Saturday, May 26, 2012


Gandhara

Why The Taliban Won't Negotiate

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid
TEXT SIZE - +
The Taliban have resoundingly rejected reports that they are conducting direct talks with the United States. In a press statement released on May 18, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid dismissed recent media reports of possible peace negotiations. "The Washington Post" recently reported that a U.S. representative attended at least three meetings in Qatar and Germany with a Taliban official who is believed to be close to Mullah Muhammad Omar, the group’s leader.

Mujahid described these reports as “mere futile rumors.” He added: “The allegation that the Taliban want to open an office in a certain country is not true. We have not asked for the opening of an office in any country including Qatar…. [Afghanistan] is our permanent address, which is equally well known both to friends and enemies. None can deny our presence there nor are we people who lack an address or country.”

Reports of progress in peace talks with the Taliban almost always meet with denials from the Taliban themselves. There are several reasons for this reluctance. The main one is simple enough: They believe they’re winning.

The Taliban continues to focus on the goal of military victory because they know they have little future in a government where their long-time rivals, the so-called Northern Alliance, hold most of the key posts. War also happens to be a major source of income for Taliban leaders. The endless fighting in Afghanistan gives them cover for the lucrative business of smuggling arms and opium. The same applies to the warlords who oppose them. They, too, have little incentive for peace.

Some Afghan officials are part of the network of drug lords. Some of them have close relations with Iran and Pakistan, both countries that also have little interest in peace in Afghanistan. Pakistan’s intention to sabotage any discussion of peace is evident from the fate of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar. Baradar, Mullah Omar’s second-in-command, was arrested by the Pakistanis in February 2010. It is widely rumored that he was targeted for participating in back-channel peace talks with the Afghan government.

The war on terror in general, and the Afghan war in particular, have brought considerable economic benefit to Pakistan. The United States announced billions of dollars for its new ally, Pakistan, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. Eager to attack terrorist hideouts in Pakistan, the United States announced millions of dollars in emergency aid to Islamabad to strengthen security on Pakistan’s borders with Afghanistan. Pakistan knows the United States needs its help in the war on terror and uses the Afghan war to put diplomatic pressure on India. Pakistan will not want to lose that leverage.

There can be little doubt that some elements within the Taliban are talking with the U.S. or Afghan officials about peace. The Taliban are a heterogeneous group and not all of them want to go on fighting forever. But even the most war-weary among them are under considerable pressure from the Pakistanis to deny any rumors of negotiations. The likely alternative is arrest -- or perhaps even death.

-- Bashir Ahmad Gwakh & Christian Caryl
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Aslam
May 23, 2011 07:20
A very well articulated article. Lot of things covered in few words.

by: Ingush from: Ingushetia
May 23, 2011 16:58
"Why The Taliban Won't Negotiate"
Plain and simple: they believe they will fight till the Day of Resurrection on the path of The God. Two empires: the Soviet and the British found their demise in Afghanistan.

by: Bill Webb from: Phoenix AZ
May 23, 2011 17:16
You can't have any meaningful negotiations with those murdering, drug-dealer rodents anyway.

by: Shahwali
May 23, 2011 20:54
With all due respect to the writers, I should say that they might be good in writing straight reports or news items, but they seem to be too inept to write an analytical piece, especially on this complicated topic. From Ahmad Rashid's Taliban to his Descent into Chaos and Bob Woodward's Obama's wars and other research papers about the conflict in Afghanistan it is crystal clear that this is Pakistan that plays the game and has the upper hand in Afghanistan’s politics not the ghosts of the Taliban. There are many flaws in this piece that I do not even want to bring up at this point. The poor writers should have entiled their superficial piece as Why the Pakistanis Won't Negociate and then should have researched and come up with a nice attention-grabbing nut graph, solid and profound content and finally a significant context. Thanks very much!
In Response

by: Aslam
May 24, 2011 12:39
The wrters have indeed said it is Pakistan that the Taliban can't negotiate. There are reasons mentioned too---financial benfits and diplomatce pressure on Indian and in the regio to mention a few. Please tell us what are the negatives of this articles.

About Gandhara

Gandhara is a blog dedicated to Afghanistan and Pakistan written by RFE/RL journalists from Radio Mashaal (Pakistan), Radio Azadi (Afghanistan), our Central Newsroom, and other services. Here, our people on the ground will provide context, analysis, and some opinions on news from the Afghanistan-Pakistan region. Send comments or questions to gandhara [at] rferl.org.