If Iran Halts Enrichment, Bush Says He'll Consider Incentives

U.S. President George W. Bush (file photo) (epa) May 26, 2006 -- U.S. President George W. Bush said he could consider providing incentives to Iran if Tehran first agrees to halt uranium-enrichment work.
Bush, speaking at a joint White House news conference late yesterday with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, said it was up to Iran to decide if it wants to remain isolated by the world community because of its nuclear program.


"The Iranians walked away from the table. And I think we ought to be continuing to work on ways to make it clear to them that they will be isolated," he said. "And one way to do that is to continue to work together through the United Nations Security [Council]. If they suspend [enrichment] and have the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] in there, making sure that the suspension is real, then of course we'll talk about ways forward, incentives."


Bush reiterated that he hoped to resolve the dispute diplomatically.


Bush's comments came as the United States, Britain, Russia, China, France, and Germany have been seeking agreement on a package of incentives and possible sanctions that could be presented to Iran in a bid to persuade Tehran to halt uranium enrichment.


(AFP, Reuters)

What Would Sanctions Mean?

What Would Sanctions Mean?

Economic sanctions could further undermine Iran's already shaky economy (Fars)

MOVING TOWARD SANCTIONS: If the United Nations Security Council imposes sanctions on Iran, domestic support for Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad will wane, according to ALEX VATANKA, Eurasia editor for Jane's Information Group.
Vatanka told a February 24 RFE/RL briefing that "economic sanctions will hurt the average Iranian" and, consequently, many "will blame the ruling clerics" for making life difficult and "impairing the country's long term development."
Vatanka said sanctions would be a serious challenge to the Iranian government. If harsh economic sanctions were imposed, Iran's poorest population will be hurt the hardest -- and might react "as they did in the 1970s and protest in the streets." Sanctions on travel, Vatanka said, would hurt a many Iranians because "Iran is a nation of small traders" who depend on the ability to travel to earn an income. According to Vatanka, unemployment in Iran is estimated at 30 percent, "so small trading is essential to survival." Although current U.S. sanctions "haven't worked," he said, "Iranians fear an oil embargo." He stressed that "oil revenues are a major part of the economy, so it is critical to look at this sector."
Should negotiations with the European Union and the UN fail, Vatanka believes that Iran would follow a "North Korea model," since Ahmadinejad's base of support among the "Islamist militias" has been "urging withdrawal from the NPT [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty]." The Iranian government's "tactic" so far, Vatanka said, is governed by the belief that "by shouting the loudest, you'll get concessions [from the West]."


LISTEN

Listen to the complete panel discussion (about 60 minutes):
Real Audio Windows Media


THE COMPLETE STORY: RFE/RL's coverage of the controversy surrounding Iran's nuclear program.


CHRONOLOGY

An annotated timeline of Iran's nuclear program.