Saturday, May 18, 2013


Features

Russian Census Results Show Continuing Demographic Crisis

Precious youth: A nurse watches over newborns at a Moscow maternity hospital. (file photo)
Precious youth: A nurse watches over newborns at a Moscow maternity hospital. (file photo)
TEXT SIZE - +
By Robert Coalson
The Russian government this week released the first preliminary results from last year's census, so far confirming a long-running demographic crisis and sparking debate about the latest headcount's accuracy and the government's response.

The initial, bare-bones results contained few surprises, and appear to bear out a UN report that projects a significant depopulation of Russia in the next four decades.

Russia's population dropped by 2.2 million -- or 1.6 percent, to 142.9 million -- since the last census in 2002. A disproportion in favor of women continues to grow as well, with 53.7 percent of the population female.

Aleksandr Surinov, the head of the Rosstat state statistics agency, told "Rossiiskaya gazeta" that the growing gender imbalance is due primarily to "the high incidence of premature death among men."

The census also shows that 73.7 percent of Russians live in urban areas.

Just 20 of the country's 83 regions saw population increases, many of them the so-called ethnic republics.

Raising Questions

Complete final results of the census -- including crucial information on mortality and birthrates -- is expected in early 2013.

In 2009, a UN report forecast that Russia's population would fall to 116 million by 2050.

"The demographic process today -- and I mean the decline in population -- is fantastically powerful, and it is connected not only with the allocation or nonallocation of budget resources, but also with the problem of culture," Mark Urnov, head of the politics department of Moscow's Higher School of Economics, says. "We have become a hedonistic consumer culture and, as is always the case in these situations, the birthrate is in decline. This is also happening in Europe and, to a lesser extent, the United States."

Children play near a local school in the village of Balakhani, Daghestan.



Only a few regions of Russia are bucking the overall downward trend. The prosperous major cities of Moscow and St. Petersburg recorded increases, as did many of the "ethnic republics," particularly in the violence-riddled North Caucasus. The primarily Muslim regions of Chechnya and Daghestan recorded the largest increases.

But Usama Baisayev, an activist in the North Caucasus with the Memorial human rights group, disputes the latest figures. For one thing, he notes that the 2002 census was carried out under difficult conditions in the region and so makes a poor baseline for comparison.

"I remember well how the 2002 census was conducted [in Chechnya] -- in some places, the census takers simply didn't go, particularly in the mountain villages," Baisayev says. "At that time, representatives of the authorities were afraid to show up there because these villages were controlled -- particularly at night -- by Chechen fighters."

In addition, Baisayev says both local authorities in these regions -- which are almost entirely dependent on the budget subsidies from the central government -- and the government in Moscow have strong incentives to inflate their numbers.

"I don't think you can trust the results of this census, because the authorities in Chechnya today believe that the more people there are, the better," Baisayev says. "There are reasons for this connected with the budget, with money. The Russian authorities also don't object to this because human rights organizations are asserting that in Chechnya they are still killing people and producing evidence of this; but if the population figures show more residents of Chechnya, then that would mean the statistics contradict the reports of the activists."

Drains And Holes

The census has once again stirred up discussion of Russia's demographic challenges, with supporters of the ruling tandem of President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin arguing that the birthrate has stabilized following the demographic catastrophe of the 1990s and has even begun rising over the last couple of years. They attribute the uptick to the government's family-promotion policies.

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev meets with a group of mothers of large families on the eve of International Women's Day at the Barvikha presidential residence outside Moscow on March 7.



Other specialists, however, argue that the recent small increases in birthrates are due to the fact that the generation born in the late 1980s is now at its child-bearing peak. As that generation is replaced by the smaller and more traumatized cohort that was born in the 1990s, these specialists expect the birthrate to take another sharp downturn in the coming years.

"The population has increased [in the last few years], but there will be a decrease because those who were born in the 1990s will be having children soon," says Flura Ildarkhanova, the head of a demographic research center of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences in Kazan. "[Then] the population will decrease again and there will be a 'demographic hole.'"

Political scientist Urnov notes that the demographic problem is further exacerbated by out-migration, particularly of educated young people, in what he describes as "the monstrous brain drain, the drain of energetic and enterprising people."

"There was a recent study of the middle class in the regions of [Russia], and it found that those who are oriented toward small or medium-sized business in production prefer to save up some money, pack their bags and go somewhere else. And who remains?"

All of these issues -- low birthrates, rural depopulation, out-migration -- can be coped with, Urnov argues, but doing so will take dedicated effort.

"If we fundamentally -- sharply and deeply -- change our long-term budget policies and bring consistent spending to education, to childcare, to kindergartens, to schools, to culture and if we form a system of values that is oriented toward the long term, maybe something will come of it," Urnov says.

RFE/RL's Russian, Tatar-Bashkir, and North Caucasus services contributed to this report
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Aibek
April 01, 2011 10:34
mne lyiubopytno-- is that picture of the schoolyard in Dagestan the future face of Russia? A rather Caucasian face, framed in a headscarf?
In Response

by: Jorjo from: Florida
April 01, 2011 12:47
Excellent question! I'd like to ask the same and also - when speaking about "Russia" does it include the likes of Ramzan Kadyrov?
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
April 07, 2011 17:13
It means nothing close to what you think, or pretend, Aibek,
"A-i-Bek"? On another hand, it can mean a lot, Aibek and Jorjo.
While Russia and "oboroten's" trying provok something - brake
Through Dagestan, the Russian versus of "little Mukies" snitcheo.

As "little Mukies" were placing little crosses on houses of victims,
They intended to kill and grabb their houses - as Russia excites
Their own Rushkas by possibilitry of annexations and dangers,
By pictures of children, they didn't yet mass-influx like Beslan.

Chechens numbers don't necessary reflect their population -
That hadn't much choice for a number of years have children.


by: John from: Canada
April 02, 2011 06:39
This article is ridden full of ignorance and reeks of outdated russophobic "doomsday" sentiment that has already been debunked in recent years. The population decline is far less than what the UN predicted even two-three years ago. The census shows figures ABOVE what the previous estimates were, those already showing a halt to the decline. All in all, things are actually better than expected.

And those "specialists" you quote must actually be "special" since they fail to note that the TFR (total fertility rate) has risen along with the birth rates, and TFR is completely independent of age ratios.

Not that I'd expect any better from rferl. Same bs as always.
In Response

by: igor from: brooklyn
April 02, 2011 09:32
yes, clearly these Russian academics hate Russia. how dare they question anything about Russia's divine leadership!

</sarcasm>
In Response

by: John from: Canada
April 02, 2011 18:29
This has nothing to do with questioning Russia's leadership. What are you talking about? It's a matter of statistical facts that are being ignored. No objective specialist would overlook a TFR rising by some 30-40% in a decade, nor would they overlook the declining death rates, he massively declining suicide/murder/alcohol poisoning rates etc.
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
April 07, 2011 18:28
Just opposite, Igor and his Bruklin's "polk".
Russian academics plagiarists - but smart,
They help expand your Russian Varaga "volks"
By lying as Solgenitcin's "pure mother Russia" arts.

Maybe John from Canada is right, or maybe even not,
But Russia has two clear paterns - they all spreading,
Through the World, starting with former Imperial hold,
Breeding Moscow Feudals - Demografy missleading.

They also breeding out to extintion non-Russian blend
And better Russians - wich fought and built with USSR
And their republics in 1930-th - 40-th - to dispoossess,
Along with former Russian serfs - as during their Zcars.

Some went "daleche" anothers already "inyh uzh i net",
While Russian nazi contingency expands, since 1954.
Russia's divine leadership? How he will acheive that?
Stink "Cheremushka" at devine nations, as "Igor's-hor"
Tripple-taxed Ukraine - to plagiarize and debase best?

Forgot 1968-69 divine ultimatum - Russia be sterilized,
Example in Petrozavodsk, Karelia's Russian occupiers,
Sterilized for number of years? Return, Russia, grabbed
Land and property, pay for crimes and change your ways.

God did not yet start to make good on his ultimatum, Igor,
However, don't try his patients. And return all priorities too,
Russia, to me and to others, stop bribe USA, plagio-"vors",
And make them return it too, don't bet on craizy Vanda boo.
In Response

by: Anonymous from: USA
April 03, 2011 05:33
@ John
Apparently the Russian government must also be Russophobic because they have admitted there is a demographic problem! It is no secret that Russians live life in a reckless and self-destructive fashion, especially Russian men. The current male lifespan over there is 61-62 yrs of age. Compare that to the retirement age hear in the US at 65 which was implemented in the 1930's. Russia also has had a brain drain since 1991, and your country...Canada...has received many Russian immigrants.
In Response

by: John from: Canada
April 05, 2011 06:47
I never claimed there was no demographic problem. Way to completely miss the point of my post.
In Response

by: Thomas from: Vancouver
April 05, 2011 19:19
Sure, Russophobia is so outdated...
And of course RFE/RL is "ignorant", after all they are an American propagandist institution trying to undermine the glorious Russian nation with damn lies!
Side note, why don't you live in Russia? You seem to like it so much after all.
In Response

by: John from: Canada
April 06, 2011 21:26
Oh look, someone else is ignoring all those inconvenient facts and arguing a strawman completely unrelated to the subject matter. Seems like a pretty common theme here.

I don't live in Russia because Canada is my home. What does my argument about demographics have to do with where I live or why? Who said I even like Russia?
In Response

by: Anonymous from: USA
April 07, 2011 03:04
@ John
It is true that the population figures from the Russian census are above what the UN predicted. The question is, how can the figures be trusted to be authentic? If you were a true Russia-watcher, you would understand that the Russian census was full of errors and corruption. I would not be surprised if the figures were manipulated to make certain ethic groups look smaller or larger. The overall census can also be manipulated to make the population look larger than it really is. The Soviets had a tradition of doing that!
In Response

by: John from: Canada
April 07, 2011 19:59
Show me a census in any country that's gone off without any problems in the past 50 years. Doesn't exist, sorry. We have to take these figures for their face value because that's all we have to go by. Every other estimate from Rosstat to the UN is based off census figures. If you trust their month to month estimates, or UN figures, these census figures cannot logically be considered less reliable.

As far as manipulation goes, there's no basis to your skepticism. Manipulating demographic figures becomes abundantly obvious when things stop adding up, and all it takes is one fudged number to throw everything out of alignment. The Soviets had a different way to deal with undesirable statistics. For example when mortality rates began to rise in the 60s and 70s, instead of lying they simply stopped reporting mortality figures.

Moreover, why would they start manipulating figures now after already acknowledging the problem for the past decade? Like I said, there's no logical basis for your skepticism. Just more run of the mill "durrr Russian government must be lying because the sky isn't actually falling" line of thinking that isn't helpful for anyone.

Most Popular