We are now closing the live blog for today. Don't forget you can keep up with all our ingoing Ukraine coverage here.
Leonid Bershidsky has written an excellent piece for Bloomberg on Angela Merkel's approach to dealing with Vladimir Putin. Here's a taster:
I wrote a post yesterday that said the contemptuous treatment of President Vladimir Putin at the Group of 20 meeting was juvenile and counterproductive. I knew I would get a reaction. I have received dozens of e-mails stating that Putin got what he deserved and decrying what the writers saw as my support for appeasement. There also have been messages from people who agreed with me for the wrong reasons: These correspondents see Putin as leading a righteous fight against U.S. imperialism.
As a Russian who, thanks to Putin's policies, can't imagine a future in Russia, I take these e-mails to heart. I would like Putin's regime to fall and be replaced with a liberal, pro-European government that would put Russia on a convergence path with the European Union. I don't condone Putin's actions in Ukraine, starting with the annexation of Crimea and continuing with his support for separatist goons in Donetsk and Luhansk.
Still, baiting Putin isn't the right thing to do.
And that's what German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who had the longest meeting with the Russian president at the G-20, thinks, too.
Yesterday, Merkel gave a lecture in Sydney, laying out a detailed vision of the Western strategy for dealing with Putin. Merkel has a unique perspective: She spent more than half her life in communist East Germany, a country controlled by Putin's colleagues from the KGB and the Soviet ruling elite. She sees Putin's attack on Ukraine as a return to Soviet-style strongman tactics.
Her proposed strategy stems from her experience:
We know that even small conflicts may have big complications very quickly, so we drew the conclusion from the past that this conflict cannot be resolved by military means because that would lead us into a military conflict with Russia, which would almost certainly not be of a limited geographical nature. On the other hand, that we cannot solve it militarily doesn't mean we can't solve it at all. So what sorts of instruments do we have at our disposal? Well, we have economic strength. We are called on to accept some disadvantages, but I do think economic power is one of our fortes as Western nations and I think we should use this, though not as an end in itself. The question is, how long do we wait for this to take effect? It's my personal experience from the history of the German Democratic Republic is that one should not lose hope too quickly. For 40 years we heard radio broadcasts about the imminent collapse of the GDR, and after 40 years, when everyone had lost hope, it happened.
In other words, Merkel hopes Western economic pressure will eventually force the Putin regime to back down and could even destroy it, as was the case for the Soviet Union. That's why the chancellor is a firm believer in sanctions, and that's why Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov are wrong to believe the economic restrictions against Russia won't last.
Taking the long view allows Western leaders to feel free to insult Putin: It's politically popular and in 40 years other presidents and prime ministers will reap the fruit of victory, anyway. But that's not Merkel's way. She is willing to talk with Putin for hours. Her attitude shows she has absorbed the lessons of German history. In her lecture, she said World War I erupted because of a "lack of communication among the elites of almost all European states."
Read the rest of the article here
Here's another brief item from RFE/RL's news desk on the German foreign minister's visit to Kyiv and Moscow:
German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier flew from Kyiv to Moscow and met with his Russian counterpart during the evening of November 18.
Steinmeier and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov discussed the deteriorating situation in Ukraine.
Both reportedly agreed on the need to return to the so-called Minsk protocol, a dialogue that involves the warring factions in Ukraine, as well as Russia and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
Steinmeier said he did not "see reasons for optimism" that the Minsk protocol could achieve a breakthrough on the ground in eastern Ukraine where more than 4,000 people have been killed in fighting since March.
But he said "it would be a huge loss" to abandon the protocol at this time.
Steinmeier and Lavrov also called on Kyiv and the separatist leadership in Donetsk and Luhansk regions to start direct talks aiming at pulling their military forces back.
(Interfax, TASS, Reuters)