Wednesday, September 03, 2014


Iran's Parliament Questions A Dismissive Ahmadinejad

Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad appears before parliament in Tehran on March 14. Was it a blow to his prestige, or did he emerge on top?
Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad appears before parliament in Tehran on March 14. Was it a blow to his prestige, or did he emerge on top?
Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad has defended his leadership style in the first appearance by an Iranian president before parliament since the Islamic republic was founded in 1979.

Ahmadinejad was summoned on March 14 by lawmakers who are dissatisfied over his handling of the economy and political management.

Ahmadinejad, whose speech to the chamber was broadcast on state media, told legislators that if his government were judged to be "less than 100 percent, it would be unfair and cowardice."

The defiant Iranian president was asked 10 questions that were read out by one of his staunchest critics, lawmaker Ali Motahari. He responded dismissively and, at times, made jokes.

Some of the questions focused on his differences with Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei -- who has ultimate power in the Islamic republic. Ahmadinejad was asked about his refusal last year, for 11 days, to give in to a demand by Khamenei that he reinstate his fired intelligence minister.

He was also questioned about his 2010 dismissal of an ally of Khamenei, former Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki, who was dismissed during a trip to Senegal. Ahmadinejad denied challenging the supreme leader and said as the president he had the right to dismiss ministers.

Ridiculing Parliament

The president deflected other questions from lawmakers who challenged him about Iran's high inflation rate, suggesting it was a result of his policies to reduce Iran's subsidies.

In tongue-in-cheek responses, Ahmadinejad denied any wrongdoing and said that price hikes had nothing to do with slashing subsidies.

He told his questioners that he had responded to their "school exam" questions fully and that if they had consulted with him, they could have come up with better questions.

Some lawmakers said Ahmadinejad had not taken the session seriously and had been disrespectful.

"The president's language was insulting during his entire speech," lawmaker Mostafa Reza Hosseini said. "He escaped answering the questions. As predicted, we did not receive any logical answers from the president."

Did Ahmadinejad Win?

That the session was held at all was seen as a blow to Ahmadinejad's standing, which already has been weakened by a power struggle with Khamenei.

But some analysts have suggested the combative president had the upper hand in the session.

"Ahmadinejad managed to diminish the importance of the questions; some of them were from a few years ago, the public is not interested in them,"  London-based political analyst Asghar Ramezanpour told RFE/RL's Radio Farda.

"Ahmadinejad and his government have pursued a policy of gradually weakening the parliament and it seems that it [the government] has also been supported by Khamenei, because it seems he wanted Ahmadinejad to be questioned at a time when it has the least impact."

In fact, lawmakers have been threatening for the past year to summon Ahmadinejad to the parliament for questioning. Only in February did enough sign the petition necessary to summon him.

Eleven lawmakers subsequently withdrew with their signatures, leading to speculation that the motion would be canceled. But the parliament's presiding board ruled on March 13 that the questioning should go ahead.

While Ahmadinejad was being questioned, clashes between his supporters and opponents were reported outside the parliament.

The semi-official ILNA news agency reported that the police intervened to stop the scuffle.

Written by Golnaz Esfandiari, with contribution by RFE/RL Radio Farda broadcaster Babak Ghafouri
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
by: Eugenio from: Vienna
March 15, 2012 08:54
It's interesting how RFE/RL does not find it too smart to condtradict its own "information": On the one hand, the web-site always goes out of its way to present Iran as a "totalitarian dictatorship". On the other, it publishes this kind of articles that after all show one single thing: the debates in the Iranian parliament - PUBLICLY broadcast by the Iranian tv (which the article itself mentions) - are nothing other than an indication of the fact that THERE IS multiparty democracy in the Islamic Republic. After all, how does this questioning of the Pres. Ahmadinejad differ from the regular parliamentary questioning and mockery that one regularly sees (on BBC) in, for example, the British parliament between the British PM and members of the parliament?
In Response

by: Jack from: US
March 15, 2012 14:17
true. And RFE/RL never reports on human rights abuses in US-supported dictatorships of Bahrein, Saudi Arabia, rump "republic of Georgia", Kosovo, Qatar, Jordan, and now "democratic" Lybia. However RFE/RL goes out of its way to portray Russia or Iran as dictatorships. RFE/RL does not have any credibility or honesty
In Response

by: Eugenio from: Vienna
March 15, 2012 17:37
Exactly, Jack!
In Response

by: Idrian from: Surrey
March 17, 2012 22:52
For that, you have to look at the "progressive" news sites, which probably don't report on the Russian and Iranian dictatorships either.
In Response

by: Idrian from: Surrey
March 17, 2012 22:51
Because it is a "multiparty democracy" within an "Islamic Republic"!

Most Popular