Wednesday, June 19, 2013


Serbia

Serbian Foreign Minister Wins Top UN Post After Bitter Fight

Serbian Foreign Minister Vuk JeremicSerbian Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic
x
Serbian Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic
Serbian Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic
TEXT SIZE - +
Serbia's Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic has won a vote to become the UN General Assembly president after a hard-fought diplomatic tussle with a Lithuanian candidate.

He secured 99 votes in a UN General Assembly election for the post, against 85 for Lithuania's UN ambassador Dalius Cekuolis.

Jeremic, 36, defeated Cekuolis, who had accused Russia of backing the Serb to punish Lithuania for its stance that annexation by the Soviet Union after World War Two brought the Baltic nation more than four decades of tyranny.

Jeremic will assume the post in September.

The job involves chairing the annual gathering of world leaders in New York in September and other UN events.

Based on reporting by AP and AFP
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 09, 2012 16:04
Lituania made a misstake, probably under influence
Of pro-German member of 1954 Imperio-resurect pact,
While pro-Russians giving "Legioners" a sweat-flatelence.
Little Lituania was bet to pin on non-Russian WW2 fight
Bad label, while Russia and Germano-Austria resize
Its new imperial borders - to overpush UN patience.

Serbia did same misstake - look bad for Germans,
They were overpushed and lost, be beat for be bad,
And lost Serbian populated areas to their neighbors.
This time Russ-Brit-Germ pact of 1954 lost the bet,
UN is not ready rewrite for Germany WW2 just war.

It's important thought, how far new Serbian UN post
Would help the Russia, the double-faced sterviatnik?
Will Serbia be prudent, or play again their game lost,
To please Russ-Brit-Germ-Austrio imperial kuriatnik?
To help Russia expand? Bow to the imperial bosses?
In Response

by: Eugenio from: Vienna
June 09, 2012 21:24
Dear Konstantin, I just love reading your comments when you sign with your own name :-): Please explain the concept of "overpushing" in some more detail!
Cheers from Vienna!
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 10, 2012 16:40
I always use my name, thought I have 2 first and 4 last names.
Overpushing means to push lack too far, while being let push,
Up to the point were one's rights pushing on rights of others.
Nature is empirical. Just War by USSR was unjust rush
By Ethnic Russia expand, to destroy smaller nations.

"Legioners" of such countries where fighting lost war,
As did Hungarians, when they learned Russian plans
Annex Hungary - denying Stalin exit of Hungary, at all.
Hungarian King abdicated, a Fashist leader in charge.
They fought be remembered - if Hungary is no more.

So did Baltics, West Ukrainians and number of others.
It is why they still nations! It is why Russians let Stalin
To call for amnisty, except for the guilty in War Crimes.
Increasingly "legioners" asked for publicity, pushing line
Till overpushed it, UN against nazi Germany be justified.

Serbians were on the just side of WW2 - however, later
They agreed not to debate illegal "Mashtrih" and no "CIS"
Of Yugoslavia nations, go not to UN to negotiate borders.
Instead they agreed be bad - indirectly helping Germans,
Make nazi Germany look proper by the 1954 pact orders,
Devide for Russia and Austria-Germany Europe borders.

Serbia was punished by UN and NATO, as was called tor.
However, giving ultimatum of Russia-Brits-Germs-Austrio,
Even miligated by Serbia-Russia shauvinists slander-hate,
They overpushed cutting to Belgrade size Serbian Borgios.

To a degree because of my rightings, simce the World see
That Serbian rights overpushed, and in a memory of WW2,
UN let Serbian win over Lituanian, say both are prudent too.
But Serbia, threatened from the West and poluted by nazis
Of Russian Imperial type, I hope don't loose right way again.

by: Eugenio from: Vienna
June 09, 2012 21:16
And here we go: the US is not even able to push its own candidate to the presidency of the UN GA (where Russia is just one of almost 200 member states) against the Russian will. How should they ever be able to push through the UN SC (where Russia has a veto power) an anti-Assad resolution? It's a retorical question of course :-).
In Response

by: Konstantin from: Los Angeles
June 10, 2012 16:55
Giving my respond to your previous comment,
You pushing luck for Russia too far like "ment",
(Pushy police officer that magnifying infraction)
To list of crimes including murder "confession".

Both desigions of UN made because of reality
And truth, to a degree because of what I wrote,
Not because of Russia's "kruchkotvory" spyity.
USA often pushing some agenda, being bought
By US Rusia-proxies, why Rashka-biggot mod?

by: Anonymous
June 09, 2012 23:04
everyone does his interests
where is the scandal ?

scandalous
is that there is still people
who believe that decisions made
FOR THEIR INTEREST
are also for interest of all humanity

wake up !

by: vn from: Belgrade
June 11, 2012 05:46
A show of vanity fair. About the article itself: you're putting us on about Jeremic's age for more than ten years.

As Serbia is in the spotlight again, please avail yourselves worldwide of the NGO services stationed in Belgrade, and claim them to be under your British, UN etc. flags. Serbia's government has been footing some of the UN bills for far too long. Another piece of advice: take care of your wallets and check on bills, especially the phone ones, as you'll be in for some unpleasant surprises.

Most Popular