Thursday, February 16, 2012


Features

Postelection Crisis Hinders Afghan Quest For Stability

Presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah watches over Afghans from a campaign billboard in Kabul in early August.
TEXT SIZE - +
By Abubakar Siddique
Afghanistan's presidential elections last month were expected to deliver a credible administration that would contribute to stabilizing the country.

Instead, the exercise threatens to turn into a crisis with potentially troubling consequences for Afghanistan, NATO, and the region as a whole.

With over 90 percent of the ballots tallied, that country's Independent Election Commission says incumbent President Hamid Karzai has received 54 percent of the vote -- exceeding the 50 percent he needs for outright reelection. The commission says his top challenger, Abdullah Abdullah, is a distant second with 28 percent.

But growing allegations of fraud now cloud the picture.

The United Nations-backed Electoral Complaints Commission says it is probing 762 allegations of serious fraud. Already, investigations by the UN commission have led the Afghan-run Independent Election Commission to annul results from 447 of 28,000 polling stations.

The UN commission's Canadian chairman, Grant Kippen, is upbeat but says it will take weeks before the process is complete.

"We are working very hard to get this done as quickly as possible," the UN commission's Canadian chairman, Grant Kippen, says. "I expect over the coming weeks that we will be dealing -- as the investigations pick up -- we will be dealing with these decisions much more rapidly. So I am optimistic."

But many observers believe the short-term prospects for Afghanistan are less rosy.

'Imposed Rulers'?

The Afghan election was expected to deliver a new administration that would work with its international partners to deliver improved governance and play its role in defeating the Taliban insurgency.

President Hamid Karzai has led the country since a UN-backed deal in late 2001.
Instead, the Afghan political elite is splitting into increasingly hostile camps, raising questions in Western capitals about what happens next.

"Overall, whatever side wins in this contest, the Afghan public is the loser because they couldn't choose their real representative in this presidential election," says parliamentarian Kabir Ranjbar, who supported former Finance Minister Ashraf Ghani in the presidential ballot. "The international community is to be blamed for this because during the past seven years they empowered rapacious warlords and imposed them as rulers on the Afghan people."

Ranjbar also blames both Karzai and Abdullah for helping establish what he calls a "warlord-dominated political system."

In the run-up to the election, Karzai mustered a formidable alliance of powerful warlords and regional strongmen on his side. Following the vote, as allegations of fraud have grown, Karzai's camp has increasingly used anti-Western nationalist rhetoric to rally its supporters.

Trading Barbs

Pro-Karzai analysts appearing on late-night Afghan state television now routinely condemn foreign interference in Afghanistan's elections. They often highlight critical reporting in U.S. and British media, citing them as evidence of foreign bias.

For his part, Ranjbar doesn't see much difference in the camp of Karzai's top challenger, Abdullah Abdullah, or among his supporters. They form a disparate alliance of Islamist ideologues, former mujahedin commanders, and Communist-era officials. There are plenty of fraud allegations being leveled against their camp as well.

The two sides now accuse each other of fraud and irregularities, and the recriminations have developed ethnic undertones as hawks from both sides portray themselves as protectors -- of Pashtuns in Karzai's case, and of Tajiks in Abdullah's case.

Both sides include leaders from virtually all ethnicities and linguistic groups, but there are concerns that damage is being done.

Foreign Angst

While the domestic crisis brews, international unease over the situation in Afghanistan is growing. Domestic political pressures and concerns over the direction of the international stabilization effort in Afghanistan have forced British, German, and French leaders to call for a strategic rethink on Afghanistan.

With support for the Afghan war declining among the U.S. public, President Barack Obama's administration faces a delicate balancing act.

ISAF commander U.S. General Stanley McChrystal
Analysts suggest that a new strategic review by the top U.S. and NATO military commander in the country, General Stanley McChrystal, could pave the way for committing more troops to the country.

Ranjbar says resolving Afghanistan's complex security problems can only begin if Afghans have confidence in their own government.

"If a government lacks popular backing, all the militaries in the world cannot bring peace and stability to that country," Ranjbar says. "Of course it is impossible to place a tank on each doorstep. Therefore, I reiterate that the best solution is reforming the administration."

How to do that in the current stalemate is unclear.

Another outspoken Afghan parliamentarian, Shukaria Barakzai, urges patience and caution.

Barakzai tells RFE/RL that the political crisis in Afghanistan won't be resolved until a credible government and a genuine peaceful opposition emerge from the process.

And this, she says, will require robust political parties who are different from their ideological and militarized prototypes of the recent past.

RFE/RL's Radio Free Afghanistan Correspondent Salih Muhammad Salih contributed reporting
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: zaman from: Sydney, Aust
September 10, 2009 04:50
With the massive fraud claims against president Karzi, the entire democratic process is in question. In my view, a change is needed afghanistan. The new administration must carry the will of the Afghan people, curb corruption and provide security to Afghans.

regards,

Zaman Hakim

by: kharan from: kharan
September 12, 2009 18:34
The same crises emerged in the previous election but it was stopped before it came in to surface but why this time it is still working, in my opinion the west is ready to war but afraid off casualties and it is impossible if u go to war and be unharmed but the real problem is that the enemy only wants to hear the sound that west had gone after that the results are better known to every one chaos and alas like their predecessor Russian have done.

by: Mr. Alex W from: Toronto
September 13, 2009 02:11


Hello

I have seen it better being an NGO worker for 3 years in Kabul and Herat I found this to be true; democratic election seems not to be working well amongst Afghans.



Anyways before leaving for Afghanistan I did 1 and half year of research and trying to learn almost everything including their language Dari, ok i admit i am not that perfect but i can understand fully but need help in terms of responding. Now here after being away 3 years, what I found in our Book shelfs seems to be useless, and more like childrens drawing books. I like many other westerners working in Afghanistan have this view that being there and listening to local Afghans from their own mouth and expressing their feels, eyes to eyes, and, Face to face can never be compared with Books from 3rd party and specially if there has little research been done. We as westerners must closer invastigate and rise many questions to which we can help Afghans better.

Lets start from defining Afghans and know their roots, history, and their ways of thinking, culture etc.

Afghans have:

* 2 class of people, caucasian, and Altaic.

* 3 Lingustic groups Pashtu/Farsi/Turkic

* In Afghanistan you are either an Afghan or a non-Afghan.
-The ones calling themselves Afghan make up 75% of Afghanistan is made of 3 groups 42% Pashtuns, 20% Farsiwans, and 8%Pashias,

- non-Afghans 25% are those of 9% Hazara, 5% Uzbek, 7% Tajik, 3%Hindus/Sikhs/Kyrgiz/Turkmans/Aimaks/Qazalbash/Arab/Thymuri and Jamshidi.

* 11 major tribes (70% of the tribes speak Pashtu which altogether makes up 42% of the national population, and 30% ends up as Farsiwans which by Russian defination in 1953 classified these Dari speaking Afghans as "Tajik" By which many Farsiwans disagree, however because they don't speak Pashtu and aside from their last name and tribal roots which has no meaning in western social society it doesn't make sense to include them as Pashtuns if they don't speak Pashtu.

Those Tajiks whom in 1939 used to be 7% of the total population now enjoy fame jumbed to 27% thanks to addition of Afghan root of Dari speakers. The addition of Afghan Dari speakers into "Tajik" an ethnic immigrants native of Turkistan which came into Afghanistan during Early Russian invasion of Turkistan, altogether creates many difficulties to define Afghans and further confussion for many generations to come.

by: Ms. Shabnam from: Polikhumri, Baghlan
September 14, 2009 09:52
There is need for the disterbution of power among elected people from Pashtoon and Tajik because without disterbution of power it will not possible for one group to rule the country.
Karzai and Dr. Abdullah both are have the vote of the people so it is better for them to share the power equally as president and prime Minister otherwise the porblem will go ahead.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Strikes Target Militants In NW Pakistan

Latest Comment (1 total)

shakil: usa killed innosent people kids and women............ shame More

Euro Parliament Criticizes Russia Vote

Latest Comment (1 total)

rick: EU ....

they doesn't practise what they preaches More

Jolie In Sarajevo For Film Screening

Latest Comment (13 total)

rick: modesty of a person

is also measured

by problems that believes she can overcome .


I ... More