Wednesday, August 31, 2016


What The Deadly U.S. Helicopter Crash Tells Us About Afghanistan

Two U.S. Chinook helicopters land at Kandahar airfield in March 2011.
Two U.S. Chinook helicopters land at Kandahar airfield in March 2011.
U.S. forces absorbed what was arguably the single largest blow of the nearly 10-year Afghan war over the weekend, when Taliban militants apparently shot down a Chinook helicopter carrying 30 U.S. troops -- most of them Navy SEALs in the deadliest incident in that elite force's history -- and a translator along with seven Afghan commandos.

As the U.S. military and civilian leadership come to grips with the loss and await the results of an investigation into its contributing factors, there is a short list of potential lessons already emerging:

1) Taliban Stingers?

Although outside observers and Afghan military experts speculate that the insurgents might now have access to sophisticated antiaircraft weapons, a U.S. administration source described the Chinook downing as a "last lucky shot." But the Taliban subsequently claimed to have shot at and struck another Chinook in the mountainous Zurmat region of the southeastern Paktia Province on August 8. NATO acknowledged that one of its helicopters made a "hard landing" but denied Taliban claims that militants had killed 33 foreign troops in the attack.

Afghan military specialist Amrullah Aman says the insurgents constantly change their tactics. "In Afghanistan's neighboring region, Taliban are helped with weapons and logistics," he claims. "Eight years ago, they were not in a position to fight pitched battles."

The fear is that insurgent access to sophisticated antiaircraft weapons risks a recast version of what's been dubbed Charlie Wilson's War, when U.S.-supplied Stinger missiles rendered the Soviet air force ineffective. In the current conflict, NATO relies on its superior air force to counter insurgents' use of their native terrain and control over parts of the population.

2) Night-Raids Backlash

Helicopters are the primary means of transportation for the many night raids U.S. troops routinely conduct across Afghanistan. In what is considered a repeat of the Iraqi model of dismantling insurgent networks, U.S. Navy SEALs frequently descend on remote mountain villages to kill or capture insurgency leaders. Successive U.S. military commanders consider such raids a weapon of choice against battle-hardened enemies and have increased their frequency.

But the killings have inadvertently promoted a younger generation of insurgents into leadership positions. These Taliban leaders espouse a harder line and sympathize with Al-Qaeda's global jihad. And they have spread panic among Afghanistan's ruling elite -- following the assassination of a number of senior Afghan officials this year, many Afghan government officials are now preoccupied with ducking would-be Taliban assassins.

3) Taliban Encircling Kabul

The downing of a U.S. helicopter so close to Kabul suggests the Taliban are inching closer to the Afghan capital -- the biggest prize in any Afghan war. In the past few years, Taliban fighters have systematically infiltrated rural communities in Wardak, Logar, Kapisa, Nanagarhar, and Laghman provinces, which nearly ring Kabul. The situations in Wardak and Logar, abutting the Afghan capital in the southwest and southeast, are particularly dire because the Taliban now dominates all aspects of life. A presence in these provinces is considered crucial to eventually taking over Kabul -- something the Taliban appear to have their sights set on.

4) The Costs Of War

Arguably the most significant thing to take away from the Chinook downing, though, is that war is still the order of the day in Afghanistan. The Taliban, with the help of its backers and allies, is trying to bleed Americans sufficiently to force them out of the country. Washington, on the other hand, believes that killing a large number of Taliban militants, leaders in particular, will force the Taliban to negotiate on favorable terms. Afghan civilians, already dying in significant numbers, will continue to suffer the price.

-- Abubakar Siddique
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
August 08, 2011 22:27
I support our brave troops . Currently the Afghan war has many of the trappings of the Vietnam war. The enemy looks exactly like the people you are supposedly trying to save and protect. War is always bad, but at least a war we engage in should be relavent to our national security and realistically winnable. This war is looking like a loser on both counts. Since AlQueda can set up training camps in almost any third world country( ie Somalia) why is fighting in Afghanistan worth it?

by: Ray F. from: Lawrence, KS
August 09, 2011 01:20
What does this disaster tell me? Just part of the cost of doing business (CODB) on today’s battlefield. The U.S. and its military-industrial-congressional-entertainment complex have transformed the horror of war into a money-making enterprise for those lucky enough to have a piece of the action. There is no strategy to this war, other than making money. The bloody machine will grind on until the dollar has been completely devalued; and maybe not even then. Sheer, unadulterated madness.

by: Khalid from: Peshawar
August 09, 2011 12:38
Your speculations are realistic but you skirt the real issues. The unfortunate crash of the Chinook and the loss of lives needs to be examined in the context of the question what are the causes that have led to such a bloody situation both in Afghanistan and Pakistan?
A large percentage of the population in both Afghanistan and Pakistan view the continuance presence of the US/NATO presence after the removal of the Taliban regime in 2001 as illegitimate; Pakistan is accused of assisting in this illegitimate presence; another sizable number of persons in both countries view the events unfolding in the interregnum since 2001 as a colonial interlude. The US Army Manual 3.07 dealing with stabilization operations itself accepts that stabilization is bound to fail unless actions of the military are legitimate. For instance has President Karzai permitted the conduct of night raids in Afghanistan? According to reports there are 13 to 16 such raids every night in Afghanistan. It was thus only a matter of time before the SEALS suffered a hit.
Col Kilcunnen the counter-insurgency expert estimates that in the drone strikes the ratio of collateral deaths for each wanted person killed is 1:40. There are also plenty of innocent deaths reported in the night raids. The issue of legitimacy must thus be faced frontally to end the tragic deaths of persons on either side - otherwise this bloodletting in Afghanistan and Pakistan unfortunately would continue. As Karl Meyer says in “The Dust of Empire,” “In foreign relations, so history suggests, overbearing dominion breeds neither affection nor respect.”

About Gandhara

Gandhara is a blog dedicated to Afghanistan and Pakistan written by RFE/RL journalists from Radio Mashaal (Pakistan), Radio Azadi (Afghanistan), our Central Newsroom, and other services. Here, our people on the ground will provide context, analysis, and some opinions on news from the Afghanistan-Pakistan region. Send comments or questions to gandhara [at]