map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

Saddam Hussein RFE/RL Attack Plot Covered In International Media

The story about Saddam Hussein's plot to attack RFE/RL's Prague headquarters has been reported by several major news outlets around the world. More
More Articles

 

... ... ...

Features

Azerbaijan Could Scuttle Nabucco Over Turkey-Armenia Deal

Is Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev weighing his options for gas exports?

October 19, 2009
By Brian Whitmore
Azerbaijan has apparently decided to play its energy card.

As much of the world applauded Turkey's historic rapprochement with Armenia last week, Azerbaijan felt left out in the cold and abandoned by its closest ally.

Baku had argued strenuously that a deal to reestablish relations between Ankara and Yerevan should not be signed while Armenia continued to occupy Nagorno-Karabakh, and it threatened to take unspecified countermeasures if one was.

Speaking at a nationally televised cabinet meeting on October 16, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev revealed one of those steps: "It is not a secret to anyone that for many years Azerbaijan has been selling its gas to Turkey for one-third of market prices."

Aliyev added: "What state would agree to sell its natural resources for 30 percent of world market prices, especially under current conditions? This is illogical."

The route of the Nabucco project
Aliyev presented the move as a purely commercial decision and did not explicitly link it to the Turkish-Armenian deal. Azerbaijan currently sells Turkey natural gas at the bargain rate of $120 per thousand cubic meters. But the timing of Aliyev's announcement, less than a week after the accord between Yerevan and Ankara was signed, left little doubt.

If Baku follows through on the move, analysts say it could severely undermine -- if not completely kill -- the Western-backed Nabucco pipeline project to bring gas from the Caspian Sea to Europe via Turkey.

"Potentially this is very important because it could potentially deliver a knockout blow to Nabucco. Without Azerbaijan it would be even more difficult than it is," says Federico Bordonaro, an energy-security analyst with the Italian-based group equilibre.net.

Nabucco vs. South Stream

The Nabucco project, which is designed to bypass Russia by bringing gas from the Caspian region via Georgia and Turkey into the rest of Europe, is a key element of a Western strategy to break Moscow's stranglehold on Europe's energy supplies and establish alternative routes and suppliers for the continent.

Russia, for its part, is pushing its own competing pipeline project, called South Stream, that would transport Russian gas to Europe via the Black Sea and Bulgaria.

Aliyev said one option for Azerbaijan would be to export its gas to Europe via Russia, which analysts say would dovetail with Moscow's pipeline plans.

"We should not rule out the possibility that the Russians are trying to use these tensions in order to turn Azerbaijan against Nabucco and directly or indirectly [support] South Stream," Bordonaro says.

Indeed, as the Turkey-Armenia rapprochement gained steam -- and it became clear that it would proceed without progress on Nagorno-Karabakh -- Aliyev began moving closer to Moscow.

Has Aliyev (right) decided to throw in his lot with Russia and Dmitry Medvedev?
He met with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev at a summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in Chisinau on October 9, just before Turkey and Armenia signed their accord.

And on October 14, when Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian was in Turkey watching a World Cup soccer match with his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul, Azerbaijan signed a deal to sell 500 million cubic meters of natural gas annually to Russia's Gazprom starting in 2010.

Speaking about the deal, Aliyev said the 500 million cubic meters was just a starting point and that there was "no upper limit" to the amount of gas Baku could sell to Russia.

Is He Bluffing?

While Aliyev's move has heightened fears that Azerbaijan may be moving quickly into Moscow's orbit, some observers say he could be bluffing in an attempt to influence Turkey's parliament, which is due to debate the agreement normalizing relations with Armenia on October 21.

"The Azerbaijanis could be saying [to the West and Turkey] that if you are not supportive of us on Nagorno-Karabakh, we will choose South Stream over Nabucco," Bordonaro says.

"It is difficult to say if they are bluffing or not. But we shouldn't rule out that they are not bluffing."

Ilham Shaban, a Baku-based energy analyst, is more sanguine. He tells RFE/RL's Azerbaijani Service that pipelines delivering Azerbaijani gas to Europe via Turkey have a much larger capacity than those passing through Russia.

"Turkey is the door that Azerbaijan needs to use to get it’s energy resources to the world market. We need to make this door wider. And this was our policy so far," Shaban says.

"I don’t think we are going to close this door because of these protocols" between Turkey and Armenia.

Turkey broke off diplomatic relations with Armenia in 1993 in support of Azerbaijan, which was fighting a losing battle against ethnic Armenian separatists in Nagorno-Karabakh.

In response to Azerbaijan's anger over the normalization with Armenia, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu assured Baku that its support remains unchanged, saying, "Azeri soil is as sacred for us as our own."

Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz indicated on October 19 that Ankara is ready to pay more for Azerbaijan's gas, suggesting more negotiations were on the horizon.

RFE/RL's Azerbaijani Service contributed to this report
This forum has been closed.
    Next 
Comments page of 3
by: RD
November 13, 2009 15:04
Nick, it is hard to understand what you are trying to say since your sentence structure and more importantly your reasoning is a disaster.
Despite Azerbaijan's oil and gas resources, the country this year is experiencing more than $1.5 billion dollars in budget deficit. More than 42% of Azeris live under the poverty line, which is under $200 a month. Very interesting when you consider Azerbaijan's natural wealth. At least Armenia has some excuse being a poor country blockaded from all sides by unfriendly neighbours and no natural resources worth talking about. My message to you and other Azeris is, to stop you silly war mongering rhetoric. You want a war? You may start one and you may re-take NKR back again, but you will drive your country into further disaster economically, and socially. The resolution to the NKR conflict is diplomacy and not your puerile war mongering. The worst case scenario is you lose another war and you look like a bunch of asses globally. You may want to read a book called; "The Three Trillion Dollar War", which will give you an idea what the actual costs of ware are. Furthermore, you may want to remember what Winston Churchill once said about someone who starts war. When you start a war, you are no longer in control of your destiny. You never know the outcome. The Americans in Iraq would have done well to remember that and you should remember that before you start a war yourself.

by: RD
November 13, 2009 14:53
Karim, the dictator Stalin put NK under Azerbaijan SSR control for his convenience. However, he was planting seeds of unrest by putting a mainly Armenian population under Azeri rule. If you Azeris were a little bit more noetic, you would have taken better care of your citizens. If you had done that, they would not have wanted to separate from Azerbaijan. As for NKR returning back to Azerbaijan again, your war mongering politicians in Baku may re-take NKR by force again, but it will still not put closure to the conflict. The people of NKR do not trust you as a government and will never willingly live under Azeri rule. You can kill them like you have done in the past but they will rise and fight you again.

by: Karim from: USA
November 12, 2009 22:28
Garabah was and will be territory of Azerbaijan, where lived and can live Armenian as any other nation.

by: Nick from: NY
November 12, 2009 22:22
Mr RD. do you member of staff of Armenian propogandist machine ?? Your comment is tool of misinformation
Isolation and crash it's real threat of tomorrow's Armenia.
I think you see them, but your approach and reception of their resolve completely incorrect. I very sorry but today it's Armenian disaster.

by: RD
October 25, 2009 15:16
A friendly recommendation to our Azeri readers. Lobby your government to get on the co-operation wagon and not the war wagon. If you do not, you will find your country politically isolated. The only reason you have support from the west or anywhere for that matter is your oil and gas. You have to have more legs than just that to stand on. Stop your blockade or Armenia, and you will see how much further you can get with your negotiations to resolve the NKR conflict vis a vis threatening war. Even if war errupted and Azerbaijan re-claimed territory, the conflict will still be un-resolved.

by: tiraniyaya son
October 25, 2009 07:04
Russia might succeed in delaying Nabucco and selling gas through southern stream. But the gas in southern stream is still controlled by Russia it just goes around Ukraine.
Azerbaijan's meager resources were only supposed to start the process of Nabucco and provide for the first stage and Azerbaijan was supposed to be a link to Central Asia. Then Iraq would be ready to supply further natural gas. And by that time they hoped Iranian regime would fall and they could invest into Iranian pipelines.
When it comes to natural gas, the only long term alternatives to Russia are Iran and Qatar. To reach Europe the natural gas from Iran and Qatar has to go through Turkey. And that is why Nabucco has to happen sooner or later.

by: RD
October 25, 2009 07:02
Gets a little old listening to Azeris complaining about history of Karabakh to justify themselves as the rightful inhabitants of Karabakh. Using is not a good argument. How far back do we go? To Roman, Greek, Persian times? The fact of the matter remains that right back into the 1920's, Karabakh was mainly inhabited by Armenians. Stalin, in his wisdom, decided Karabakh should be part of Azerbaijan SSR, ostensibly to keep the region under its control and dependant on Moscow. If the Armenians in Karabakh were not treated as second class citizens when part of Azerbaijan, there would have been no reason for them to want to separate from Azerbaijan. You take good care of your citizens, they will live under your rule. Azerbaijan had its chance, but cultural and religious harassment is not a good way to keep your citizens.

by: tiraniyaya son
October 25, 2009 06:48
Aliyev proposed to sell the natural gas for cheap prices as a gesture to Turkey. He knew that natural gas was their weak point at the time. He gave away Azerbaijanian national resources as if it was his pocket money that he could give away as a tip.

by: tiraniyaya son
October 25, 2009 06:43
As to the natural gas price. Turkey did not force Azerbaijan to sell the natural gas for this price to them. I remember when Heydar Aliyev (the Holy father) went to Turkish television and announced in an interview that they might sell natural gas to Turkey for cheap. Turks got all excited because they were buying natural gas for very expensive prices from Russia. By the way, they still buy most of their natural gas from Russia.

by: tiraniyaya son
October 25, 2009 06:41
The thing that many foreigners fail to see is that Azerbaijani government, that totally controls Azerbaijani foreign policy, cares about one thing only, staying in power. Whenever it does seem to protect the interests of Azerbaijan it is only to look good in the eyes of its public.
During the Turkey-Armenia game Azerbaijanian flags were not allowed to the stadiuam and there was a photo leaked of confiscated Azerbaijanian flags carried in a bin. Aliyev used this as an excuse to pull down all Turkish flags in the country. Even the one over the memorial of Turkish soldiers who died saving Azerbaijanians in 1918. Could there be a bigger insult to Turkey? The reason cited was that Azerbaijanian law allows foreign flags only over foreign missions. Where was that law till now?
For a few years now Aliyev was trying to decrease the influence of Turkey over Azerbaijan. Forbidding Turkish language on national TV channels and canceling broadcast of a Turkish TV channel were all in line with that goal. And he used the latest developments as an opportunity to rally Azerbaijanian nationalism against Turkey. He doesn't want his citizens to be loyal to the Turkic identity. He wants them to be loyal to their Azerbaijanian identity, and to its authoritarian leader, himself. And Azerbaijanian public is unbelievably naive and easy to play with, they took the bait.
Turkey even promised that they won't ratify the agreements until there is progress on Karabakh. Somehow they were led to believe that Karabakh issue is close to resolution. But Aliyev would never be able to get everything that the public wants in the Karabakh issue and that is why the status quo is his best option.
The reason of the so-called balanced approach where Azerbaijan has good relations with both Russia and West (and Iran) is to make sure that no one threatens their regime. Somehow they came to the conclusion that Turkey is the nation that they don't need to place nice with. And apparently they are right. After all that Azerbaijan did Turkey runs to Azerbaijan to try to fix relations. Besides, once a new government comes to power in Turkey they can blame everything on previous government and start playing anew.
Russia on the other hand has a government that will probably stay in power for a long time. And they can guarantee to Aliyev a support for his regime and a safe heaven once Aliyev decides to leave the power. And for that, Aliyev would do almost everything that they ask.
    Next 
Comments page of 3
TEXT SIZE - +

Most Popular

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile