Saturday, May 26, 2012


Russia

Russia: New Book Explores Consequences Of Hiding From History

"In Russia, the idea that tragic history can be absorbed and made part of the national consciousness has not been acknowledged," writes author David Satter.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Richard Solash
Dusty and streaked with dirt, an enormous bust of Vladimir Lenin, finished only from the nose up, sits in a desolate courtyard. Its eyes seem to have risen from the ground itself, peering at all who pass by.

Taken in 1992, just months after the collapse of the Soviet Union, this is the photograph that appears on the cover of the latest book by veteran U.S. journalist and Russia-watcher David Satter.

The choice is fitting, for the main argument of "It Was a Long Time Ago, and It Never Happened Anyway" is that Russia today is haunted by the specter of unfinished Soviet business -- or rather, unfinished emotional processing, on both the level of the state and in the Russian psyche, of the great human tragedy of the Soviet Union.

Satter writes, "In Russia, the idea that tragic history can be absorbed and made part of the national consciousness has not been acknowledged."

THE FALL: 20 Years After The Collapse Of The U.S.S.R.

Moreover, he argues, the failure to fully acknowledge the root of communism’s crimes -- the idea that individuals are inconsequential in the state's pursuit of its goals -- has allowed the same dynamic to take hold in Vladimir Putin's Russia.

"I think it would take a psychological change in Russia. I think it would take a change in mentality. I think it would take a commitment on the part of people in Russia to defend the integrity of the individual," Satter says. "That commitment isn't there. It's not that Russians don't value their own lives or value the lives of those who are close to them, but they're too willing to write off the deaths, for example, of hostages in hostage situations, the deaths of Russian soldiers from hazing or in training exercises, the deaths in hospitals from mistakes or incompetence, deaths from accidents, suicides, murders. It's a society that doesn't do enough to protect life and protect individuals."

Lost In The Cityscape

Satter argues that the foundation of that attitude was laid in tsarist times and solidified during the unprecedented brutality of the communist period. He writes that the "lack of will to understand the moral significance of what took place" has only deepened that mindset.

x
​​The memorials that do exist to some of the estimated 20 million who died at the hands of the Soviet regime were mostly created during perestroika and are often lost in the cityscape. The Solovetsky Stone, a boulder from the site of the first Soviet camps for political prisoners, sits today in Moscow's Lyubyanskaya Square, the home of the former KGB, but is overshadowed by the buildings it is meant to decry.

There is neither a national monument nor a national museum to the victims of the communist terror, Satter notes. And more importantly, there is no national anger about it.

Along with examples from across the country, Satter’s book memorializes in writing some of the hundreds of sites throughout Moscow that remain without plaques or statues -- the sites of KGB murders and executions that he says have been too easily resigned to history.

The building at 23 Nikolskaya Street in the capital, where 35,000 people were sentenced to death, will soon become part of an entertainment complex.

"The feeling of revulsion or horror at the actions of the regime is largely absent today," the author says, adding that "the sites of mass killings are either noted in a haphazard way or not at all."

"As I mention in the book, if you walk down Bolshaya Dzerzhinskaya Street, past the building on the corner of Varsonofevsky Lane, you see a kind of unwashed, three-story building [with] no indication that there were mass executions carried out there," Satter says. "And there are many other such examples."

'Ship Of Death'

That building, called the "ship of death" by the Muscovites who know its story, lies just steps away from a restaurant called The Shield and Sword, an establishment that celebrates the dreaded security services. Satter recalls a conversation with the restaurant's manager that captured the forgiving attitude of many Russians.

A city bus is decorated with a portrait of Josef Stalin on a street in St. Petersburg. (file photo)
​​"If you entered the restaurant, the first thing you saw was a white bust of [former KGB chief and Communist Party General Secretary Yury] Andropov festooned with flowers and then statues and portraits of all of the former leaders of the state security, including the most bloodthirsty and the most criminal -- [chiefs of the Soviet secret police Lavrenty] Beria, [and Nikolai] Yezhov," Satter says.

"I went there and I talked to the manager and I asked him if he had any qualms about putting up these portraits, and he gave a reply that's actually quite typical of a certain segment of Russian opinion. He said, 'You can't judge what happened by the standards of today. It was a different historical situation [and] different requirements.'"

The wave of anticommunist sentiment that followed the fall of the Soviet Union was essentially squashed in 2005, Satter argues, when then-President Vladimir Putin infamously declared that the breakup was "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century."

Weight Of The Past

Satter says the failure of Russians to judge the communist era in moral terms fits well into Putin’s designs.

Memorializing these crimes has been discouraged and the celebration of the past has been promoted, he says. Former Moscow Mayor Yury Luzkhov famously advocated returning a statue of the first Soviet secret police director, Feliks Dzerzhinsky, to central Moscow, where it had stood until the 1991 coup. In recent years, the city of Orel has approved rehabilitating statues of Stalin.

As time passes, Russians will find it even harder to feel the weight of their past, Satter says.

"If there's little incentive now to go to the trouble of marking the burial sites, of commemorating the victims, of in fact passing judgment on the persecutors, how much less interest will there be in five, 10, 15 years, where the rush of events will have put it even further in the past?" he asks.

"It Was a Long Time Ago, and It Never Happened Anyway" will be published in the United States on December 13. Russian and Ukrainian versions are also being planned.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Ivan the terrible from: Here, there &everywhere
December 08, 2011 14:53
The roots of `communism` and its twin sister-national socialism lie in good old capitalism.People are different and you cant force the russians to accept your view of history.and people in Russia are going back to your good old uncle Joe because of the west`s egomaniacal interests,siding with former `communist` and `komsomol` leaders turning overnite capitalists in plundering the national resources and the economy.The Soros type molochs can only bring people back to Lenin and Stalin.The oh,so demockratic west has failed in its attitude towards Russia and its satellites and must bear its own responsibility ,but its easier and more convenient to blame the russians instead.
In Response

by: Georgia from: United States
December 08, 2011 22:13
Ivan, your post makes exactly the case that Sutter makes: you are not addressing the issue under discussion. Instead of reflecting on the crimes of communism, which is what the books is about, you throw hard words in the direction of "the West" for imposing democracy on Russia; for "blaming the Russians", etc. Suppose that your ancestors, say your great-grand father was one of those tortured, imprisoned without trial, executed and thrown into a dumpster by the communist regime, would you still be so defensive and ready to blame "the West"? Would you still not want to know on what historical foundation you are building your own life? Coping with history is not easy, I am from Romania and the same happens there.
In Response

by: Ivan the terrible from: Anywhere
December 09, 2011 11:46
Dear romanian George Zamfir,I agree 100% with Satter,it is a fair article for a daily paper journalist who will not dig deeper to find the cause and the historical roots / foundations as you say/for people`s reactions towards the wild westernization of their countries.My great grand father and more than 40 members of his family were killed in an ethnic cleansing which is denied ,for a century now by its perpetrators who got billions of $$$$ from the USA and the demockratic west,which is supposedly fighting genocide ,ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and helping wild turkey to `drawn the kurds in their own blood`-the quote comes from the prime minister of that territory playing the game of a moderate islamist.My father has been in a `communist` jail and I also have a first hand experience of the regime.I and my family have listened to rfe/rl broadcasts for more than 60 years now and now the rights for its frequencies were sold thru fraud to a former communist secret service stooge turned millionaire by a Soros stooge liberal for a hefty payola.I have been listening for years to the rfe/rl broadcasts to Romania as the local broadcasts here were heavily jammed and the great Kornel Kiriac and Radu Teodor were an every day presence in my home.The west is not promoting democracy here-it is promoting Soros type sharks and doing very good business with the local former `communist` mafia who run the country-same thing happening in former USSR pampers states.I know very well the historical foundation I am trying to build my own life upon- sorry to say I cannot make my own choice...others are doing that and forcing it upon me.Before the historical foundation there is an economic one which forms the historic one and it has no morals whatsoever which makes Satter`s suggestions irrelevant.
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
December 17, 2011 21:57
Humans are part of animal world, they eat,
Often each-other, grabbing land and houses,
And since first known religion they compete:
"Our God, or Ideology, is better than yours".

What is your "beef", Ivan? Isn't it that your probable bosses, imperial resurectors, might
permite you to stash this reply, as somebody
did 2-3 days ago to my comment, while your lies will stand here forever?

Varanga invaded Russia in 9 Century A.D. with total genocide, leaving as slaves only some of children of gang-raped Russian women.
Blaiming non-Russian nations instead?

There is no ideology that can controll
animals - only checks and ballances
(even that cannot help creative, better people).

Socialism is another side of Capitalism.
Both same - except they would like to pay less to another "class" in the production process,
or pay nothing at all.

However, as being animals, they both torture, plagiarize and steal priorities and royalties
from the better people, while accusing
"opposite Ideology", competing to eat each other and for the time being they both eat
the better and the more creative.

Stalin ended genocide during Lenin, offering Common Wealth of Independent States and democratic elections.
He didn't do anything wrong and had only advising power intellectually over the semiliterate and mediocre Russian government leaders.

CIS need not your "Lenin and Stalin", Ivan, but for different reasons you mentioned:

Varanga Russia lies that Stalin was a Tyran (instead of him defending CIS nations they lie he was expanding Russia) - thus they want a "Tyran that would expand Russia".
We don't want a Tyran that expands Russia,
smart Ivan!

Soros is "Moloch"?
Because he helped non-Russian nations, victims of Russian expansion, Ivan?
We want Civilized World, including Soros,
help victims of Russia, smart Ivan!

by: Mamuka
December 08, 2011 16:33
It is not only Russia, but all the former republics (with the possible exception of the Baltics) that suffer from this backward myopia. Even Georgia, which makes the greatest effort toward throwing off its Soviet (and Imperial) past, shows lingering effects of the USSR. They speak of democracy and progress, but often when some difficulty is encountered, they reach into the old Soviet toolkit.

by: Brazilian Man from: São Paulo - SP - Brazil
December 09, 2011 00:15
The fact is that there are more Russians that revere Ivan The Terrible, Lenin, Dzerzhinsky and Stalin than Russians that have positive views about people like Kerensky, Khrushchev or Gorbachev, which are seen as “traitors of the Motherland” or merely “weaklings”.
In Response

by: Ivan the Terrible from: Brazilian jungle
December 09, 2011 12:04
Dear man Brazil,Kerensky, Lenin,Stalin,Dzerzhinsky,Krushchev were not Russians.About your favorites: Kerensky`s traitorous role as villain bringing down Czarist Russia can be traced to his racial background and is not disputed by any historian today.Krushchev was no better villain than his grand master whom he served faithfully for decades and who is in blood up to his ears-In Ukraine and Russia now he is known as the biggest scoundrel of the 20th.C-Самий болшой жулик 20го вэка.And good old Gorby-the darling of the West is now advertising MacDonald`s Junk Food-he is a creature 1000 times more funnier than any Walt could imagine
In Response

by: Frank
December 12, 2011 00:16
Brazilian Man distorts in hs usaully twisted anti-Russian manner.

There're more Russians than other former Soviets.

Meantime, Stalin and the many other non-Russian Communists are an otherwise clear reality.

Post-Soviet Russia shows clear signs of breaking from the Soviet past - something that the above article, Satter (based on the article) and Brazilian Man downplay.

by: Anonymous
December 09, 2011 03:50
I'm sorry but I think communism was a pretty big step up from monarchy. Stalin was a tyrant, yes, but only one in a long line tyrannical czars before him. At least under communism society was more equitable. And that's why so many in Central Asia and Russia miss it. Get real, American Triumphalism died in 2008, and the capitalist west is in the same place the communist east was in the 80's. Wait until what happens when America defaults on its debt. It will be 1991 for the west.
In Response

by: Ivan the terrible from: Who knows where
December 09, 2011 12:20
Dear Anon. `communism` was a big step down from monarchy.You can put Stalin in a line with the `tyrannical` czars before him only if you are in a cold turkey state of mind from the bad quality of what you have smoked drank sniffed injected or taken god only knows how.American triumphalism has not died-if it does the whole world will go down with it.And the capitalist west is not and will never be where communism was in the 80`s-you just cant compare 2 wildly different and incomparable systems.Westerners like you can never never in a million years understand `communism`-you can read a lot and muse about it but you have not experienced it to have any proper judgement about it.The east and west shall never never bloody meet in a 1000 light years,folks.
In Response

by: M Heise from: Tbilisi
December 09, 2011 20:12
A step up ? That is pure and utter nonsense. Exile under the czars pales in comparison to the Gulag. Exiles could read books in their so-called prisons while Gulag prisoners were slave laborers struggling to survive. The capitalist West is hardly in the same place as the capitalist East. Were you ever in the DDR? I had family there that I visited. It was the best economy of the old Warsaw Pact and cannot even come close to comparing with any Land in Germany today.
In Response

by: Frank
December 12, 2011 00:23
Anonymous rehashes an inaccurately knee jerk sovok reply.

In point of fact, Russia was socioeconomically and politically advancing before 1917. Had there been no WW I, there's reason to believe that Russia had a good chance of developing into something better than what occurred. The suffering caused by WW I led to an increase in seeking an extreme alternative.

BTW, pre-1917 Russia doesn't measure so badly when compared to what was evident elsewhere during the era in question.



In Response

by: Ivan the terrible from: Russia
December 12, 2011 19:04
Frank,it was the so-called `revolution `which changed the course of history and the outcome of WWI.Can you imagine what would have happened with Russia and Europe if there was no `revolution`paid for and brought about by the masonic dens and Parvus type `socialists`??

by: Ray F. from: Lawrence, KS
December 09, 2011 20:58
I’m no expert, but the author does make a good point about the role of the individual in Russian society/politics. Granted, there are many problems in the west/US, but the fundamental idea that the state derives its authority from the consent of the governed, protects the individual citizen from state-sponsored terror. I’m not a big believer in picking at past historical scabs, but honestly examining the crimes of the communist period, might help the individual Russian understand that the person is more important than the state.

by: Waclaw Godziemba Maliszew from: Connecticut
December 11, 2011 19:08
Excellent review to an excellent and needed book.
In Response

by: Frank
December 12, 2011 00:25
Anti-Russian types are prone to giving such a reply.
In Response

by: dmitry
December 12, 2011 14:20
And knee-jerk defensive Russia defenders are prone to giving that reply. Give an argument or go away.
In Response

by: Frank
December 12, 2011 22:53
You come across as a phony Dmitry, given how you appear to readily accept the broad comment from Waclaw Godziemba Maliszew.

On the matter of going away, you can go somewhere else.

by: Milovan Rafailovic from: Lake Placid, Florida
December 13, 2011 15:17
That's what all societies do: minimize their own misdeeds. I lived in Germany in the 60s, and I never saw an admission of national guilt for the greatest crimes that the world had seen ever before. Americans are still proud of their criminal war in Vietnam. Russians look at the positive side of Communism. Even under that faulty ideology, it still had become a world power and it fought off the onslaught of the Nazis. Nobody wants to be burdened by guilt forever.

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
December 15, 2011 04:19
1.
USSR didn't "collapse" but returned back to CIS, according to 1936 Constitution and Preamble.

2.
"Great human tragedy of the former Soviet Union" is somehow misguidination from even more human tragedy of Russian tiranny that started with Varanga invasion into Russia in
9 Century A.D., bringing total genocide and bestial slavery.

3.
Russians are not facinated by death (they drunk death to death) - it is typical lying propaganda of Varanga - to mortify population inside Russian controll:
"dissobidiance to Varanga despots is deadly" and to justify Russian expansion and ethnic cleansing for the foreign powers outside of Russian controll:
"Russia payed by blood of Russian people, thus she has right to have it"

4.
"Zarist" brutality didn't "solidified" in soviet times, just became less personal (no "Mavric" spared for the Emperor's pleasure) - not unlike British Monarchy transformed into more cinical USA greed of gang of 300 Million people.
It is why USA torture and plagiarize me with help of Russia and former Soviet Babilon:
"It is better to split among ourself his priorities and royalties than give it to Konstantin!"
"Zars" would do about the same, only with personal touch, as the Zar that permitted to do it to Nikolos Tesla...

In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
December 17, 2011 08:50
where is my last comment?
It simce my most important arguments are vanishing or postponded...

PS:
Ideology of Capitalism versus Socializm is irelevent - France rebuilt itself since WW2 quite successfully, even Checks did, but later were squized by Russian occupation...

On another hand, even the trigger-happy-greedy USA was better off than occupied by Russians East, since WW2 ended - combining checks and ballances with Rosewelt's Social Security
System as a form of democracy...

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Kingsley As Karzai?

Latest Comment (1 total)

M: they put the dictators in power and they make fun of them More

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (3 total)

M: No, Chechens are not Tatars, and judging by how they wipe out Russian ... More

Moldova Sentences 3 On Uranium Charge

Latest Comment (1 total)

Ionas Aurelian Rus:
One should not only salute the capture of these officials by the Moldovan ... More