Accessibility links

Breaking News

Permanent Five At UN To Discuss Iran Again

John Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations (file photo) (epa) March 10, 2006 -- The five permanent members of the UN Security Council -- Britain, China, France, Russia, and the United States -- will today hold a second closed-door meeting to discuss a response to the Iranian nuclear crisis.

The U.S. ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, says the United States will press the council to adopt a "vigorous" statement to address Iran's "continued, aggressive pursuit of nuclear weapons."

Bolton also pointed to further dangers, saying "we're confronted with a threat here as Iran pursues not only nuclear weapons but the capability -- through increasingly longer range and more accurate ballistic missiles -- to develop those on targets in the region and in the broader world."

He said the Security Council has a responsibility to deal with that "very, very dangerous" threat.

Security Council members have indicated they will move slowly, focusing initially on a statement that will likely ask Iran to comply with demands by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN's nuclear watchdog.

(AP, Reuters)

What Would Sanctions Mean?

What Would Sanctions Mean?

Economic sanctions could further undermine Iran's already shaky economy (Fars)

MOVING TOWARD SANCTIONS: If the United Nations Security Council imposes sanctions on Iran, domestic support for Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad will wane, according to ALEX VATANKA, Eurasia editor for Jane's Information Group.
Vatanka told a February 24 RFE/RL briefing that "economic sanctions will hurt the average Iranian" and, consequently, many "will blame the ruling clerics" for making life difficult and "impairing the country's long term development."
Vatanka said sanctions would be a serious challenge to the Iranian government. If harsh economic sanctions were imposed, Iran's poorest population will be hurt the hardest -- and might react "as they did in the 1970s and protest in the streets." Sanctions on travel, Vatanka said, would hurt a many Iranians because "Iran is a nation of small traders" who depend on the ability to travel to earn an income. According to Vatanka, unemployment in Iran is estimated at 30 percent, "so small trading is essential to survival." Although current U.S. sanctions "haven't worked," he said, "Iranians fear an oil embargo." He stressed that "oil revenues are a major part of the economy, so it is critical to look at this sector."
Should negotiations with the European Union and the UN fail, Vatanka believes that Iran would follow a "North Korea model," since Ahmadinejad's base of support among the "Islamist militias" has been "urging withdrawal from the NPT [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty]." The Iranian government's "tactic" so far, Vatanka said, is governed by the belief that "by shouting the loudest, you'll get concessions [from the West]."


Listen to the complete panel discussion (about 60 minutes):
Real Audio Windows Media

THE COMPLETE STORY: RFE/RL's coverage of the controversy surrounding Iran's nuclear program.


An annotated timeline of Iran's nuclear program.