Accessibility links

Breaking News

EU Stresses Diplomacy In Iran Nuclear Standoff

The U.S. ambassador to the IAEA, Gregory Schulte (file photo) (epa) PRAGUE, September 2, 2006 (RFE/RL) -- European Union foreign ministers say they want to continue diplomatic efforts to resolve the standoff over Iran's nuclear program rather than rush to impose UN sanctions on Tehran.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Iran failed to comply with an August 31 UN deadline to halt its uranium enrichment. The West fears Iran's nuclear program is aimed at producing atomic weapons, a charge that Iran denies.

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, speaking today at a meeting of the 25 EU ministers in Finland, said the EU had "no interest" in escalating the crisis, but said Iran had to show it was serious about continuing talks.

The EU's chief diplomat, Javier Solana, is to hold talks next week with senior Iranian nuclear officials. On September 1, the first day of the two-day meeting in Finland, Solana said that time for talks with Iran was not "infinite."

In an interview with RFE/RL's Radio Farda, Gregory Schulte, the U.S. ambassador to the IAEA, said Washington also wants a diplomatic solution, and stressed that "we strongly support the peaceful use of nuclear technology, including by Iran."

However, he noted that "after three years of intensive verification work" the head of the IAEA, Muhammad el-Baradei, "cannot certify that Iran's nuclear program is peaceful."

He added that Iran's uranium enrichment activities "are not necessary for civil nuclear power."

Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad has repeatedly said that his country has no intention of giving up its right to peaceful nuclear technology.

Afraid Of Sanctions?

Afraid Of Sanctions?
Comprehensive sanctions could further slow development in Iran's strategic oil and gas sectors (Fars)

WHAT DOES TEHRAN REALLY THINK? On August 22, Radio Farda correspondent Fatemeh Aman spoke with Alex Vatanka, Eurasia editor for Jane's Information Group, by telephone from Alexandria, Virginia. Vatanka discussed the possible impact that comprehensive sanctions could have for Iran.

Radio Farda: Some Iranian authorities are trying to create the impression that they aren't concerned about the possibility of international sanctions against it. They emphasize that what Iran has achieved so far has happened despite the sanctions already in place against it. Are they really not afraid of sanctions?

Vatanka: I think that what the Iranians are trying to do is to continue to play this balancing act. On the one hand, they are trying to say, "Look, we have done without you for 27 years; we can continue." On the other hand, if you look at every other major Iranian overture toward the U.S., obviously what they are hoping to do is remove those sanctions. It is the sanctions that have been the biggest obstacle to a genuine expansion in the Iranian economy. It is the sanctions and U.S. policies vis-a-vis Iran that have, for instance, kept Iran from joining the World Bank. It is sanctions and so on that have made the Iranian oil industry have such a tough time in bringing investment into the strategic oil and gas sectors. People like [former Iranian President Ali Akbar Hashemi-]Rafsanjani back in the mid 1990s even kept certain fields untouched because the idea was that U.S. companies should have those once the sanctions were lifted.
I think sanctions are quite important to the Iranians, but at the same time what they are trying to say is, "Don't assume that we are going to fall off our chair just because you mentioned the sanctions card." It is part of a kind diplomatic chess game going on by Tehran. But remember if we look and listen to Iranian reformists, this is being openly debated inside Iran. The question that is being asked of [President Mahmud Ahmadinejad and his entourage] is, "What is the ultimate objective?" Is it just Islamic independence? Is it just the ability to enrich uranium? The debate in Iran by the reformists -- and I think a lot of people would sympathize with this -- is, "What are we being sanctioned for exactly and what policies do you have to make sure that those sanctions don't hit us harder than we have already been hit?"
Remember, the big issue here is this: Iran has been sanctioned by the U.S. Iran has never faced comprehensive United Nations sanctions. The Iranian people have never suffered on a scale that the Iraqi people, for instance, suffered because of such sanctions. So it is kind of disingenuous of these senior leaders to pretend that Iran has already gone through comprehensive sanctions. Iran has not. And it will be totally different set of circumstances that will have a totally different impact on Iranian society and the economy, should the UN impose comprehensive sanctions on the country.

THE COMPLETE PICTURE: RFE/RL's complete coverage of controversy surrounding Iran's nuclear program.


An annotated timeline of Iran's nuclear program.