Accessibility links

Breaking News

Security Council Schedules Iran Sanctions Vote

British UN Ambassador Jones (left) with French UN Ambassador Jean Marc de La Sabliere earlier this month (epa) March 23, 2007 -- Diplomats say the United Nations Security Council intends to vote on March 24 on a draft resolution that would tighten sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program.

The announcement was made after the major powers on the Security Council considered amendments to the draft that were proposed by Indonesia, Qatar, and South Africa -- all non-permanent members of the Security Council.

Diplomats say some minor changes were accepted, but the five veto-holding members of the Security Council -- the United States, Russia, France, Britain, and China -- rejected South Africa's proposal for a 90-day suspension of sanctions on Iran.

"The text that we have submitted is one which we believe finds the center of gravity of the debate," British UN Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry told journalists. "It's an appropriate, proportional, incremental response to the situation, and it is one where we have sought to take account of the views of the council."

The draft resolution again demands that Iran halt uranium-enrichment activities. The proposed new sanctions would ban Iranian arms exports and impose an international freeze on the assets of 28 individuals and organizations involved in Iran's nuclear and missile programs.

Meanwhile, Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad has pledged that Iran will make "new proposals" aimed at resolving the international dispute over the nuclear program.

In an interview with French television on March 22, Ahmadinejad, however, again rejected United Nations Security Council demands for Iran to halt uranium enrichment.

He said was not worried about the possibility of U.S. military strikes against Iran, saying the circumstances do not favor such an attack being carried out.

(compiled from agency reports)

Afraid Of Sanctions?

Afraid Of Sanctions?
Comprehensive sanctions could further slow development in Iran's strategic oil and gas sectors (Fars)

WHAT DOES TEHRAN REALLY THINK? On August 22, Radio Farda correspondent Fatemeh Aman spoke with Alex Vatanka, Eurasia editor for Jane's Information Group, by telephone from Alexandria, Virginia. Vatanka discussed the possible impact that comprehensive sanctions could have for Iran.

Radio Farda: Some Iranian authorities are trying to create the impression that they aren't concerned about the possibility of international sanctions against it. They emphasize that what Iran has achieved so far has happened despite the sanctions already in place against it. Are they really not afraid of sanctions?

Vatanka: I think that what the Iranians are trying to do is to continue to play this balancing act. On the one hand, they are trying to say, "Look, we have done without you for 27 years; we can continue." On the other hand, if you look at every other major Iranian overture toward the U.S., obviously what they are hoping to do is remove those sanctions. It is the sanctions that have been the biggest obstacle to a genuine expansion in the Iranian economy. It is the sanctions and U.S. policies vis-a-vis Iran that have, for instance, kept Iran from joining the World Bank. It is sanctions and so on that have made the Iranian oil industry have such a tough time in bringing investment into the strategic oil and gas sectors. People like [former Iranian President Ali Akbar Hashemi-]Rafsanjani back in the mid 1990s even kept certain fields untouched because the idea was that U.S. companies should have those once the sanctions were lifted.
I think sanctions are quite important to the Iranians, but at the same time what they are trying to say is, "Don't assume that we are going to fall off our chair just because you mentioned the sanctions card." It is part of a kind diplomatic chess game going on by Tehran. But remember if we look and listen to Iranian reformists, this is being openly debated inside Iran. The question that is being asked of [President Mahmud Ahmadinejad and his entourage] is, "What is the ultimate objective?" Is it just Islamic independence? Is it just the ability to enrich uranium? The debate in Iran by the reformists -- and I think a lot of people would sympathize with this -- is, "What are we being sanctioned for exactly and what policies do you have to make sure that those sanctions don't hit us harder than we have already been hit?"
Remember, the big issue here is this: Iran has been sanctioned by the U.S. Iran has never faced comprehensive United Nations sanctions. The Iranian people have never suffered on a scale that the Iraqi people, for instance, suffered because of such sanctions. So it is kind of disingenuous of these senior leaders to pretend that Iran has already gone through comprehensive sanctions. Iran has not. And it will be totally different set of circumstances that will have a totally different impact on Iranian society and the economy, should the UN impose comprehensive sanctions on the country.

THE COMPLETE PICTURE: RFE/RL's complete coverage of controversy surrounding Iran's nuclear program.


An annotated timeline of Iran's nuclear program.