Saturday, May 26, 2012


News

Americans Convicted Of Spying In Iran Say They Were 'Hostages'

TEXT SIZE - +
By RFE/RL
Two Americans held in Tehran since 2009 on spying charges have arrived in the United States with sharp criticism of Iran, saying they were detained because of their nationality, not their actions.

Josh Fattal and Shane Bauer returned to the United States on September 25 following their release on September 21 on $1 million bail.

Fattal and Bauer were arrested with their friend Sarah Shourd along the Iraq-Iran border in July 2009. Shourd had been released on $500,000 bail a year ago.

Last month, Fattal and Bauer were sentenced to eight years in prison after a trial held behind closed doors in Tehran. Washington denies the group were spies and U.S. President Barack Obama has said they should never have been detained.

Speaking at a press conference in New York on September 25, Fattal told reporters the case against them was a complete fabrication by the Iranian regime.

"It was clear to us from the very beginning that we were hostages," Fattal said. "'Hostage' is the most accurate term because, despite certain knowledge of our innocence, the Iranian government has tied our case to its political disputes with the U.S."

'Total Sham'

Bauer said no evidence against them was ever produced in court, and that the only explanation for their prolonged detention was "32 years of mutual hostility between America and Iran."

"The two court sessions we attended were a total sham. They were made up of ridiculous lies that depicted us as being involved in an elaborate American-Israeli conspiracy to undermine Iran," Bauer said. "Sarah, Josh, and I have experienced a taste of the Iranian regime's brutality."

Bauer and Fattal at the first session of their trial in Tehran on February 6.
Iran charged the three with espionage and illegally entering Iran. Bauer and Fattal say they were hiking in the border region between Iraq and Iran and were detained by an Iranian soldier who had beckoned them to come closer. Bauer says they still don't know if they actually crossed the unmarked border on their own or were taken into Iran from Iraqi territory by the Iranian soldier.

"But we would like to be very clear," Bauer said. "This was never about crossing the unmarked border between Iran and Iraq. We were held because of our nationality."

Bauer and Fattal's release coincided with Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad's visit to New York for the UN General Assembly. Ahmadinejad, at odds with Washington and other Western governments over Iran's nuclear program, described the release as a humanitarian gesture.

But Fattal says there was nothing humanitarian about the way he or other prisoners were treated at Tehran's Evin prison.

"We had to go on hunger strike repeatedly just to receive letters from our loved ones," Fattal said. "Many times -- too many times -- we heard the screams of other prisoners being beaten and there was nothing we could do to help them."

'No Justification'

The men spent the first three months of their detention in solitary confinement before they were put in a 2.5-meter by 4-meter cell together. They say they spent their time reading and testing each other on various topics and were allowed a short time in an outside room to exercise daily.

Fattal said that during 781 days in jail, they had a total of 15 minutes of phone calls with their families and one short visit from their mothers.

"We applaud the Iranian authorities for finally making the right decision regarding our case," Fattal said. "But we want to be clear that they do not deserve undue credit for ending what they had no right and no justification to start in the first place."

Bauer said whenever they complained about their treatment, the guards would remind them of conditions at secret CIA prisons and at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where terrorism suspects are held.

Bauer said human rights violations at Guantanamo Bay do not for a moment justify the treatment that he, Fattal, and Shourd received from Iranian authorities.  

written by Ron Synovitz, with agency reports
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: dave from: cs
September 26, 2011 04:26
I don't condone Iran's actions in any way, but I don't have a lot of sympahy for these hikers either. They had to have known that they were dangerously close to violating Iran's borders. They should be thankful they were freed and leave it at that. Their actions potentially hindered our efforts to stop Iran from manufacturing a nuclear weapon. I know I wouldn't have engaged in this risky behaviour.

by: Winston from: Canada
September 26, 2011 04:34
Left wing hacks... I don't understand why they were released. The Iranian gov't should have kept them there forever.
In Response

by: Muslim
September 27, 2011 00:23
Persians realized that these three will soon hike in Afghanistan or Pakistan tribal areas.

by: James from: US
September 26, 2011 09:50
Hiking in war torn Iraq, a quasi-failed state where Americans are hunted on daily basis?? Iraqi Kurdish zone on the boarder with Iraq is a regualr clash point between US backed PJAK terror group and Iranian army. What a normal person would go hiking there? The Western media never even takes a look at this angle of the story. What a primitive people would buy this cover up story?

The part ""Many times -- too many times -- we heard the screams of other prisoners being beaten and there was nothing we could do to help them." sounds a lot like a state department drafted script to once more demonize Iran. This theater is for a domestic US audience, I doubt European and Muslim audience give their claims much credibility.

by: Barbara from: Germany
September 27, 2011 06:55
While there does remain real questions as to why these people would indeed be hiking in such an area. the comments so far mainly reflect the deep suspicions between peoples. If this fundamental question was honestly answered it would go a way to ending the suspicions.

by: Ahmed from: Middle East
September 27, 2011 07:50

Their lawyer said that they were not mistreated - http://www.presstv.ir/detail/201344.html

If they were, they would have announced it during the trial in order to attract international attention and stronger condemnation of Iran. It all sounds like these "hikers"/recon unit was badly trained.

This all is another cheap propaganda stunt we see since day one of the Islamic Revolution.

by: Alidad from: Madrid
September 27, 2011 10:54
Can we end this rather idiotic story now? The great majority of readers' comments (see Yahoo news entries for Iran) show that people were not interested in this news item - very few have expressed sympathy for the three idiots hiking in Iraq of all places; one suspected in any case that sooner or later, they would be released, a deal would be made etc.. It is part of the repetitive theatre of "diplomatic" incidents with Iran or involving the US. This is a typical example of a non-event being puffed up because journalists feel obliged to rustle up a piece of news or "analysis" every day. The underlying, and erroneous assumption in this case is that there would be greater "concern" because some Americans were involved!

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Kingsley As Karzai?

Latest Comment (1 total)

M: they put the dictators in power and they make fun of them More

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (3 total)

M: No, Chechens are not Tatars, and judging by how they wipe out Russian ... More

Moldova Sentences 3 On Uranium Charge

Latest Comment (1 total)

Ionas Aurelian Rus:
One should not only salute the capture of these officials by the Moldovan ... More