map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

'Berlin Wall's Lessons For Today'

In an op-ed for "USA Today," Jeffrey Gedmin discusses RFE and the role of free media in societies living under repressive regimes. More
More Articles

Features

Russia-West Dispute Over Georgia Roils UN

Russian envoy Vitaly Churkin at the August 28 meeting

August 29, 2008
By Nikola Krastev
Russia and Western powers have traded bitter accusations over the recent conflict in Georgia in a showdown at the UN Security Council that comes amid mounting acrimony over Moscow's actions in that neighboring state.

Three of the council's five permanent members -- France, Britain, and the United States -- appear to be stepping up pressure on fellow permanent member Russia, which has occupied wide swaths of Georgia and recognized claims of independence by separatists in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

It was the council's sixth emergency session on the crisis in Georgia, where Russian troops mounted an overwhelming counterattack to prevent Tbilisi from restoring control of South Ossetia.

The meeting was marked by sharp exchanges between the U.S. and Russian ambassadors, reflecting rising tensions as concerns grow at the prospect of a new Cold War.

U.S. Deputy Ambassador Alejandro Wolff accused Russia of shirking its commitments and obligations by recognizing the South Ossetian and Abkhaz leadership's assertion of independence.

"Russia's decision to recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia in contravention of its own commitments and obligations could portend further disregard of this institution [the Security Council] and its undertakings by one of its permanent members," Wolff said. "This should be a source of concern and reprobation not only for the members of the council but for every member of the United Nations whose charter requires that all member states should refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state."

Since the UN debate, Deputy Foreign Minister Grigol Vashadze has announced that Georgia will cut diplomatic ties with Russia over the Kremlin's recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

'Irresponsible' Behavior

Russian officials have repeatedly invoked Western recognition of Kosovo's independence from Serbia since major hostilities began in Georgia early this month.

But Russia's ambassador to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, on this occasion pointed to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, belittling Washington's response to the Georgia conflict as evidence of hypocrisy.

"I would like to say that I really liked the statement of the U.S. permanent representative, who was reminding to the members of the Security Council that states must refrain from the use of force or from the threat of use of force," Churkin said. "I would like to ask the honorable representative of the United States: Have you found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, or are you still looking for them?"

President George W. Bush's administration had argued that the invasion of Iraq was necessary to thwart Saddam Hussein's efforts to gird his brutal regime with nuclear and other weapons.

Jean-Pierre Lacroix, France's deputy representative to the UN, condemned Russia's "irresponsible" decision to recognize the two Georgian enclaves as independent states.

"The resolutions of the Security Council cannot be challenged or indeed written off by military action in defiance of the UN Charter," Lacroix said. "In particular, the territorial integrity of a [UN] member state reaffirmed repeatedly by an unanimous council cannot be undermined by a sudden armed intervention by a neighboring state."
French President Sarkozy (left, with President Medvedev on August 12) finds himself in an awkward position.

Privately, diplomats at the UN say that France has found itself in a particularly difficult position. On August 12, French President Nicolas Sarcozy and his Russian counterpart, Dmitry Medvedev, signed a "six-principles" cease-fire agreement that was initially viewed as a face-saving path to resolving the military standoff. Two weeks later, with troops still occupying a unilaterally defined buffer zone around Georgia's breakaway republics and dug in around a major Georgian port, Moscow disregarded the agreement and recognized South Ossetian and Abkhaz independence.

France is the current holder of the rotating EU Presidency and has cautioned Russia that the bloc might introduce economic sanctions against Moscow at an emergency session on September 1.

It appears that frustration within the council is deepening, with little prospect of an early, mutually acceptable solution.

"By its actions, Moscow has effectively ruled out agreements on a comprehensive council response to the situation in Georgia," Britain's UN Ambassador John Sawers said. "Russia's military action and its recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia [represent] a unilateral attempt to redraw the borders of a neighboring country through the use of force. It is our view that it is entirely unacceptable and unjustified."

Russia, whose veto power allows it to block any resolution, has repeatedly said it can wait as long as necessary.

Before the latest UN session on Georgia, the current Security Council president, Belgian Ambassador Jan Grauls, announced there would be no participation by Abkhaz and South Ossetian representatives, as was reportedly expected. He expressed hope that the issue would be resolved at a "more opportune moment and under a formula to be decided."

Critics of Abkhaz and South Ossetian participation in the council's sessions -- including from France, Britain, and the United States -- say such a move would grant their breakaway leaders a degree of legitimacy. Russia, on the other hand, has long complained that Washington is exploiting a technical loophole by not issuing visas to those representatives so they cannot attend meetings at the UN headquarters in New York.

Back In Georgia

For years, Russia has granted residents of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Russian citizenship and considerable support in the form of pensions and other financial incentives.

From the outset, President President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin have described Russia's military intervention as an attempt to "protect the lives and dignity of Russian citizens" and prevent "a genocide against the Ossetian people," "enforce peace in accordance with the UN Charter."

Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) Director Aleksandr Bortnikov on August 11 added the allegation that "Georgian security services had been actively carrying out intelligence activities...on the territory of the Russian Federation...and were preparing terrorist acts on Russian territory."

The Kremlin has also drawn a distinction between Georgian sovereignty and its "territorial integrity," which Medvedev said "as a rule, represents the real state of affairs."

Medvedev also suggested the results of the conflict, and indeed of the cease-fire deal brokered by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, should include a referendum or another determination on the question of independence for South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Ambassador Alasania calls Russian claims questioning the breakaway republics' legal status "absolutely groundless"
Tbilisi's UN envoy, Irakli Alasania, sought at the UN meeting on August 28 to ward off any perception that the legal status of Georgia's breakaway republics was unclear under international law.

"All claims of the Russian Federation that Georgia's international legal status was defined in disregard of the will of the Abkhaz and Ossetian people are absolutely groundless," Alasania said. "The 1991 referendum was held throughout the entire territory of Georgia including Abkhazia and South Ossetia.”

Russian forces remain deployed in Georgia outside those breakaway republics in a unilaterally defined buffer zone as well as outside the port of Poti.

Poti's deputy mayor, Gela Lagvilava, has told RFE/RL Georgian Service correspondent Tea Absaridze that local officials expect those Russian forces to withdraw by the end of the day, although there are no signs at Russian checkpoints of preparations for a pullout.
     
Comments
by: Greg from: Manhattan, New York, USA
August 29, 2008 21:27
It has been argued that at the time of the Russian revolution there were perhaps as many Ukrainian speaking people in the Czardom as their were Russaphones. Not only was Ukraine mostly inhabited by Ukrainophones, but also areas such as the Kuban and significant parts of the Caucasus. First under Czars and then Commissars, Ukrainians speaking people have been subjected to an ongoing policy of Russification, including through mass deportation of Ukrainians from their ancestral homelands and Russians taking their place. The large scale deportation of Ukrainian men, women, and children to central and Northern Asian regions resulted in mortality rates of +50% per year. According to Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Nobel Prize winning book – Gulag Archipelago - Ukrainians were executed and deported in disproportionate numbers to the Soviet Gulag (penal) system – most of whom never returned to their native Ukraine.
It is perhaps the three artificial famines orchestrated by Moscow which killed the most Ukrainians. The famine of 1932 – 1933 affected Ukraine, and Ukrainian speaking parts of the Soviet Union at a genocidal rate of + 25%. It is estimated that from 7 – 10 million Ukrainians, including 3 million children perished in that 20 month period. Today, the Russian Federation which claims to be the legal successor to the Soviet Union either completely denies that there was a Ukrainian genocide in the period or simply states that “many peoples in the Soviet Union suffered, and not just Ukrainians”. Ukrainian President Yuschenko has declassified millions of documents of that era which confirm what Ukrainian scholars had stated for years – that Ukraine and Ukrainian speaking people were specifically targeted in the Holodomor (famine genocide) in 1932 – 1933. When still president of Russia, Vladimir Putin refused to declassify Russian Federation archives from that period of time in spite of numerous requests from the Ukrainian government to do so.
During the past 90 years Ukrainians have been subjected to calculated Russian policy of genocide as defined by United Nations as either the extermination or forces loss of an ethnicity and replacement with another (Russification of Ukrainians) . The most significant loss was the Holodomor genocide of 1932 – 1933. This fall president Yuschenko of Ukraine will be commemorating the 75th anniversary of this most grim period of Ukrainian history. I trust that the Radio Free Europe will provide some coverage of this event to help North Americans better understand the evil that lies in Prime Minister Putin’s head. He was quoted as stating “that the loss of the Soviet Union was the worst geopolitical tragedy of the 20th Century”. He was also recently quoted in Belgrade as stating “that Ukraine is not a real country and that he would rip it apart if they tried to join Nato”.
Thank you.
     
TEXT SIZE - +

Editors' Picks

Arresting Images

Photos Of The Week Photogallery

President Van Rompuy

'How's That Again?!' Audio

Karzai Inauguration

The Anticipation Of Change Video

Follow Us On Twitter

Keep up-to-date on all the latest news from RFE/RL's broadcast region by following us on Twitter:
~ You can find our instant news feed at @RFE_RLNEWS.
~ An obsessive Kremlin watcher? Follow our blog at @PowerVertical.
~ Human rights abuses chronicled at @RightsWatchdog.
~ News, comment, and the odd silly dictator story at @TransmissionRFE.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile