.
In Response

by: mohamed from: paradise
February 28, 2011 11:06
yes, the way she goes on and on about Islam and all, obviously a jihadist...

Sergey, you're a crazy old man obsessing about Muslims in some Chicago suburb, aren't you? Really, you've lost your grip completely. The Chinese are doing to the Uighurs what they're doing to the Tibetans. Pure and simple. Just like with the Russians, communism is just a shield for imperialism.
In Response

by: Sergey from: Chicago
February 28, 2011 16:14
Muhammad, while hundreds of thousands (if not milions) of Muslim terrorists around the world continue waging war against infidels and against each other, it's a perfectly normal reaction of non-Muslims to fear Muslims. Sorry, but even if I wanted to forget that Islam exist, there is a hardly day goes by to remind me of its existence whether in a form terror attacks, in the form of some fatwas against someone Islamic clerics deem deserving to die or in the form Middle East bloody revolutions where it's hardly a cause of celebration to see the old dictators fall because those who come to replace them probably will be much worse.

So don't give me this crap about me being obsessed with Muslims. It's pathologies within Islam that cause so many Muslims to join terror groups and wage Jihad against "infidels","kafirs" and other "Muslims". It's Islamic Terror groups that have a lion share of the world terror attacks around the world. Don't blame me for the problems that exist within Islam since its very beginning. I have every reason and right to fear Islam and to fear those who seek to advance one way or another Islamic agenda down on everyone's throat.
In Response

by: Noah from: US
March 01, 2011 16:04
Less then 0.01% of all Muslim practitioners approve of any radical Islam formation. Your ignorance is laughable, and it clearly reflects that you are from America.
Millions??
Hmm
In Response

by: hugh from: US
March 03, 2011 17:41
In July of last year, the University of Maryland commissioned Zogby to poll the people of Egypt. Here are a few of their findings:
85% of Egyptians hold an unfavorable attitude toward the U.S.
87% of Egyptians have no confidence in the U.S.
92% of Egyptians believe the U.S. is one of two nations that is the greatest threat to them (the other nation the Egyptian people hate is Israel)
52% of Egyptians hold an unfavorable opinion of American people
65% of Egyptians believe that Islamic clergy must play a greater role in the Egyptian political system
79% percent of Egyptians believe that it would be positive if Iran is able to acquire nuclear weapons

The Zogby poll results back up a similar project conducted by Pew in April and May of last year. Among Egyptian Muslims polled, 85% felt that Islam’s role in politics was a positive one. In a struggle between modernizers and Islamist fundamentalists, 59% of Egyptians who foresaw such a conflict stated they would side with the Islamists, while only 27% stated that they would side with the modernizers.

Another Pew poll last June revealed that only 17% of Egyptians hold a favorable view of the United States, while 20% hold a favorable view of suicide bombing. Yes dear readers, Egyptians like suicide bombing more than they like you.

Pew also revealed that 82% of Egyptian Muslims support stoning human beings to death for having sex outside of marriage and that 77% of Egyptian Muslims support public whippings and cutting people’s hands off for theft. In addition, a terrifying 84% of Egyptian Muslims support the death penalty for anyone who has the good sense to leave the religion of Islam.

by: peacefulprotests from: Washington DC
February 27, 2011 17:33
Uyghurs came from Altai mountains in Mongolia. They speak a Turkic/Altaic language. They did not reach the Tarim Basin until 9th century AD. At that time, the Tarim Basin had Indo European language groups. So, the Ugyhurs did not originate from Tarim Basin.
Chinese were in the Tarim Basin since 1st century AD. So China has an older claim to Tarim Basin area.

by: Ray F. from: Lawrence, KS
February 27, 2011 22:35
Don't want to stick up for the Chinese authorities, but in all fairness you should provide some analysis to these charges. I did a brief check on the situation in the region and could find nothing to corroborate charges of severe repression, torture and discrimination. Again, from a non-expert point of view, appears to me that the Chinese authorities are trying to work with Uyghur officials to find a solution.

by: M from: USA/Tajikistan
February 28, 2011 12:01
I have a response for Sergey, 'peacefulprotests,' and Ray:

Sergey: First off, What evidence from what this woman has said has anything to do with this notion of "Jihadism," or Islamism in general? That's right, none! She didn't once mention Islam. She just wants independent rule for her people.

peacefulprotests: What the hell do language families or 2000 year old history have to do with a present struggle for self-determination? I don't care if the Chinese have oppressed Central Asia for 2000 years, it doesn't make it right, nor is it in any way relevant with a present movement for autonomy.

Last, Ray: You may not be able to find anything about repression in the English media (online or no) because the only thing coming out of China on the issue is going to be pro-government. That doesn't change the fact that the Chinese government has marginalized the Uyghur, and many other, minorities.

by: a peaceful person from: a peaceful place
February 28, 2011 19:50
The Uyghurs will struggle peacefully against the Chinese gov,
and for each Uyghur that struggles peacefully,
the Chinese gov will import ten Han families to live in peace,
until there are no Uyghurs left to struggle at all.

It's so peaceful.

by: Joseph from: London
March 01, 2011 15:22
Oh boy Sergei, you are an ignorant man, look at yourself, what she is saying and how you are interpreting it.

She says, if bloody repression of China continues, she doesn’t think people always remain peaceful, and SHE IS RIGHT. She adds despite the Chiniese agression, she is the one who is trying to prevent it from happening, because she clearly indicates, that she disaproves bloodshed.

As of interview, although I follow minority issues in many countries, and I am also aware what the Chinese authorities call Uyghurs, but I never knew what the Uyghur's prospective of the issue, thanks for RFE/RL for this excellent piece.

by: Artish from: USA
March 13, 2011 13:54
The statement made by Kadeer about the East Turkistan Government in Exile is ridiculous and fabrication. She said that the previously announced government in exile is the game of China. If she is right about it, then what were her family members doing with the Chinese agents who announced the government in exile in front of the Capitol Hill Washington, D.C., on September 14, 2004? Please, see the official website of the government in exile of East Turkistan by typing: www.eastturkistangovernmentinexile.us and look at the picture taken in front of the U.S. Capitol Hill. Kadeer's daughter Qiqinus is located 1st from right in first row and her husband Sidiq Haji Rozi located in 3rd row, 3rd from left. That is the so called famous Uyghur politician who was born with political brain. I can identify who Kadeer is by giving true information about her if you give me your email address or phone number.

I will tell you the true story of the government in exile...Kadeer is trying to justify her wrong doing by labeling the government in exile of East Turkistan as a Chinese work. It is so obvious from her answers to the journalist that the Uyghur movement under her leadership is totally lost or hijacked by Rebiya Kadeer and her followers.

Many people believe that Kadeer is the product of Communist China. What she does is more beneficial to Communist China than to her Uyghur people. Because, she promotes autonomy instead of independence for the Uyghur people like the Chinese does. She terrorize her own people if they disagree with her or choose different path from her by calling them as Chinese spies like she called the announcers of the East Turkistan government in exile as the Chinese agents. In short, Kadeer's labeling the previously established East Turkistan Government in exile as the work of China is very similar to that of China's labeling the people of East Turkistan who advocates independence from China as terrorists in order to justify its persecution in East Turkistan.

Therefore, Rabiya Kadeers is not the true leader of the people of East Turkistan. She is the artificial leader made by Communist China in order to destroy the true leaders who are fighting for the real cause-- independence of the people of East Turkistan including the Uyghurs. What she has been saying about the treatment of the Uyghurs under the Chinese rule--the Chinese human rights violation against Uyghurs is true. But, she is lying about what the Uyghur people really want in order to not to upset her boss. A real freedom fighter or a real leader should not lie under any condition. She is fooling herself by trying to fool the international community about the aspiration of the Uyghurs for her own desire---Noble Peace Prize maybe…Actually, she can still be rewarded by the Noble or even higher prize without lying. We have been calling her to follow the right path but she is not listening…

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (5 total)

M: Ingush human rights defender Magomed Khazbiev: "Kremlin needs slaves in the Caucasus":
http://pik.tv/ru/shows/vasha-pravda/video/86/4437 More

Kingsley As Karzai?

Latest Comment (1 total)

M: they put the dictators in power and they make fun of them More

Moldova Sentences 3 On Uranium Charge

Latest Comment (1 total)

Ionas Aurelian Rus:
One should not only salute the capture of these officials by the Moldovan ... More