Monday, February 13, 2012


Features

European Intellectuals Warn Of Democracy Crisis 20 Years After Berlin Wall's Fall

The conference was organized by former Czech President Havel's foundation
x
The conference was organized by former Czech President Havel's foundation
TEXT SIZE - +
By Gregory Feifer
PRAGUE -- Public cynicism and corruption in politics are threatening democracy in Europe.

That's according to a group of writers and scholars taking part in a conference today marking the 20th anniversary of the democratic revolutions that swept Central and Eastern Europe in 1989.

"Freedom and Its Adversaries" was organized by a foundation headed by former Czech President Vaclav Havel.

Speaking on a panel about Central Europe, French political scientist Jacques Rupnik said that following the collapse of communism, people found themselves freer than ever before.

"We have a freedom where people feel there's less intrusion in their lives," he said, "but they have very little influence on the government and on public affairs."

Rupnik said the idea inherited from communism that "the state is the enemy of freedom" has helped make Eastern Europeans indifferent to politics.

That, he said, has enabled politicians to use the "free market" as a codeword for "plunder and unrestrained greed." Now, Rupnik said, political leaders have begun "using the language of freedom while discarding civil society and the rule of law."

"So we have the democratic shell, the institutional shell," he said, "but it's hollow, the substance has been emptied. Yes, we have created the market economy, but it is in crisis."

Adam Michnik, editor of the Polish newspaper "Gazeta Wyborcza," agreed that Eastern European states are "hollow" in terms of liberal values. But he said authoritarian regimes in Cuba, Iran, and Russia have led him to believe the emptiness has been filled by something else that also threatens Europe.

"What is the trap in freedom?" he said. "I believe it is the corruption that is a permanent part of the state structure."

Michnik singled out Russia's authoritarian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who he says uses slogans such as "sovereign democracy" to justify imposing his rule on the country.

Russian political analyst Andrei Piontkovsky agreed, saying Russia is "run and owned by dedicated enemies of freedom." He warned of a "tremendous and widespread" misunderstanding of Russia in the West.

"This system is evolving not in the direction of postindustrial open society," he said, "but in the direction of feudalism, when a suzerain distributed and could take at any moment back land to his vassals. The only difference is that Mr. Putin is distributing and taking back not land, but gas and oil companies."

Obama's Reset

Piontkovsky said European countries dealing with Russian energy companies risk betraying their own people.

He also raised U.S. President Barack Obama's attempt to "reset" relations with Russia. He warned the policy would have no effect on Russian leaders' need to vilify the West as a threat to Russia in order to justify their "regime of kleptocracy."

"No resettings would change these fundamentals," he said. "They will always need the West as an enemy."

Piontkovsky said Russia has unleashed "especially vicious attacks" against neighbors that have chosen a "European way of development, the road to freedom: Georgia and Ukraine."

The best way to help Russia, Piontkovsky said, is by supporting democracy in Georgia and Ukraine. But that, he said, is being blocked by the "stupidity of European institutions."

British playwright Tom Stoppard warned that public indifference threatens to gradually destroy democracy not only in the former Soviet bloc, but also in some of the oldest democracies such as England.

"We've got used to an assumption which no longer holds," he said, "and it is that freedom gets lost and possibly regained in overnight acts of great drama and possibly violence. The problem now is that freedom gets lost by a thousand cuts. And it gets lost invisibly, inaudibly, and almost imperceptibly."

Stoppard said people must counter the build-up of authoritarian power with "a sense of responsibility toward one's neighbors."

The panel's moderator, British historian Timothy Garton Ash, summed up by echoing a common point: after 1989, Eastern Europe's postcommunist regimes mistakenly favored speed of reform over substance.

"I remember vividly when we set out after 1989, we had a kind of holy trinity," he said. "We always said 'democracy, market economy, and civil society.' And that was absolutely right, but there was one missing, which was an explicit emphasis on the rule of law."

Garton Ash said the result is that corruption today is "poisoning the air of freedom." Reestablishing rule of law, he said, is one of the key tasks facing Eastern Europe today.
When The Wall Came Down
Revolutions Of '89
In the fall of 1989, a singular wind of change swept across the continent, blowing down the Iron Curtain and revealing the public's yearning for freedom. Click here for RFE/RL's look back at the year communism collapsed.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Sergey from: USA
November 14, 2009 22:30
"The best way to help Russia, Piontkovsky said, is by supporting democracy in Georgia and Ukraine. But that, he said, is being blocked by the "stupidity of European institutions."

With all due respect to Andrei Piontkovsky, this is just another liberal nonsense. How supporting corrupt and malfunctioning "democracies" in Ukraine and Georgia will help Russia ? And help in what direction-- for Russia to become just another malfunctioning "democracy". It is time to recognize for Eastern European and Russian public intellectuals that "democracy" is just another utopia. Majorities of people cannot, will not and are not able/not qualified to run the countries effectively--it is always has been, is and will be a minority who run countries (or corporations). We may talk about civil rights and restrictions of state powers over individual or group of individuals, but let's first get back to reality and move away from democratic mythology that simply replaced communist one. In order to build a happy, tranquil, just and decent society, it is necessary to have a system that is based on realities about human nature--not on some utopias (communist or democratic).

by: Sergey from: New York, USA; Ukrain
November 15, 2009 01:04
It's not an honest article. There is no "'democracy, market economy, and civil society", not in EU, not in US. If you can pay for legal..., you have democracy, if not - you have to ask for a pardon for what you told if that was heard.
I asked few Germans about the change: they are in support, but when asked for examples: "we can travel now, but the rest is not good" (human values, jobs, family, culture, no any surance in tomorrow). 95% people are happy at any political society they used to. Only those "cultural" levels play the game of abstract "freedoms" to gain power or satisfuction regardless of other's lives. This is what the articl calls for - give your lives for their vision of "fedom" they can buy or got. Others do not matter for the author's "society"

by: Alexandre. from: The Netherlands.
November 29, 2009 00:32
I desagree on Sergey opinion. He try to convince me about the similar reality between Stocholm and St. Petersburg...I am sorry for you Sergey, but both cityes are so close but too far from each others.
If you can't realize that diference that is your problem.
               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Cold Threatens Russian Fruit Crop

Latest Comment (4 total)

Konstantin: You probably are not a "Chechen", however,
There is indeed a warning from the ... More

Putin Won't Meet Election Monitors

Latest Comment (4 total)

Konstantin: You are talking about technical fearness of elections,
That is just formality to wich ... More

Homs: Syria's Epicenter Of Revolution, Reprisal

Latest Comment (2 total)

Sami: The pathetic thing is that Saudi's are asking for elections in all places ... More