Saturday, May 26, 2012


Features

Islamization A Catch-22 For Pakistani Military

Pakistani troops walk on a hilltop post near Ladha, a town in the tribal region of South Waziristan in May 2011
TEXT SIZE - +
By Abubakar Siddique, Abdul Hai Kakar
Muhammad Akram Afridi witnessed a transformation during his 28 years in the Pakistani military.
 
The retired colonel can remember when British imperial forces were emulated to the point that bagpipes, ballrooms, and whiskey went hand in hand with military service. At 64, he can recall when garrison bars were wet, and when they went dry.
 
Afridi, as a young officer in the 1970s, was surprised to see a small but significant number of his fellow servicemen openly consuming alcohol. After alcohol sales were banned, the practice moved inside private homes. 
 
Religious practices, he says, began to take a more prominent place in military life during General Mohammad Zia ul-Haq's reign as president from 1977 to 1988. "Zia's time came when all the mosques became active," he says. 
 
"Frankly people used to feel ashamed of going to the mosque [before that]. But I think, with Zia coming in, people started feeling proud about going to mosque," Afridi says.
 
Decades later, many believe the bridges to religious principles built under General Zia ul-Haq's rule has led to the Islamization of the military. The consequence, retired officers warn, is that the government's first line of defense against the threat of militant Islam could be compromised.
 
High-Profile Arrest

The recent arrest of a high-ranking officer on charges that he consorted with a banned Islamist organization has been held up by many observers as evidence of radicalization within the military's ranks.
 
Brigadier-General Ali Khan, who was arrested in early May, is accused of having links to the banned pan-Islamist organization Hizb-ut Tahrir. His lawyers have denied the charges and argue that he was arrested for harshly questioning the military's leaders.
 
Nevertheless, the case has heightened fears over the state of security in the nuclear-armed country, whose military plays a dominant role in political and economic matters.
 
The military, composed of a 600,000-strong army and other forces accounting for hundreds of thousands of officers, was established on a secular foundation with strong checks and balances intended to maintain discipline.

 
Retired Brigadier General Asad Munir says these mechanisms continue to alert military intelligence to any developments that could undermine the armed forces. But he also says that these checks and balances have been weakened by the changes ushered in by military dictator General Zia ul-Haq.
 
Zia ul-Haq's policies were intended to strengthen the Islamic character of Pakistani law and society, but in hindsight helped foster radical Islam. The vast majority of Pakistanis were observant Muslims, but Zia ul-Haq introduced numerous laws regulating public life. He encouraged Islamists from around the world to join the cause of Afghan rebels fighting against the Soviet Union, and hosted Afghan mujahedin on Pakistani soil.
 
Efforts were also made to emphasize the Islamic character of the military, whose motto was changed to "Islamic faith, Piety and Jihad in the Path of Allah." A new bureaucracy was set up to promote religious observance within the military. New mosques were constructed on garrison grounds. The number of clerics serving with the military soared. And while officers and soldiers were discouraged from joining political parties, their adherence to conservative proselytizing Islamic organizations was tolerated.
 
Munir, who also served in military intelligence, says that the leadership of the armed forces did attempt to roll back Zia ul-Haq's changes. The military, he says, was worried about the radicalization of subordinates equipped with lethal weapons and skilled in the ways of war. But they had no control over the proliferation of private jihadis within Pakistani society.
 
Retired officers agree that Pakistan is today fighting against a foe it helped create to serve as an extremist proxy. Munir says that since 9/11, Pakistani military leaders have realized the dangers posed by Islamic militants on Pakistani soil and are sincere in their efforts to confront them. "They [the military leaders] now sense that it's not the 1980s or 1990s, and now the whole world is watching Pakistan," he says. 
 
"Whenever a terrorist is arrested anywhere in the world, he is linked to Pakistan. So they cannot continue this policy of [keeping the jihadis as proxies]," Munir adds. "Even if the military wanted to keep them they would be pressured so much internationally that they would have to give in and finish off these elements."
 
Dancing And Booze

In a country created in the name of Islam, however, drawing such lines is very difficult.
 
Retired Brigadier-General Akhiyan Gul Khattak counts himself among the generation of officers who were overjoyed to see the Pakistani military's culture Islamize.
 
"We were not allowed to freely practice Islam in Pakistan, which was created in the name of a homeland for Muslims," he says.
 
A photograph released by the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) in February shows Pakistani army, police, and government officials offering prayers during a funeral service for soldiers

Resentment lingers over how, as a young cadet just a few years after Pakistan gained independence in 1947, he was forced to wear Western-style clothing and was ordered to refrain from discussing politics and religion. But what most offended his conservative worldview was dancing and alcohol -- hallmarks of the officer's life in the British colonial military in which many of Khattak's superior officers were trained.
 
He concedes that there might be individual extremists in the army today, but says that what outsiders might perceive as rising extremism or radicalization in the military is in fact increasing anti-Americanism. 
 
"We are saying that while America is a superpower, it doesn't mean that it can interfere in Afghanistan, Libya, Saudi Arabia," he says. "In Pakistan they are like a parasitic plant penetrating us."
 
Former Pakistani Brigadier General Saad Muhammad, however, is not impressed with the idea that radicalization within the military is anti-American at its core. 
 
He says that even anti-American sentiments are rooted in an extremist interpretation of Islam. Muhammad says that some Al-Qaeda leaders have been captured in the homes of Pakistani military officers or their close relatives, which illustrates the extent of radicalization within the security institutions. 
 
Muhammad says that the military cannot insulate itself from the current wave of extremism in Pakistan. "There is no magic wand to end such trends overnight," he says.
 
He remains optimistic. Muhammad points to the rising public criticism of military's role from its core support base in the eastern Punjab Province, which is also home to most of its officers and soldiers. He says that it might eventually lead to civilian control over the military and all Pakistani institutions working under their respective spheres. 
 
"[Civil and military leaders] cannot reject the popular pressure for a long time. People are now asking questions and they demand answers," he says.
This forum has been closed.
Comment Sorting
Comments
     
by: Dyx
July 03, 2011 14:41
"The retired colonel can remember when British imperial forces were emulated to the point that bagpipes, ballrooms, and whiskey went hand in hand with military service."
Why the imperial British forces were there first place? Did Pakistan attack the UK? When you wake up a sleeping dragon do not be upset that your rear is on fire.
In Response

by: Imran
July 04, 2011 01:08
Mr Dyx ! I would like to remind you that these were the British and their imperial Army which masterminded the whole scheme of the creation of Pakistan; a country which now includes more than half of the area which historically belonged to Afghans(Pashtuns) and Baloch nations. These were the British who occupied that land and then granted it to their loyalists who had always served their British masters so faithfully.
In Response

by: Chechnya
July 04, 2011 12:20
By sleeping dragon he meant China the term coined by Napoleon - the great ally of Pakistan. They already started manipulating the rare metal prices on the market. Of course they do not like the West to be near their borders which is Afghanistan and Pakistan. Just like with Russia they supply arms to mujaheddin to fight of the invasion off.

by: surrendermonkey from: US
July 04, 2011 03:41
Sleeping dragon? What chuzpah from a beggar nation with an army whose main attribute is to lose every war (all of them it started) and surrender en masse to . It is your rear that is on fire, and you lit it.

The British were there because you lost to them, and you slept quietly for over 200 years until you were handed your pathetic country on a platter by the same British who wanted an "ally" in the region. Some ally this!

Pakistan's army willingly adopted Islamicization and terrorism as their means to attain their goal of carving out a new Muslim empire in South Asia. The Catch is that their attempts have only hastened the inevitable dissolution of their failed state.
In Response

by: Chechnya
July 04, 2011 12:15
Hey monkeyman tell me which war did the USA win by itself? The war between the North and the South? Wait, not even that one England helped you there. How is your war in Afghanistan? I've heard Canada initiated cut and run plan before you. How sad.
In Response

by: Eugenio from: Vienna
July 04, 2011 19:19
Hi, Chechnya! I guess that "surrendermonkey" from US meant George W. Bush when he said "monkey" - no one in this world comes closer to monkeies than this specimen "born in the usa" :-). And as far as wars made in US go, I guess the one that will long be remembered is Vietnam - where the Uncle Ho kicked the grinos out of, and the second one is Afghanistan - where the Taliban are taking good care of the same :-).
In Response

by: Jacob Geller from: US
July 04, 2011 18:53
Well said, Surrender monkey! 20 years from now .. or maybe only 10 or even 5 years from now, the Pakistanis will be crying about the great betrayal from the Chinese, with whom the "friendship runs deeper than than the Atlantic and taller than the Everest!". They have become so used to begging, and so immune to seeing reality in their ridiculous obsession with India, that they are falling for the same trap all over again with this so called Chinese friendship .. and celebrating like fools!

by: Imran
July 04, 2011 22:11
In fact this is no catch-22 situation. Pakistan under the rule of the Punjabi establishment does have a fair solution to the issue of the imposed radicalization of the selected segments of the society. The only agenda behind the forced extremism was/is just to perpetuate Punjab's hegemony and legitimize the occupation of the land and resources of Pashtun and Baloch nations who don't historically belong to the indian subcontinent. Baloch were rather part of the Afghan confederacy.

Pakistan just needs to establish federation in its true spirit which was promised by the so-called founders of this country in their 1940 Lahore Resolution.

by: ZN from: London
July 05, 2011 11:49
http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Opinions/Columns/29-Jun-2011/Dreams-of--colonels-coup

My father is a senior officer, i have been raised 24 years in the military circle, and these anti pak military articles are mere rubbish. Trust one from within to speak out the truth (read article on top). Yes there is dance, yes there is alcohol, but nothing has ever been forced onto officers. The Pak Forces comprise a well balanced, and healthy population of officers.
First Iraq had WMD, then no, it was a humanitarian crisis under Saddams rule, then Afghanistan supposedly contained Osama, then no, it grows drugs and women suffer so it turns into somewhat a rescue/ humanitarian issue, Libyan president is a tyrant, you bomb it, then ofcourse, its turned a humanitarian issue, now Pakistan is the hub and it is rooted in the Pak Forces, so you start with steady drone attacks. What about the humanitarian crisis in Kosovo, Siberia, Palestine? What about the 1000s dead from the drone attacks, what about the regular deaths from the drone attacks?
No, you corrupt peoples mind with the media to create a smokescreen and attack from underneath. Every single US or British soldier who ever died is glorified by name, picture and family. What about the 1000's of CIVILIANS in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Kosovo? Is Muslim blood that cheap?
You generalize Muslims with insane terrorists, because it serves your purpose.
In Response

by: Keffir from: Australiastan
July 06, 2011 12:39
ZN says - "You generalize Muslims with insane terrorists, because it serves your purpose."

He cannot understand or accept that the only "insane terrorists" are in fact Muslims and this is not a generalisation. Sadly Muslim religion is being used to justify, sanctify and encourage the murder of innocent civillians, most of them Pakistani women and children. This is not coming from foreign conspiracies. The training grounds are madrassas where innocent young children are being brainwashed to commit suicide and murder their own kind for the benefit of their masters who are too cowardly to commit suicide themselves. Pakistan will never become a cohesive nation while they continue to allow these crime to continue. As is the case with all Muslim nations, Pakistan must learn to control Islam and not let Islam control it, because you are already seeing the benefits of that policy.
In Response

by: ZN from: London
July 06, 2011 16:06
He cannot understand or accept that the only "insane terrorists" are in fact Muslims and this is not a generalisation.

Ask any literate Muslim, and he will tell you that these cowardly acts are not taught in Islam. When you take an illiterate person and put them infront of a religion, they will see it from a different perspective. Give it to a well educated one, and he will derive the right meaning.
If you look at destitute illiterate people who have no knowledge or sense, and from them generalize billions of other Muslims, then the dialogue really just ends here Keffir.
There is no point of controlling or being controlled by religion. Islam, like any other religion, is ' a way of life', not something you control.
These madrassas, are housing orphans, or children whose parents have no means to support them. Take a 4 year old child, and feed them crazy ideas, and they will obviously grow into it.
Pakistan itself is not the pioneer. This influx of extremism is greatly due to Afghanistan being attacked, and the civilians crossing the border into Pakistan. And this is where it spread. By 1988 (long before the US entered Afghanistan), 3.3 million refugees came into Pakistan.
The root cause is that of illiteracy and poverty.

by: MaGioZal from: São Paulo - SP - Brazil
July 05, 2011 20:17
Maybe the solution would be to return the Pakistani Army to return to its old good British traditions — including the non-prohibition of music, dance and alcoholic beverages. I bet Jinnah would approve.

by: Imran from: Peshawar
July 17, 2011 09:23
Terrorism in Pakistan and its exportation to the neighbouring countries has nothing to do with poverty and illiteracy. Pakistan in fact suffers from its shaky structure. British are mainly responsible for this unnatural arrangement named as Pakistan. To forge a false bond of cohesion it is inevitable for Pakistan to promote extreme religiousity thus to dissolve historical identities of nations who in fact didn't belong to the indian subcontinent. Terrorism is thus the outcome and manifestation of that hegemonic agenda to to cover up hegemony with a false religious bond which has been proved to be inadequate by the cessation of Bangaldesh.

Most Popular

               
 
 
 
 
Being Discussed Now

Kingsley As Karzai?

Latest Comment (1 total)

M: they put the dictators in power and they make fun of them More

Chechen Leader Names New Premier

Latest Comment (3 total)

M: No, Chechens are not Tatars, and judging by how they wipe out Russian ... More

Moldova Sentences 3 On Uranium Charge

Latest Comment (1 total)

Ionas Aurelian Rus:
One should not only salute the capture of these officials by the Moldovan ... More