Thursday, August 25, 2016


Ukrainian President's Millions In Book Fees Raise Eyebrows

Viktor Yanukovych is not only president of Ukraine but the country's best-paid author as well, according to a recent declaration on his website.
Viktor Yanukovych is not only president of Ukraine but the country's best-paid author as well, according to a recent declaration on his website.
By Yevhen Solonyna and Daisy Sindelar
KYIV -- Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych has never been known as a man of letters.

He famously misspelled "professor" when listing his academic title during a failed presidential bid and once praised the residents of Lviv for their remarkable "genocides" when he actually meant to say "gene pools."

And in December 2010, he momentarily forgot the Ukrainian word for fir tree -- "yalynka" -- falling back on the Russian "yolka" instead.

So it's come as a surprise to some that the notoriously ineloquent Yanukovych has emerged as Ukraine's best-paid author.

An income declaration published on his presidential website claims that in 2011 Yanukovych earned more than 16.4 million hryvnyas ($2 million) in copyright fees for numerous books, including "A Year in Opposition," "A Year in Office," and "How Ukraine Should Live Further," as well as any books he may pen in the future.

With that $2 million payout -- courtesy of the Donetsk-based publisher Noviy Svit -- Yanukovych's single-year earnings put him comfortably in the ranks of another presidential author, Barack Obama, who earned $2.5 million in royalties from his books in 2008, the year of his election as U.S. president.

Not surprisingly, it also makes Yanukovych one of the highest-paid authors in Ukraine, a country where the average salary is just $300 a month.

Irene Rozdobudko, an award-winning Ukrainian journalist and author of such novels as "The Lost Button," says she finds Yanukovych's reported book earnings hard to believe.

"In Ukraine, this situation is impossible for any writer because authors' fees and royalties are very small," Rozdobudko says. "This is an example of our corruption. We have authors who are on a level with William Faulkner, who are recognized around the world. But I don't think they've ever been paid so much."

'Did He Write A Single Line?'

Yanukovych, whose hardscrabble upbringing and early criminal convictions have led to more contemporary claims of corrupt privatization deals and abuse of office, has attempted to deflect attention from his $2 million paycheck by announcing plans to contribute his literary earnings to charity.

On April 15, Yanukovych said his profits would be used exclusively to help "sick people, and primarily children."

Presidential largesse aside, many writers say they remain perplexed by Yanukovych's earnings because of the deeply dubious quality of his writing.

His most recent book, an English-language paean to Ukraine's investment possibilities called "Opportunity Ukraine," caused ripples following its release last autumn after entire portions of the book appeared to be plagiarized.

Andriy Kokotyukha, a screenwriter and the author of popular detective novels and a series of books for teens, says he's skeptical that the president ever set fingers to keyboard during the creation of his books.

"I'm not sure [Yanukovych] wrote a single line himself," Kokotyukha says. "But if he patented all of his gaffes, such as 'yolka,' and received royalties every time they were used, then he would make much more than 16 million hryvnyas."

A Copy For Everyone!

Allies of Yanukovych have defended his outsize earnings as legitimate, saying Ukraine operates according to a market economy and that no publishing house would make payouts without a guaranteed return.

But others say they question who, precisely, is buying Yanukovych's books. Ukrainian bookstores rarely carry the presidential tomes, and in the case of "Opposition Ukraine," at least one determined reader had to travel to the Vienna-based publisher to track down a copy. ("Opposition Ukraine," as opposed to Yanukovych's other books, was not published by Noviy Svit.)

Vasyl Shklyar, whose 2011 novel "Black Raven" looks at the Ukrainian resistance movement in the 1920s, says there is one way -- albeit a not very realistic one -- in which Yanukovych could, in fact, have legitimately earned his $2 million paycheck.

"To make so much money in royalties, he would have to sell two copies of his book to every Ukrainian, including children, old people, and blind people," Shklyar says.

Written by Daisy Sindelar in Prague, based on reporting by Yevhen Solonyna in Kyiv
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
by: mykry from: NY
April 18, 2012 15:35
Yanukovych just made a public delaration of his wages and other income for 2011. He made UAH 757,600 or about $96,000. If he made $2 million in book fees then something is wrong with his accounting. Let's look deeper; how can anyone claiming to make under a $100 grand per year possibly live in such a magnificent palace in Kyiv where upkeep alone must be several hundred thousand per year? And he has several of these 'residences.' Hmmm.
In Response

by: Eugenio from: Vienna
April 18, 2012 18:08
The presidential palace in Kiev is of course his official residence - for the time of his presidency only. It's not his private estate - he will vacate it when his presidential term expires. Where do you want him to live - in a rented appt on the Adreevsky Spusk? Or maybe better in the Darnitsa District - and come to work with subway. How was it? "Oberezhno, dveri zachinyaiutsia" :-)).
In Response

by: UKR FAN from: Canada
April 19, 2012 02:55
To Eugenio

I think your second suggestion of Darnitsa District sounds sort of poetic; perhaps that is where the best place for Yanukovych to live.
Good suggestion.
In Response

by: mykry from: NY
April 19, 2012 14:17
I fully agree that a president should be entitled to living standards and accomodations as are of the expected norm for such a position. However, even the excesses at Mezhyhyria (including mansion, sports club, shooting gallary, indoor/outdoor tennis, golf course, bowling, future yacht club, several pools, ponds, etc., etc.) are of secondary consideration to the main issue---who owns the property? Yanukovych resides there but has been very careful in distancing himself from ownership. If not he, then who? His son? The family? Partners or 'business associates?' Nationals or foreigners? How does he afford this? Are these benifits gifted? At what expense and for what favors?
This property was acquired from the state---under what circumstances and what funding? I hope you can see the light by such gross 'accounting anomalies.'
In Response

by: Eugenio from: Vienna
April 20, 2012 05:14
Hey, MYKRY, you are saying: "How does he afford this? Are these benifits gifted? At what expense and for what favors?" Well, I am sure you know just as well as everyone else does, that all the top Ukrainian politicians (former or present) - be it Kuchma, Yushchenko, Julia or Yanukovich - have been, are and will continue benefiting from various transparent and untransparent deals signed between the Naftogaz of Ukraine, on the one hand, and the Russian Gazprom, on the other, to ensure (a) that Ukraine continues receiving Russian gaz without interruptions and (b) this very same gaz continues flowing through the Ukrainian territory to the EU, therewith generating transit fees for the Ukrainian state.
Thus, I would assume that the Mezhyhyria residence that you are mentioning is as well being financed from this very same source. If one moves Yanukovich away from power tomorrow, the day after someone else will come to take over his position and will continue receiving money from the same source - and I even think that everyone is aware of this fact. You may consider this kind of perks as a sort of an "intermediary fee" :-).
But given that Ukraine - like most other emerging economies - is experiencing stable and healthy economic growth, that contrasts very favourably to the the economic stagnation/recession that most EU member states are stuck in ever since the outbreak of the current crisis in 2008, this kind of facts (Mezhyhyria) will most probably remain secondary for the public opinion in the country itself.

Most Popular

Editor's Picks