map
Our Affiliates
Listen In 28 LanguagesRFE/RL Radio
In 28 Languages

"World Changing Radio"

CNN International reports on RFE/RL's role in Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution, and its continuing mission to spread free media More
More Articles

Features

Russian Patriarch's Visit Creates Storm In Ukraine

An Orthodox priest blesses demonstrators protesting against Patriarch Kirill's visit to Ukraine.

July 31, 2009
By Claire Bigg
Some see him as their spiritual father. Others say he is merely doing the bidding of his Kremlin masters.

Patriarch Kirill, the head of the powerful Russian Orthodox Church, is in Ukraine on a ten-day visit that has once again underscored the country's deeply ambivalent feelings toward Russia's main religious authority.

The Russian Orthodox Church retains formal authority over Ukraine's Orthodox Christians, but is losing growing numbers of faithful to Ukrainian splinter churches.

Kirill's arrival in Kyiv on July 27 unleashed passionate reactions.

Scuffles and heated arguments erupted as the patriarch prepared to hold a liturgy at one of Kyiv's churches on July 28.

One demonstrator condemned what he said was "the ongoing expansion of the Moscow Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church on Ukraine's Orthodox territory."

Nearby, a worshipper voiced her anger at the protesters' attempt to disrupt the prayers.

"I came here to pray, but these bastards are preventing me from doing so with their screams," she complained. "They are trying to discredit the Orthodox people, and this disgraceful behavior will be punished at the first occasion."

Disputed Motives

Kirill is on his first visit to Ukraine since being enthroned as patriarch in February following the death of his predecessor, Aleksy II.

The patriarch, aware of the deepening political tensions between the two ex-Soviet nations, has insisted that his 10-day tour of Ukraine is spiritual, not political.

But protester Oles Shevchenko, for one, is not convinced. Shevchenko, one of 5,000 demonstrators who marched against Kirill’s visit in Kyiv, believes the patriarch is in Ukraine to promote the Kremlin's agenda.

Ukrainian priests file past a picture of President Yushchenko as they protest Kirill's visit.
"This visit has nothing to do with religion. It is fully in line with the imperial policy of Kremlin," he said. "He has a KGB attitude. When he arrived, he said that 'everything here is ours, that for us there are no political borders.'"

Despite Kirill's assurances that his sole aim is to unite fractious Orthodox Christians, his latest statements have added fuel to the political, religious, and economic disputes pitting Ukraine against Russia.

Speaking on Ukrainian television on July 28, Kirill said Russians and Ukrainians were one and the same people and called on them not to sacrifice their values in the pursuit of closer ties with Europe -- a veiled jab at Ukrainian efforts to move away from Russia's orbit and join NATO.

Such comments are likely to anger many in Ukraine, who claim the Moscow Patriarchate is bent on undermining Ukraine’s independence from its former imperial master.

"The Moscow patriarchate is a church of Russian people, and we have a different state. Ukrainians are not Russians, and Ukraine is not Russia," Bishop Yevstrat Zorya, a spokesman for the Kyiv Patriarchate, told RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service.

During his three-day visit in Kyiv, Kirill also condemned attempts to "falsify" history, echoing earlier Kremlin criticism of Ukraine's campaign to have the Holodomor, a Stalin-era famine that killed millions of Ukrainians, recognized internationally as genocide.

The patriarch's itinerary, too, is raising eyebrows. He is currently visiting the Russian-speaking regions of eastern Ukraine before heading to the Crimean Peninsula, home to a majority Russian-speaking population and a mounting separatist movement.

Competing Churches

But what makes Kirill's visit most controversial is his claim to spiritual authority on Ukrainian territory -- an issue that has strong political overtones due to the Moscow Patriarchate's coziness with the Kremlin.

Orthodox Christianity, born from the 1054 Great Schism with Rome, is the dominant faith in Ukraine.

But the country's Orthodox Christians are split between parishes loyal to the powerful Moscow Patriarchate and an autonomous Ukrainian Orthodox Church that broke off from Moscow in the 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Moscow continues to consider the Kyiv Patriarchate schismatic.

Advocates of an independent Ukrainian church contend that while the Russian-backed church controls the majority of parishes in Ukraine, the country has more Orthodox faithful than Russia and deserves its own, separate church.

Ukraine's Western-leaning president, Viktor Yushchenko, has long urged Russia to formally grant independence to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate, which many Ukrainians regard as a key element of their nation's post-Soviet national identity.

He has sought the support of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople, the spiritual leader of the word's 250 million Orthodox believers, but has not received a clear response.

Yushchenko's renewed call for an independent Church during talks with Kirill Monday met with an icy rebuff.

"This Church already exists, Mr. President. It is the local Church of Ukraine, and if it did not exist, Ukraine would not exist today," Kirill hit back. "There is no imperialism here, no domination over others. There is only a clear Orthodox doctrine: the patriarch is everyone's father, regardless of the color of passports in people's pockets or the state in which they live."

The patriarch went on to describe Kyiv as the "southern capital of Russian Orthodoxy," and dismissed Ukraine's breakaway churches as "wounds" on the body of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Some Ukrainians, weary of the ongoing feuding between Russian and Ukrainian Orthodox Christians, have welcomed Kirill's message of unity.

Former deputy Inna Bohoslovska, now a candidate in the 2010 presidential election, said she was inspired by the religious service held by Kirill in Kyiv on July 27.

"If at least a few thousand people felt the way I did during the service, I'm sure this will be the biggest positive effect of this visit," she said. "The speculations and fights that surround Orthodoxy in Ukraine are a disgrace for our country."

Despite his strong following in Ukraine, Kirill will have trouble dispelling doubts about the motives behind his Ukrainian pilgrimage.

His visit comes as a resurgent Russia seeks to boost its influence on the international scene, including in the religious sphere. Russian political leaders have staunchly backed the Moscow Patriarchate's campaign to bring its foreign offshoots into the fold.

These efforts saw the formal reunification in 2007 of the Moscow church with its main dissident branch, the U.S.-based Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, whose founders fled Bolshevik rule almost a century ago.

RFE/RL's Ukrainian and Russian Services contributed to this report.
This forum has been closed.
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 3
by: Michael Averko
August 22, 2009 08:32
Regarding this below excerpt:

"The Kyivan Patriarchate was transferred to the Patriarch of Moscow (from Constantinople) in the 17th century. This was done for political reasons and involved bribery and tactics that are unacceptable under church teaching. It's time to correct this abominable political manouevre by reinstituting the Kievan Patriachate and recognizing it as canonical."

*****

Some substantiation is requested over blanket statements which aren't in agreement with how many in present day Ukraine see the situation.

In the latter days of Rus before the Mongol period, Moscow was developing at a greater rate than Kiev. After the Mongol occupation perid, Moscow emerged as the leading city of the Rus state. This reality played a role in the transfer.

by: Michael Averko
August 13, 2009 10:55
The ROC-MP isn't the only religious entity that can be accused of "playing politics."

Filaret/UOC-KP can be accused of the same.

I brought up the other countries because it was earlier (at this thread) suggested that Ukraine is the only predominately OC country without having a patriarchate on its territory formally acknowledged by the OC authorities in Istanbul.

Regarding the mention of Putin, a recent poll in Ukraine indicates that he would win the Ukrainian presidency against any Ukrainian or other global politician.

by: Michael Averko
August 12, 2009 17:14
As a follow-up to my last submission of comments (not yet posted as of this submission), another factor relates to the mentioned Kiev-Kyiv to Moscow transition.

The further limiting of Kiev's/Kyiv's influence was a result of the destruction it experienced during Mongol rule (a point noted by the Vatican's envoy to the Mongols, Plano Caprini, who bore witness to this aspect).

by: katya
August 12, 2009 16:29
Regarding Montenegro, Macedonia, Moldova and Belarus-- Each country has its own complex set of political and religious struggles. Citing the lack of canonically accepted Orthodox Churches in these areas is irrelevant to the Ukrainian struggle. Ideally, and in a perfect world, all nations ought to have their own church (in communion with all the other Orthodox Churches)and I believe that Ukraine ought to be represented by her own Church. The Russian Church does play politics (among countless other things, Alexei II unabashedly supported Putin and his pro Russian agenda)and does not represent the Ukrainian nation.

by: Michael Averko
August 12, 2009 15:54
Katya

Kyiv/Kiev was losing ground as the newer city center Moscow was developiong. I don't think it's accurate to attribute this solely on the idea of a conniving Moscow over a virtuous Kiev/Kyiv. Other parts of the world have seen shifts of power that can include changes in where the given capital is located.

Patriarch Kirill, the UOC-MP agree that there's an existing relationship that should continue.

Are you against this continued relationship on the grounds of Moscow as primary locale of the patriarchate, or are you against any such togetherness altogether?

It seems like Kirill and Yushchenko are of one mind on having just one OC in Ukraine, albeit with their disagreement on a main point.

The way I see it, the UOC-MP doesn't seem like it's going to just fade away anytime soon. This has to do with how many in Ukraine (as opposed to Russia) feel.

Modern day Russia, Ukraine and Belarus are descended from the same Rus state. Over time, differences developed. This having to do with the large geographic stretch and the periods of extended and different occupations.

On your "inferiority" point, this matter has been applied when contrasting other situations between the more rural areas with the less rural ones.

I take it that I'm apparently right about what I said about the instances of the OC status in Macedonia (FYROM), Moldova and Montenegro, as well as Belarus. If so, then the discussed situation in Ukraine doesn't stand alone.

Offhand and overall, I'm not sure that the OC are anymore less prone to accepting change than the RC.




by: katya
August 12, 2009 14:15
Michael, changes in primary cities (as you say --Kyiv to Moscow) don't determine changes in patriachates or metropolitanates. Constantinople is now officially Istanbul according to the political map, but it retains its honourable position. Antioch, Alexandria,...are still important spiritual centres. Not to mention, the shift from Kyiv to Moscow involved bribery and intrigue. It was not done to represent a new spiritual reality. I would suggest that those who accept the Moscow Patriarchate do so out of respect for the status quo; in religious matters, Orthodox are hesitant to accept change. Also the historical reality in Ukraine (under Russia) has resulted in some Ukrainians feeling culturally inferior.

by: Michael Averko
August 12, 2009 08:23
BTW, for the sake of being factual, beware of comments dubiously claiming that in Ukraine, the popularity of the UOC (MP) is well below that of the UOC (KP), while terming Russia unfriendly types as "patriots" and exclusively categorizing more pro-Russian elements as "chauvinistic."

by: Michael Averko
August 12, 2009 05:07
Katya

Offhand, If I'm not mistaken, Macedonia (FYROM), Montenegro, Moldova, along with Belarus don't have a patriarchate based in their respective country that's formally recognized by the OC authorities situated in Istanbul (formerly Constantinople).

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church affiliated with the Moscow Patriarchate takes into consideration the Ukrainian national identity along with prior history.

Your "anachronistic" point doesn't take into consideration how Moscow replaced Kiev/Kyiv as the primary city descended from the Rus period.

Many in Ukraine aren't in disagreement with the present situation. Others expresse the views which you seem to sympathize with.




by: katya
August 11, 2009 19:51
The Kyivan Patriarchate was transferred to the Patriarch of Moscow (from Constantinople) in the 17th century. This was done for political reasons and involved bribery and tactics that are unacceptable under church teaching. It's time to correct this abominable political manouevre by reinstituting the Kievan Patriachate and recognizing it as canonical.

by: katya from: ontario
August 11, 2009 13:25
It is anacronystic to place the Kyivan Patriarchate under Russia. The Kyivan Church is the original Church of Ukraine and all of Rus. Ukraine deserves its own Church to allow for the religious expression of the Ukrainian people within Orthodoxy. Ukrainians are not looking for schism. All nations in Europe have their own National Churches. This is how Orthodoxy is organized--why not Ukraine then?
    Next 
Comments page 1 of 3
TEXT SIZE - +

Multimedia

Editors' Picks

'Religious Hatred'

Russia Buries Slain Priest Photogallery

President Van Rompuy

'How's That Again?!' Audio

Arresting Images

Photos Of The Week Photogallery

Follow Us On Twitter

Keep up-to-date on all the latest news from RFE/RL's broadcast region by following us on Twitter:
~ You can find our instant news feed at @RFE_RLNEWS.
~ An obsessive Kremlin watcher? Follow our blog at @PowerVertical.
~ Human rights abuses chronicled at @RightsWatchdog.
~ News, comment, and the odd silly dictator story at @TransmissionRFE.

Products and services:

RSSMail SubscriptionMobile