Saturday, May 26, 2012


Commentary

Mladic's Arrest. Serbia's Gain.

General Ratko Mladic is on his way to The Hague.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Nenad Pejic
Serge Brammertz, the chief prosecutor of The Hague Tribunal, delivered a blunt message during a visit to Belgrade earlier this month: Further delays in apprehending General Ratko Mladic, the Bosnian Serb wartime military commander who has been indicted for genocide, would not be tolerated.

“Mladic is in Serbia,” Brammertz said. “I expect his capture."

Brammertz added that Serbia's bid to become a candidate to join the European Union "could not be granted" until Mladic was arrested and extradited to The Hague.

This was a very strong statement, and I assume it was followed up with evidence about where Mladic was hiding and under what alias.

Belgrade thus found itself with a clear choice: Arrest and extradite Mladic or give up its ambitions to join the EU.

In the end, they made the right choice. Mladic is finally on his way to The Hague tribunal to answer for his crimes.

And Serbian President Boris Tadic now stands to reap several benefits.

Most importantly, Serbia is likely to be approved as a candidate for EU membership. Brussels has already indicated that this could happen very soon.

Serbia's bargaining position vis-a-vis Kosovo will also become stronger and the international community could become more receptive to Belgrade's concerns there.

Moreover, the International Monetary Fund and other financial institutions will now be more willing to assist Serbia in the current financial crisis.

Serbia’s standing in the Balkan region should also improve as a result of Mladic's arrest. This will help to end the long chapter of conflict in the region and help all sides to move toward reconciliation.

Tadic might not became the regional leader he hopes to be, but his chances now are better than ever.

If he continues with the process of “de-Milosevicisation," if the media start reporting honestly about the war's real causes, if those responsible are truly held to account, Serbia might even become a regional leader.

The one player in the region who stands to lose from Mladic's arrest is Republika Srpska President Milorad Dodik. The leader of the Bosnian Serb entity has positioned himself as the leader of hard-line Serbs throughout the region.

Domestically, Tadic should win back the support of disappointed members of his Democratic Party and others who supported him but were frustrated with the slow pace of his reforms. Those who nicknamed the president an “attractive Ken doll” and derided his weakness and unwillingness to make tough decisions will now need to temper their cynicism.

Tadic has demonstrated that he does, indeed, know how to be a statesman. If he is also an attractive and charming statesman, all the better.

He will probably face some demonstrations in Serbia from hard-liners. A poll just two weeks ago showed that 70 percent of Serbs would not report Mladic to the police if they knew where he was hiding.

It is unclear, however, whether this necessarily means people will be willing to take to the streets in protest. The nationalist opposition, in any case, appears incapable of mounting any massive street demonstrations of any consequence.

Tadic calculated very well.

In his press conference announcing the arrest, Tadic said it was about the “moral dignity of our country and our people.” He is right. I do know lot of Serbs who were ashamed of what Mladic did and who have been long awaiting his arrest.

They can relax now. And move forward.

Nenad Pejic is an associate director of broadcasting at RFE/RL. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Ivan from: Sofia
May 26, 2011 18:59
The Bosnian Muslims committed no smaller crimes, yet the Serbs are the ones who are blamed for all the atrocities. History, as usual, is written by the winners, and in this case the winner is NATO. Those trials in the Hague are but a perversion of justice.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
May 27, 2011 10:29
You are pathetic and pitiful in your defense of the greatest war criminal of our times.
I remember that at sometime you said to the Balkan Muslims that the war was not yet over. Don't you wish for a rematch. For next time around it will not be the Muslims who will get the wrong end of the stick.
In Response

by: Rasto from: London
May 27, 2011 12:43
Ivan, learning about Bulgarian history I appreciate your sympathy towards Slavic brothers, however, in your comment it is not well expressed. Truth is that no way that level crimes as commited by Mladic and Karadzic and other Serbs were commited by Bosniak Muslim warlords such as Naser Oric. Even if were, that makes no justification.
In Response

by: Salva
May 27, 2011 13:07
If the Serbs were so evil in comparison to the Craots, Bosniaks and Albanians, there would be no need to lie by grossly exagerrating death and rape figures - especially on the latter.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
May 27, 2011 21:22
Slava these are not lies. The rapes are fact. Nobody is demonizing the Serbs, they did a very good job at it themselves. Karadzic said the Bosniaks would "disappear from the Earth" That was no rhetoric threat, that was his intention all along; and all denial and belittling by people like you does the rest; and having said that this afternoon I have met a very nice guy originally from Belgrade, and his wife from Banja Luka and they are deeply ashamed by all that. They don't hate Muslims. They're good people. I'm delighted to be their friend. If only there were more like that about.
It is quite obvious you don't know nothing about Bosniaks. How 'bout going out and educating yourself?
In Response

by: Slava
May 28, 2011 17:10
The stated rape clims by some Bosniak nationalist are lies. Figures like 80,000 downed to considerably less haven't been substantiated because they're bogus.

Meantime, it's not as if the other sides didn't rape. In any event, the stated instances were grossly exagerrated.

In Response

by: Slava
May 28, 2011 17:12
Excellent piece in contrast to much of the RFE/RL articles on the subject:

http://www.electricpolitics.com/2011/05/a_bosnian_war_story.html

by: Slava
May 27, 2011 04:24
The neocon/neolib influenced Evil Empire will have other excuses to continuously apply hypocritical standards towards Serbia.

So much for the garbage put out by Quisling Serbs, employed by propaganda organs like RFE/RL.
In Response

by: NoPartitionOfBosnia
May 27, 2011 10:34
The garbage is in your head buddy. It is called Serb ultranationalism or serbofascism.
In Response

by: Salva
May 27, 2011 13:05
More like anti-Serb bigotry on your part.
In Response

by: lavas
May 29, 2011 10:19
More like stonewall denialism on your part. Also, just because rape figures were "exaggerated" as you put it, doesn't mean they're bogus. There have been convictions in The Hague on mass-rape charges, which is lot more sunstantiated than your constant wails of "bias" and "anti-Serb bigotry."
In Response

by: Slava
May 29, 2011 13:16
Why blatantly lie in the first plce on the actual numbers, inclusive of the lie denying rapes against Serbs?

The ICTY is a kangaroo court miockery of justice.

by: Abdulmajid
May 27, 2011 08:27
The Butcher of Bosnia is utterly inhuman, right up there with Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot; and anyone who defends him is just as inhuman.
The comments by the serbofascists above only show their true inhuman and monstrous nature. I see every one of them would be as ready and delighted as Ratko Mladic himself to waste people just because they're Muslims .
And they are pathetic. Their so-called hero hid himself away like the coward he is. And Serbia delivered him , like it did with Karadzic becaquse it exdpected a political reward. At least Naser Oric and Rasim Delic who are re4gulkarlys demonized by teh serbofascists had teh decency to surrender voluntarily to The Hague. And whatever they many have done or ordered done to Serbs has no comparison to what Mladic and Karadzic did. The continued babbling "Ejup Ganic, Ilija Jurisic and Jovan Divjak" are war criminals only shows how obtuse and stupid these serbofascists really are. Even the Serbs themselves had to Let Jurisic go! But teh serbofascists keep blabbing about themandsmearing them as war criminals and trying to place teh blame for teh war on teh Bosniaks. Diabolic you are and diabolic you will always bew Dear Serbofascists. But you will not win in the end: Bosniaks and Bosnia will prevail!
And show me the nameo f one single Muslim commander who dia an atroocity as large and as bad as those of Ratko Mladic! But you can't because even at the Cele Kula there are only hundred victims, Ratko Mladic had over 100 times as many murdered!
If people like you gained control over Serbia then it would have to be carpet-bombed into submissionand get teh same treatment Japan got in 1945 by MacArthur! Maybe then you will leave Bosnia in peace! Fortunately for the whole region, only a handful of retrograde serbofascist ultranationalists turned out in support of Mladic, and not the masses because the days of ultranationalism and Graeter Serb chauvinism are numbered! But one thing is certain: You Serbs will NEVER destroy Bosnia and the Bosniaks! All those who support "repluka srpska" are in for a nasty surprise.
And don't try to peddle teh serbofascist standpoint to me that Serbs were in Bosnia first and have allthe rights, and the balije none. First, I know you have made up your minds about the Bosniaks since 1804 and you want to continue Ratko Mladic's "job": And second I am Muslim. I have been watching you Serbs for over 20 years now, I have seen what you did and I have heard what you think, and based on that I too have made up my mind about you. You have passed judgment on Muslims for what their ancestors allegedly did to your ancestors, and tried to execute it many times; I too, and many of my brethren have passed judgment on the Serbs. The day to execute it will come.

by: Abdulmajid
May 27, 2011 19:32
What I'm trying to say is: Bosnia can'T be partitioned. It is older than the ongoing conflict which is not for ethnic reasons but just for personal gain of the aggressor's leaders. If Bonsiaks must acknowledge that Bosnian Serbs are there, then so must the Bonsian Serbs acknowledge that Bosniaks are there. That the Bosniaks were up to establish an Islamic Republic in which Serbs have no rights is just a projection of what the Serbs did with "repluka Srpska" to the Bosniaks who lived there. It is saying "They'll do the same thing to us". It was just a propaganda lie to instill fear of Bosniaks in the hearts of the Serbs and make them rally around their leaders, and to divert their attention so they will not see how they line their pockets.
According to the Qur'an God created mankind into diferent tribes and nations so they would learn to respect each other. So, now that the Butcher of the alkans has been removed from circulation, y'all should finally learn to respect each other. Wars do not make great. The Germans and the Japanese had to realize that. When will you?

by: Abdulmajid
May 27, 2011 21:44
Nenad said: "I do know lot of Serbs who were ashamed of what Mladic did and who have been long awaiting his arrest."
Undoubtedly so. I wish they had made their voices heard earlier, louder and more often.
And so, Serbia will be admited into the EU earlier than Bosnia? And Bosnia has to remain amputated and dysfunctional due to Dodik's doing and then crying out that Bosnia is dysfunctional? The Bosniaks will be short-changed again? Or isn't it rather time that Mladic's, Milosevic's and Karadzic's joint criminal enterprise called "repluka srpska" be dismantled as well? if not, it's like the Americans condemned Tojo in 1945 but let Japan keep Taiwan, Korea and Manchuria? Or if the Allies, after defeating Nazi Germany and after Nuremberg hadn'd dismantled it but let it keep Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland in the bargain.
In Response

by: Slava
May 30, 2011 10:42
Actually Dodik and Bosnia's Croats have moved closer in part because of the overbearing manner of Bosnian Muslim nationalists.

On the subject of Japan in WW II, Hisroshima and Nagaski were a greater slaughter than Srebrenica. The latter area involved atrocities on the part of Bosnian Muslim nationalists, which anti-Serb propagandists disingenuously downplay.

In Response

by: Abdulmajid
May 30, 2011 18:15
Your side has been inflicted another big defeat. And there is nothing you can do about it. Bosnia and the Bosniaks will always be there to spite you. You are pathetic in your anti-Bosniak hate. Sure the Bosniaks killed Serbs. Would you have preferred them to be led like lambs to the slaughter. Undoubtedly you would. The Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto killed some SS men too. Does that make them war criminals? ANd neyt time you try to extterminate teh balije again you will find it much tougher than in 1992 when you had it relatively easy becasue you pounced on an unarmed and utterly defenseless people. Even Ratko himself has acknowledged that his cause is finished, why else would he have told his supporters to stay calm? But he IS a coward, now he says blame milosevic (how convenient that he's dead) and "I didn't vote for him" And you, dear fellow, are hardly better. Your serbofascist ideas are pathetic.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
May 30, 2011 22:41
"On the subject of Japan in WW II, Hisroshima and Nagaski were a greater slaughter than Srebrenica."
That does not exonerate Mladic, his willing executioners, nor any anti-Muslims murderers or Greater Serb apologists. Not one bit.
"The latter area involved atrocities on the part of Bosnian Muslim nationalists, which anti-Serb propagandists disingenuously downplay."
You don't say that out of a desire for reconciliatoin but to rewrite history and tergiverse the truth.
In Response

by: Slava
May 31, 2011 01:13
As your delusional Islamofascist idiocy lingers on.
In Response

by: Abdulmajid
June 01, 2011 18:42
Like I said, since you don't have any plausible arguments to stand on except your Greater Serb chauvinism and xenophobia, you resort to insult and slander.

by: Yugo
June 02, 2011 14:56
We need to look at the bigger picture instead of sounding like a nationalist who is trying to convince everyone that Serbs are ones to blame for the bad things that has happened in Former Yugoslav Replublics. There were alot of speculation from the media during the break up of Yugoslavia which certainly fuelled your as well as the wests biased view against Serbs. Why did the Bosniaks and Croat needed to hire a public relations firm Ruder & Finn to bolster their image as a peoples that were suppresed by the Yugoslav Army? Alija Izetbegovic, during World War 2 had been a member of the Young Muslims, classed as a fundamentalist organiszation that advocated an Islamic Bosnia, who were expecting the axis victory would advance their cause, the Young Muslims actively recruited Muslin units for the SS. Franjo Tudjman, who became president of Croatia appointed former Nazi-collaborating Ustashe leaderst to government post, a man who wrote in his book "Wastelands of Historical Truth" he claimed that "the establishment of Hitler's new European order can be justified by the need to be rid of the Jews" and that only nine hundred thousand jews, not six million, were killed in th Holocaust. These 2 bits of information provides a very interesting insight of what kind of men were praised by the west and yet Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadjic are the war criminals? There is a general understanding on all sides through any conflict will be civilian casualities due to the nature of war. My understanding of Law in many countries is that you are inoccent until proven guilty and due to the amount of media/Nato and other international observers falsifying and misleading reports during the conflict has made these people guilty. Couple of things I do want to add ICTY is not a UN recognised and I am serb who has bosnian muslim and croats as friends and it is only a small amount of people who live in Bosnia and abroad still has the us against them rhetoric.
In Response

by: Slava
June 06, 2011 01:21
The media in Serbia today is noticeably restricted in a way that is agreeable with the standard propaganda evident at RFE/RL

Readers might like to guess which Balkan leaders said or wrote the following

A. "Genocide is a natural phenomenon in keeping with the human-social and mythological divine nature. It is not only commended but commanded by the Almighty..."

B."Protect brotherhood and unity...nationalism always means isolation from others, being locked in a closed circle and stopping growth..."

C."There can be no peace or coexistence between the Islamic faith and non Islamic institutions. The Islamic movement can and must take power as soon as it is morally strong enough, not only to destroy the non Islamic power but to build a new one...."

The answers may surprise.

They are

A. Franjo Tudjman - leader of Croatia

B. Slobodan Milosevic - Serbian leader branded as "the butcher of the Balkans" by EU/NATO

C. Alia Izetbegovic - Muslim leader of Bosnia, backed by EU/NATO

So it is no surprise that things are not quite as portrayed with General Mladic. Atrocities occurred at Srebrenica and elsewhere by all sides, as testified by the Canadian UN Commander, General Lewis Mackenzie. He states that the Muslim forces used the UN "safe haven" at
Srebrenica, as a base for murderous attacks against surrounding Serb villages, in which many civilians were killed.

So when the Bosnian Serb forces arrived in the town, they were not in a forgiving mood and many murders undoubtedly took place but, as for the claim of 8,000 summarily executed - this seems like another trumped up anti-Serb hoax. Neither does anyone committing genocide allowing women and children safe passage -as Mladic's forces did.

Whilst saying that two wrongs don't make a right, General MacKenzie believes that the Serbs were fooled into their attack to provide a
pretext for NATO air strikes.

James Bissett former Canadian Ambassador in Yugoslavia is among other earnest folks in agreement.

The Muslim Commander, General Nasir Oric, got off at the Hague tribunal but I doubt whether General Mladic will.

In Response

by: Yugo
June 07, 2011 14:49
Slava,

My biggest concern is that the media has stopped asking the vital questions and investigate claims from all sides.
Instead it was and now easier to be spoon fed the information by the their governments "they they had all the charts and images of bomb hitting something strategically important" and lets add "100000 people got raped, burned, buried" it sounds really good.
It is unusual when the media is fed this information from their government and not question the information they receive about conflicts but when it comes to internal affairs that affect people they are all over it like a pack of wolves.
I wonder if the western media is really free anymore?

Latest Commentary

No records found for this widget:963

More Commentary

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (5 total)

M: Ingush human rights defender Magomed Khazbiev: "Kremlin needs slaves in the Caucasus":
http://pik.tv/ru/shows/vasha-pravda/video/86/4437 More

Kingsley As Karzai?

Latest Comment (1 total)

M: they put the dictators in power and they make fun of them More

Moldova Sentences 3 On Uranium Charge

Latest Comment (1 total)

Ionas Aurelian Rus:
One should not only salute the capture of these officials by the Moldovan ... More