Saturday, May 26, 2012


The Power Vertical

The Prodigal Ambassador Returns

Vladimir Chamov, Russia's former Ambassador to Libya, speaks to journalists after arriving at Moscow's Sheremetyevo-2 airport.
TEXT SIZE - +
The struggle over Russian policy toward the upheaval in Libya is far from over.

Former ambassador Vladimir Chamov, who was sacked last week, has returned to Moscow -- and he doesn't appear ready to go quietly into the sunset. 

In an interview published today in the daily "Moskovsky komsomolets," Chamov denied that he sent a telegram to President Dmitry Medvedev calling him a "traitor" over Russia's failure to veto the UN Security Council resolution authorizing a no-fly zone in Libya.

But he did say that he told Medvedev that Russia was betraying its interests in Libya by abandoning Muammar Qaddafi:

I wrote a telegram saying that I represent Russia's interests in Libya. Our country has recently been focused on establishing close cooperation there, and it is not in Russia's interest to lose a partner. Russian companies have signed very lucrative contracts for tens of billions of euros, which we could lose. That in some respects can be regarded as a betrayal of Russian interests.

Russia has said it will lose $4 billion in weapons deals in Libya as a result of an arms embargo on the country. Moreover, Reuters reports that Russian companies have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in oil and gas exploration in Libya. Russian Railways has also signed a 2.2 billion euro contract to build a railway in the country.

According to Russian press reports, Chamov, who told "Moskovsky komsomolets" that he "talked quite often" with Qaddafi, was instrumental in setting up many of the deals.

President Dmitry Medvedev sharply rebuked Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on Monday for comparing the international military actions in Libya to the crusades. Medvedev called those comments "unacceptable" and Putin later walked them back, saying he was simply expressing his personal opinion -- not Russian policy.

Asked what he thought of Putin's crusades reference, Chamov went out of his way to praise the prime minister, who is widely seen as Russia's true ruler. "What I particularly like about Vladimir Vladimirovich [Putin] is that he very clearly and briefly states his position. And in this case, I think he is not far from the truth," Chamov said according to "Moskovsky komsomolets."

Despite Chamov's dismissal as ambassador, and his outspokenness upon returning to Moscow, he has remarkably not been fired from the Foreign Ministry, where he serves as a career diplomat. Prior to his posting in Libya he served as a Russian ambassador to Iraq from 2004-8.

"Moskovsky komsomolets" reported that Chamov gave them the interview shortly after his arrival at Moscow's Sherametavo-2 airport late Wednesday night.

In his on-camera remarks to journalists upon landing, he was much more guarded.

WATCH THE VIDEO HERE (IN RUSSIAN COURTESY OF RIA-NOVOSTI):



As I blogged here yesterday, the discord over Moscow's policy toward the Libya crisis appears to reflect a broader debate going on among the Russian elite.

Medvedev and his allies, analysts say, are aiming to dial back Moscow's tendency to oppose and confront the United States on every issue in favor of broader cooperation with Washington. Putin and the security service veterans close to the prime minister remain deeply skeptical of such a change.

This debate has been going on for some time, particularly since U.S. President Barack Obama initiated Washington's "reset" in relations with Moscow. What is somewhat surprising is that it has become so public, with Medvedev and Putin so personally involved.

-- Brian Whitmore

Tags: libya , Russian foreign policy , Vladimir Chamov , Putin-Medvedev tandem

This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: La Russophobe from: USA
March 25, 2011 18:33
It's sick even by Russian standards that this freak is proudly sporting a keffiyeh and encouraging Russia to embrace the rogue regimes of Islam rather than the democracies of the West.

But one has to agree: Russia has a lot more in common with those rogue regimes, and no apparent desire to become civilized or successful. It seems Russians only want to thumb their nose at the world while circling the toilet bowl on the way to the final flush.
In Response

by: Slava
March 30, 2011 06:50
For the record, the ambassador in question has taken a diffrent line from what's stated in the above article:

http://cdi.org/russia/johnson/russia-libya-remarks-ambassador-620.cfm
In Response

by: La Russophobe from: USA
April 04, 2011 19:07
For the record, you're absolutely wrong. He simply qualified his remarks slightly as a matter of semantics.

And what's more, there are LOTS of Russians who agree with him. Russia has AGGRESSIVELY sought to undermine UN and NATO sanctions and to provide propaganda cover for the Libyan dictator and has totally ignored the plight of the freedom-loving people of Libya.

Russians lose no opportunity to thumb their noses at democracy and at the West, in particular the USA. They revel in American hardships and delight in the setbacks of democracy. They freely associate themselves with all the worst rogue regimes of the planet, and they will suffer the consequences of this insane foreign policy.

by: Russcon from: Russia
March 26, 2011 21:24
@Russophobe: Western intervention in Libya boils down to oil interests, just as much as Putin's opposition to it does.

@Power Vertical: Medvedev's tacit support of Western intervention, you're right, does look like a direct assault on the military-industrial establishment that has ran the country for the last decade, but what does Russia, much less Medvedev himself, stand to gain by it? Hopefully it doesn't tarnish what during the last year looks to have been a genuine reversal of Russian policy away from Putinism...
In Response

by: Anonymous from: USA
March 27, 2011 21:20
@ Russcon
What you are saying is exactly is the same as what was said about Iraq. Except Russia and China have been so far the biggest investors in Post-Saddam Iraq. America gets most of its imported oil from its neighbors Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, T&T, and itself! The USA is STILL one of the largest non-OPEC oil producers in the world, it just uses all it produces. If there was more political will, the USA could be oil-independent just like it is currently gas-independent. Libya has seen no foreign troops on the ground to secure those precious oil wells, and I doubt that it will.
In Response

by: Russcon from: Moscow
March 30, 2011 13:42
Europe has very strong oil interests in Libya and Gaddafi was/is a very strong (anti-American/ anti-Western) consensus builder across the Arab world. Even if the West is unable to secure a reliable, relatively cheap supply of oil from Libya in the aftermath of the war, seeing a weaker, more pliable ruler come to power will ultimately be in the benefit of both America and Europe, though probably not for a majority of Libyans -- a fractured, ostensibly pro-Western government in the midst of civil unrest, has rarely served its own people well...
In Response

by: Anonymous from: USA
March 30, 2011 23:12
@ Russcon
The "consensus" across the Arab world, is that Gaddafi no longer has the legitimacy to be the eternal ruler of Libya. The Arab League opposes his rule and wants him to step down. Cheap suppy of oil to the West? Last I remember, the price of oil is defined by the GLOBAL market. The USA isn't the largest oil consumer in the world anymore...China is. Russians have made no secret about wanting to control the EU's oil supply. Whenever Brussels acts in the interests of "fair competition" in its energy markets, Vlad Putin accuses the EU of "robbery".

About This Blog

The Power Vertical is a blog written especially for Russia wonks and obsessive Kremlin watchers by Brian Whitmore. It covers emerging and developing trends in Russian politics, shining a spotlight on the high-stakes power struggles, machinations, and clashing interests that shape Kremlin policy today. Check out The Power Vertical Facebook page or

Listen

​​