Saturday, May 26, 2012


Chaikhana

How Should Russia Deal With Central Asia?

Pro-democracy activists gather on Tahrir Square in Cairo in April
x
Pro-democracy activists gather on Tahrir Square in Cairo in April
TEXT SIZE - +
Will the ongoing popular uprisings in Arab countries spread to Central Asia and what role should Russia play in the region? 

The topics were high on Russian lawmakers' agenda this week during the State Duma's special hearing, "Central Asia: Strategic Partnership and Security Issues."

The situation in Central Asia is of "extreme concern" said lawmaker Aleksei Ostrovskiy, who pointed out similarities between the former Soviet region and the Arab countries experiencing popular revolts.

"The rate of the population growth in Central Asia is the same as in Egypt, and most of the population lives in poverty," Ostrovskiy said. According to Ostrovskiy, it was labor migration to Russia that has prevented a "social explosion" in Central Asia.

Shortly before the hearing, Ostrovskiy has warned that situation in Central Asia has a direct impact in Russian national interests, as it poses threats of cross-border crimes, drug trafficking, arms smuggling, terrorism, and illegal migration. 

During the Duma hearing, Ostrovskiy suggested that Russia should try to prevent "any negative scenario" in Central Asia, playing the role of the "guarantor of stability in the region." Grigory Karasin, a deputy foreign minister, however, suggested Russia is not seeking any "exceptional role in Central Asian affairs."

Karasin said the threat of drug trafficking and extremism from neighboring Afghanistan adds to Central Asia's growing political, social, and economic problems. As a way to avert any potential "Arab scenario" in the region, the Russian diplomat called for democratic changes and reforms.

As for those democratic changes and reforms, lawmaker Semyon Bagdasarov suggests all those decisions should be left to governments in Central Asia as it is "their internal affair."

The lawmaker told RFE/RL's Turkmen Service that Russia should only focus on specific issues connected to its national security, such as the fight against drug trafficking and terrorism in the region.

Bagdasarov said he was against Russia getting involved in Central Asian countries' domestic affairs, adding that was what the West does. It wants to change the situation in other countries without actually knowing the real state of affairs on the ground and usually ends up destabilizing it, he said.

-- Farangis Najibullah
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Aftab Kazi from: Washington, DC
April 25, 2011 21:27
Sirs: Why your correspondent do not report events, which might through an enlightened light on what is going on in Central Asia? Recently an important conference in Tashkent gathered to discuss achievements over the last 20 years of independence, and need for further reforms went unreported. We also need analyses about what goes on positively in terms of achievemjents under the ongoing systamatic models of reformation in most CA countries. Several of your authors and large Western media have criticized the Andijon incident of May 2005 with self-created information accusing the Karimov government of killing thousand(s), when scholarly studies (Akiner, Daly, and even late Abdul Rehman Polat, an opposition figuire, who was commissioned by the Jamestown Foundation to write an objective analysis od the Andijon events t concluded excatly the same what Akiner and Daly already did that the casuality figures reported by the Uzbekistan government are correct. Why double standards? Even "highly respected" human rights organizations publicize controvertial viewpoints. All human rights organizations criticize the rise of extremism and terrorism equally disturbing the liberal/secular CA states, our policy-makers HROs continue to criticize even the best intentioned steps being taken by these governments to fight extremiusm. Until we are not able to balance our intentions, motivations vis-a-vis our policies, what best could come out of our campaign in Afgnaistan and broader CA? "Power politics" is understandable, which to a certain extent might support our policies, but un-connstrued policies work against the common sense. We are in trillions of dollars in debt, which cannot be balanced with the conquest of several rich countries (minus expenses on wars). Wish-to-do policies at this juncture violate the the limitsof power context. As a scholar, I hold a high regard for our U.S. leaders and ideals of our government yet feel surprized that the common sense is lacking in our overall policies towards Eurasia and Central Asia. If we treated these countries as customners, we are to be treated the same, despite our military might and prestige. I have come to conclude that at least half of our problems are our self-created. Let us respect respect their systematic models of reformation adapted by CA governments than demanding for an overnight socioeconomic reform. The way their operating models are working, in a few decades CA states might be telling us that our models of fast democratization/reform were not suitable to theior conditions. I suggest balanced policies considering the various operatinmg levels of their political cultures.

About This Blog

Chaikhana is a blog that re-creates the atmosphere of open debate, spirited conversation, and friendly banter that has tied communities together throughout Central Asia for centuries. The only thing missing in our teahouse will be the rattling of teacups as RFE/RL correspondents Farangis Najibullah and Bruce Pannier lead the discussion on all things Central Asia.

Most Recent Posts

No records found for this widget:3976