Sunday, May 26, 2013


Pakistan

Panetta Backs Conditions For Pakistani Aid

US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta speaks with US troops during his recent visit to Kabul.US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta speaks with US troops during his recent visit to Kabul.
x
US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta speaks with US troops during his recent visit to Kabul.
US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta speaks with US troops during his recent visit to Kabul.
TEXT SIZE - +
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta says Washington should consider putting conditions on aid to Pakistan. 

Speaking at a Senate budget hearing, Panetta said Washington should not end aid to Pakistan, but examine putting conditions on it. He didn't elaborate.

He said Pakistan's decision to close land routes to Afghanistan was costing the United States millions more to ship supplies to forces there. 

"We've also had the closure of these ground lines, the so-called g-locks in Pakistan.  And the result of that is that it is very expensive because we're using the northern transit route in order to be able to draw down our forces and also supply our forces.  I think the amount is about $100 million a month because of the closure," Panetta explained.

Pakistan took the step after a NATO air attack last November accidentally killed 24 Pakistani soldiers. 

On June 11, the United States announced it was withdrawing its team of negotiators from Pakistan without securing a deal to reopen the routes. 

One of the issues holding up an agreement is believed to be Pakistani insistence the United States apologize for the November strike, something the Pentagon has been unwilling to do.

But Panetta explained at the hearing that the apology wasn't the only issue.

"The United States has made clear that mistakes were made, and they were made on our side, they were also made on the Pakistani side.  We expressed condolences for the mistakes that were made, we've made that clear.  We have certainly continued to make clear the mistakes that were made.  I think the problem is that at this point, they're asking not only for that [an apology], but there are other elements of the negotiation that are also involved," Panetta said.

The comments come less than a week after Panetta said during a trip to Kabul that the United States was reaching the limits of its patience with Pakistan because of the safe havens it offered to insurgents fighting in neighboring Afghanistan. 

Based on AFP and Reuters reporting
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: William from: Aragon
June 14, 2012 23:11
Washington has always placed conditions on aid to anywhere, not just to Pakistan. I find that the American people themselves are big-hearted and generous, but their government administration plays politics with aid. Military aid is usually given to foreign governments under the condition that they buy US-manufactured weapons, so basically the US taxpayer's dollars are given to armaments manufacturers - US citizens will have to decide if this is good value for their tax-dollars.

by: ahmed41 from: HP
June 15, 2012 00:05
NATO forces need the Pakistan route for their supplies. This method is the cheapest.
So it is a matter of striking a suitable transit route bargain.

About US aid ??? Where ever a country receives such *aid*, it becomes " aid dependent".

Perhaps Pakistan and Afghanistan should think seriously about long term measures to not take US aid.

Aid used correctly, is OK---------but it does become a dependency. Do the aid givers ever assess whether the aid is used for the purpose it was given ???

Most Popular