Saturday, May 26, 2012


Features

Tajikistan Agrees To Allow Chinese Farmers To Till Land

Tajik President Emomali Rahmon pictured on a visit to Beijing.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Bruce Pannier
New guestworkers are coming to the cotton and rice fields of southern Tajikistan, and they are already sowing seeds of discontent.

Locals are outraged at the prospect of Chinese farmers arriving to work Tajik land, following Dushanbe's decision this week to lease out 2,000 hectares of land to the Uyghur Autonomous Region in western China.

That deal has added to simmering anger over the Tajik parliament decision just a week earlier to cede some 1,100 square kilometers of Tajik land (about 1 percent of the county's total land area) to China.

Many Tajiks, including Bakhtiyor, a young man interviewed by RFE/RL's Tajik Service on the streets of Dushanbe who gave only his first name, reacted sharply to the decision.

"Why do they give land to China? There are no Tajiks [interested in it]? They do not give land to Tajiks. People live in desperate conditions.... They should give land to our poor people," he said.

The government has defended its decision, saying the mountainous and unpopulated land along Tajikistan's eastern border contains little of value, with no farmland, minerals, or other resources.

That hasn't stopped Tajiks like this man from Dushanbe, who declined to provide his name, from openly questioning the way the government is parceling out Tajik land.

'No Good Consequences'

"This trend has no good consequence,“ he said. “Today, Tajiks themselves are facing a land shortage. Look at Dushanbe and its suburbs, at how many people need land and are not happy with land distribution. The government should not ignore this."

The new land-lease deal, which will bring 1,500 Chinese farmers to work the fields in the Kumsangir and Bokhtar districts of southern Khatlon Province, is building on such sentiments.

The Tajik government, which has not said much publicly about the lease agreement, has reasons for taking this step. Tajikistan's unemployment situation is so dire that hundreds of thousands of migrant workers, most of them men, are driven to work in Russia. Some stay for part of the year, some for several years, some never return.

This leads to a shortage of manpower in rural areas, which results in some land being left fallow, as appears to be the case with the land the Chinese are coming to farm. According to Tilomurod Daniyarov of the Agricultural Ministry's international affairs department, the Chinese are promising to introduce drip-irrigation methods and other contemporary farming techniques to the regions and share their expertise and technology with neighboring Tajik communities.

Tajikistan is 93 percent mountainous, and not all of the remaining seven percent is arable. The vast majority of rice and cotton they grow is exported. Considering that food and staples are often scarce in Tajikistan, the thought that outsiders would be allowed to till their soil is highly unpopular.

First Step

Tajik sociologist Rustam Haidarov warns that the entry of Chinese farmers is only the first step toward something bigger.

"It is China's strategy to resettle its people in different countries. It's China's policy,” he said. “They occupy slowly, cautiously. They realize their own goals in Tajikistan and affect our economic policy. In time this will lead to an influence in politics."

Haidarov added that "where thousands of Tajiks have left to go to Russia, the Chinese will fill the vacuum. Some [Tajiks] even marry Chinese."

China has invested some $4 billion in Tajikistan in recent years, and is participating in a number of joint projects. But China for the most part sends its own workforce to implement such projects, meaning unemployed Tajik laborers get no relief.

Tajikistan's labor migration service says there were some 30,000 Chinese migrant laborers in Tajikistan in 2007, most working on roads, electricity substations, and at mining sites. There are claims that some Chinese workers do not return home when the project is completed. By 2010 they numbered some 82,000.

More And More Merchants

Some of the newcomers are merchants. By some accounts there are some 100 Chinese merchants selling goods at the main bazaar in Dushanbe and more are coming all the time. Other areas see a similar trend. Some Tajik merchants claim their Chinese rivals are provided with discounted wares in China so that they sell them at reduced prices that their Tajik counterparts cannot match. Once driven out of business, these homegrown merchants have little choice but to join the ranks of migrant laborers in Russia.

Tajik officials vow they will limit the number of Chinese farmers to 1,500, but they have not yet specified what exactly the country will receive in return for leasing its farmland.

Kazakhstan's president proposed a similar deal to China at the end of 2009, but it proved so unpopular that the idea was quickly dropped.

Tajikistan's president did not make any announcement prior to the recent land-lease deal, nor apparently did any other Tajik official, leaving the agreement to come as a surprise.

Iskander Aliev from RFE/RL's Tajik Service contributed to this article
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Aibek
January 27, 2011 18:36
Kyrgyzstan also ceded many thousands of hectares to China and China has simply put up fences where it pleases.

And what is Bishkek (or Dushanbe) going to do about it?
In Response

by: Joe from: USA
January 27, 2011 20:07
If you are educated and have learned some bare minimum history, you would know that those lands were Chinese a hundred ago. Soviet Union took those lands away from China and now China only wants 1% back, which is too kind to the Tajiks and the Kazakhs!
In Response

by: ivo
January 28, 2011 00:08
oh right, how very kind of the Chinese that they're not even greeder to put their hands on MORE land. Just because these lands belonged to China at some period of time it doesn't mean they've become inherently Chinese for eternity.
In Response

by: Turgai
January 28, 2011 12:09
The Chinese and the USSR were both imperialist kafir powers that took land away from the Muslim Ummah.
In Response

by: AZIZ from: NY
January 28, 2011 17:58
... And some day in future apache descendants will claim their rights on USA. All non native americans will have to leave US. Did i get you right???
There will be only china and apachee land.
Oooh noo wait there might be someone who knows history better than me and you. I mean grand grand children of Adam and Eve oorr neandertalians.
JOE now you Tell me pls do they have any rights???
In Response

by: Tajik
January 30, 2011 04:54
The lands in the west of China including Xinjiang and Tibet never belonged to China not speaking about current Tajikistan and other Central Asian republics! So it is completely not acceptable to claim laid in independent states!

In Response

by: Bobo Tohir from: Afsona
February 03, 2011 10:50
Dear Joe,
It seems rather dull to claim that southern part of Tajikistan belonged to China. Even though China is an ancient land, it still does not mean that the land around it belonged to Chinese people. Likewise, if you READ the history of China, Tajikistan or any other neighbouring countries it will become evident that these lands were historically beloged, ruled and controlled by the local dynasties starting from the Bactrian and Sasanian empires.
I guess the sources you have read about these lands are more Shauvenistic that misrepresents the history of Central Asia at large and its newly independant countries in particular.
I would suggest you to re-read the history again and gauge it properly in order not to cofuse people with your wrong comments.
Thanks a lot.
In Response

by: Bobo Tohir from: Afsona
February 03, 2011 12:55
Dear Joe,

Have you read the geographic history of the world and how the Chinese viewed themselves when they comissioned a map of the world? I guess not.
Once I was reading about world maps and I came across an intersting passage, which says: A Chinese emperor commissioned his cartographers to produce the map of the world. His vision was as if Chine was at the Centre of the World and the rest are around it. After some time when his cartogreaphers showed him the world map that originated from Near and Middle East he was so disappointed that his country was shown as a suburbs to other neighbouring countries.
The implication still radiates from your representation as well and your world map and its political history seems to be as ancient as the story of Babulon. Just surfe the web or use the google map to see the world around chine and don't forget to decephiere the borderlands of modern Central Aisa and China.

by: Tajik from: Earth
January 28, 2011 01:37
China lease land to grow food and when it does export them Tajikistan will earn hard currency. In the other hand, western countries lease land for military bases for invasion.
In Response

by: AZIZ from: NY
January 28, 2011 18:03
I think it is more socio- political issue than thinking about export and hard currency.
For your inyerest in tajikistan we have whole bunch of great enterpreneurs who can truly use that land. However you should know better than i some little guys are not allowing them to do that.

by: Mikhail from: Dushanbe
January 28, 2011 06:33
Joe from USA, if you would learn some minimum history you would know that Alaska was Russian a hundreds ago. What if they would want to get percent back? What stupid thing you dare to speak here? History is history, past away times.

by: Nigora from: Dushanbe
January 28, 2011 10:54
I miss the logic:
"Tajikistan's unemployment situation is so dire that hundreds of thousands of migrant workers, most of them men, are driven to work in Russia"
So, there is no work in the country.
(...) This leads to a shortage of manpower in rural areas"
But then these men could work in the agriculture on the fields, isn`t it?
I think there is another reason why Chinese workers are needed here, but the journalist missed the point.
In Response

by: Brendan from: USA
January 29, 2011 03:33
No not really. The journalist is just reporting, this is not an editorial. But the article hints that Tajikistan doesn't have the skills or technology to develop the farms in the mountain areas. Perhaps the Tajik laborers are not farmers or do not want to live and work in the mountains.
My question is, are these "Chinese" farmers just Han Chinese? Or are they also ethnic Uyghurs, Tajiks and Kyrgyz who are Chinese citizens?
In Response

by: Salam
January 30, 2011 04:57
Mostly Han Chinese and probably prisoners. Minorities living in the west of China even haven't passports to go out of the country! They lack basic rights!
In Response

by: Bobo Tohir from: Afsona
February 03, 2011 12:36
Dear Brendan,
Just ask yourself a simple question: how the local people do not know the ways of working on the land, which they used for so many centuries? If the land was not arable at all, it would have been a mistake of Chinease to take these particular land and work on it. Likewise, how can you sitting in a big room or an office somewhere in Manhattan or Boston know whether these people don't have technology to work on it? Your proposition lacks a simple thing: understanding of the local reality. Just take your time and visit these regions and you will see that the same local people will cook a wonderful local meal called 'PLOF' or as they called it locally 'OSH' with the rise gronw on the same lands.
Don't just forget that reading a book on the history that has certain idealogical or political proclivities does not reflect the life of ordinary people. Equally, how could a person whose encounter with these area is not even defined within the confine of moderm political, economic and social framework diffrentiate what is good for the local people and what is not? It seems to me that your reading of the text lacks a simple understanding of the region. Why don't you buy a ticket and visit the area just to teach or work voluntirily there just to understand what these people are talking about.
Thanks,
BT

by: M from: USA/Tajikistan
January 30, 2011 10:42
Tajikistan was never a part of China, it was part of the Emirates of Bukhara in the south, of Kokand in the north, and independent rulers in the Pamirs before the Russian empire annexed what is now the country's land. Not that any of this should apply to today, you just should have your facts straight before you deny a country's sovereignty.

I think the issue of ceding uninhabited, and probably uninhabitable land in Badakhshon to China is of little importance, but the idea that Tajik workers will now have to compete with Chinese in their own country is abhorrent given that this isn't a natural migration of laborers, like Tajiks to Russia or Mexicans to the US, but rather a capitulation to the Chinese government itself. This was likely done as a deal to receive Chinese development contracts and/or aid, and I'd like to know what the Tajiks got in return, because I doubt it was worth it, at least for the everyday Tajik.
In Response

by: Bobo Tohir from: Afsona
February 03, 2011 11:02
The idea of sovereinity of any country is defined first of all in the rule of law that protects the citizens of the same country. It does not mean that somebody with a big stomach and long old tie could decide the fate of the citizens according to his own ill understanding or personal interests.
To give the inhabited land on the mountanious regions of Badakhshan is the most rediculous step that the government have taken. The question that strucks me at this point is where the money are gone if the land was given to the Chinese. Likewsise, a poor man leaving next to his ancestrial land in south of Tajikistan has been prevented from working on this land by a local bueracrat who does not really care where these people have a proper mean to survive. It reaminds me of a fable:
A vazier has come to the court and complained to the king that his people are starving. There is nothing they could comsume at least to survive the difficult days. The vizier's intention was to seek the support of the king. Nonetheless, the king looked at the vizier with astonishment and replied:
Tell the people to make rise poridge and eat.
The point, which the king missed is that the people had simply nothing to eat. How could they make a rise poridge if they rise have been taken from them to collect the tax for the kings treasure.
I think the goverment needs simply to learn from the previous mistake as the patience of people is always bordering with anger and at certain point it could explode.
Thanks

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Kingsley As Karzai?

Latest Comment (1 total)

M: they put the dictators in power and they make fun of them More

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (3 total)

M: No, Chechens are not Tatars, and judging by how they wipe out Russian ... More

Moldova Sentences 3 On Uranium Charge

Latest Comment (1 total)

Ionas Aurelian Rus:
One should not only salute the capture of these officials by the Moldovan ... More